한국지리정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies)

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.40-51
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-9719(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6952(eISSN)
한국지리정보학회 (The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도시균형발전을 위한 도시공간구조 변화 진단

Analysis of Changes in Urban Spatial Structure for Balanced Urban Development

  • 김호용 (동아대학교 도시계획공학과)
  • KIM, Ho-Yong (Dept. of Urban Planning and Engineering, Dong-A University)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.31
  • 심사 : 2021.06.09
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 지속 가능한 도시성장 관리를 위한 일환으로 도시균형발전을 위해 공간모델링 기법을 이용하여 도시공간 구조 진단하는 것이다. 도시공간구조는 다양한 활동의 상호작용이므로 공간구조 요소들의 패턴 변화 분석과 함께 요소들의 분석 결과를 연계하여 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 인구, 교통 분야에 대하여 접근하였으며, 대상지의 관련 법령에 따라 정의된 다양한 생활권별 공간구조를 분석하였다. 인구는 시계열별 변화 데이터를 공간통계기법인 Getis-Ord Gi* 기법에 적용함으로써 인구 집중지역에 대한 군집 변화를 분석하였으며, 교통은 출퇴근 교통 O-D 데이터를 Social Network Analysis 기법에 적용함으로써 중심성 변화를 분석하였다. 분석결과 대상지 전체적으로 불균형이 심화되고 있었으며, 중심성의 변화가 분석되었다. 분석 결과는 다른 공간요인과 연계하여 해석함으로써 생활권별 도시공간구조를 전망하고 지속 가능한 도시성장관리를 위한 방향을 제시할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과는 해당 도시에서 진행되고 있는 도시정책뿐만 아니라, 전 세계 많은 도시에서도 급속한 도시발전과 통제할 수 없는 개발에 대응하기 위하여 도입하고 있는 다양한 도시 성장 관리 정책의 의사결정을 위한 도구로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to diagnose urban spatial structures using spatial modeling techniques for balanced urban development as part of sustainable urban growth management. Since urban spatial structure is an interaction of various activities, it is necessary to interpret the analysis results in conjunction with the analysis of changes in spatial structural elements. In this study, population and transportation were approached for research purposes. Population data were applied to the Getis-Ord Gi* method, a spatial statistical technique, to analyze the concentration-decreasing region of the population. Traffic data analyzed the trend of centrality change by applying commuting traffic O-D data to Social Network Analysis techniques. The analysis showed that urban imbalance was growing, and the centrality of transportation was changing. The results of the analysis of spatial structure elements could be interpreted by linking the results of each factor to each neighborhood unit, predicting changes in urban spatial structure and suggesting directions for sustainable urban growth management.These results could also be used as a decision-making tool for various urban growth management policies introduced to cope with rapid urban development and uncontrollable development in many cities around the world.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 동아대학교 교내연구비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음

참고문헌

  1. Aburas, M.M., Ho, Y.M., Ramli, M.F. and Z.H. Ashaari. 2017. Improving the capability of an integrated CA-Markov model to simulate spatio-temporal urban growth trends using an analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 59:65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.03.006
  2. Berberoglu, S., Akin, A. and K.C. Clarke. 2016. Cellular automata modeling approaches to forecast urban growth for Adana, Turkey: A comparative approach. Landscape and Urban Plan 153:11-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.017
  3. Chae, M.O. 1997. Spatial distribution of land prices and its determinants in Seoul. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Seoul, Seoul, Korea
  4. Cho, M.H. and C.H. Yim. 2001. A Analysis on spatial structure in Seoul metropolitan area. Journal of the Korean Planners Association 36(7):183-195
  5. Clarke, K.C., Hoppen, S. and L. Gaydos. 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning B 24(2):247-261. https://doi.org/10.1068/b240247
  6. Davies, W.K.D. 1967. Centrality and the central place hierarchy. Urban studies 4: 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420986720080041
  7. Freeman, A.M. 1979. The benefits of environmental improvement. Washington: Resource for the Future.
  8. Getis, A. and A. Ord. 1992. The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics, Geographical Analysis, 24(3):189-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
  9. Guan, C.H. and P.G. Rowe. 2016. Should big cities grow? Scenario-based cellular automata urban growth modeling and policy applications. Journal of Urban Management 5(2):65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2017.01.002
  10. Guan, G., Wang, L. and K.C. Clark. 2005. An artificial-neural-network-based, constrained CA model for simulating urban growth. Cartography and Geographic 32(4):369-380. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304005775194746
  11. Ha, C.H. 2005. A study on urban structure with autocorrelation analysis in Masan and Changwon. Ph.D. Thesis, Gyeongsang National Univ., Jinju, Korea.
  12. Ha, S.K., Kim, J.I., and M.J. Jeon. 1995. The patterns of urban spatial structural changes -The case of Seoul metropolitan areas. Journal of Korea Planning Association 30(5):141-152
  13. Jeon, M.J. 1995. Is Seoul really polycentric?. Journal of the Korean Planners Association 30(4):285-294
  14. Jeong, Y.Y. and T.H. Moon. 2014. Analysis of Seoul urban spatial structure using pedestrian flow data-comparative study with'2030 Seoul Plan'. Journal of The Korea Regional Development Association 26(3):139-158
  15. Kim, H.C. and K.H. Ahn. 2012. The relation of population, jobs, social capitals and centrality in Seoul Metropolitan Area, using Social Network Theory. The Korea Spatial Planning Review 59:105-122
  16. Kim, H.K., Y.E. Shin, T.K. Baek, G.C. Kang, H.S. Jeng, J.H. Oh and S.J. Yeo. 2007. The study on the downtown spatial functional analysis and downtown classification using GIS. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 10(4):75-86
  17. Kim, H.Y. 2012. Analysis of change in the population distribution based on spatial relationship using the sphere of influence. The Korea Spatial Planning Review 73:47-61 https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2012.73..003
  18. Kim, H.Y. and E.S. Bae. 2020. An analysis of the spatial structure changes according to the reorganization of metropolitan city using population potential : focused on Busan metropolitan city. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 23(2):83-94 https://doi.org/10.11108/KAGIS.2020.23.2.083
  19. Kim, H.Y., Kim, J.S. and S.H. Lee. 2012. A Spatial statistical approach to the delimitation of CBD. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 15(4):42-54 https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2012.15.4.042
  20. Kim, S.S., An, S.H., Shin, Y.C. and H.T. Kim. 2008. Analysis of central place hierarchy change in Daejeon metropolitan city. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 11(3):23-33
  21. Kim, Y., Ha, C.H. and J.G. Ahn. 2004. A Comparative study on urban structure with autocorrelation and interaction analysis in Masan and Changwon. Journal of the Korean Planners Association 39(6):7-22
  22. Kim, Y.H. 2011. Social Network Analysis. Parkyoungsa, Seoul, pp.39-44
  23. Korea Land and Housing Corporation. 2018. Analysis of characteristics of linked type local cities for mutual prosperity. Land and Housing Institute, Daejeon, Korea, pp.103-105
  24. Lee, J.S. 2008. The establishment of spatial structure and its change in the capital region by using interaction analysis : 1995-2005. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society 11(3):91-100
  25. Nam, K.W., Kang I.J. and D.H. Im. 2009. Variability in the effective spatial range of the population centripetal force of CBD. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 12(2):120-131
  26. Seo, K.M., Kim, H.Y., Lee, S.H. and T.H. Kwon. 2014. Analysis on characteristics of spatial structure related with urban planning : Using Spatial Statistical Method. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 17(2):1-14 https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2014.17.2.001
  27. Statistic Korea : national indicator system. www.index.go.kr. (Accessed march 12, 2020).
  28. Wheeler, S.M., Tomuta, M., Haden, V.R. and L.E. Jackson. 2013. The impacts of alternative patterns of urbanization on greenhouse gas emissions in an agricultural county. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 6:213-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2013.777356