과제정보
This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number : HI20C2092).
참고문헌
- Voros S, Rinehart S, Qian Z, Vazquez G, Anderson H, Murrieta L, et al. Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:198-208 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.008
- Sun J, Zhang Z, Lu B, Yu W, Yang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:748-754 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2763
- Boogers MJ, Broersen A, van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, El-Naggar HM, Kitslaar PH, et al. Automated quantification of coronary plaque with computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound using a dedicated registration algorithm for fusion-based quantification. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1007-1016 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr465
- Dey D, Schepis T, Marwan M, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Achenbach S. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US. Radiology 2010;257:516-522 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100681
- Park EA, Lee W, Park SJ, Kim YK, Hwang HY. Influence of coronary artery diameter on intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient during CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:1074-1083 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.028
- Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, Desai MY, Mamuya W, Thomson L, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:190-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2009.03.004
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-160 https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204
- Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
- Feuchtner G, Loureiro R, Bezerra H, Rocha-Filho JA, Sarwar A, Pflederer T, et al. Quantification of coronary stenosis by dual source computed tomography in patients: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound and invasive angiography. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:83-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.008
- Sun Z, Xu L. Coronary CT angiography in the quantitative assessment of coronary plaques. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:346380
- Akutagawa O, Kijima Y, Kume K, Sakai T, Okura A, Ide K, et al. Feasibility and limitation of coronary plaque volumetry by contrast-enhanced 64-row multi-detector computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2011;150:118-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.04.033