대한정형외과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association)

  • 제56권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-13
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-2102(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8918(eISSN)
대한정형외과학회 (Korean Orthopaedic Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전방십자인대 재건수술은 지난 20년간 어떻게 발전하였나?

What Has Been Learned in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction during the Past 20 Years?

  • 노두현 (서울대학교 의과대학 서울대학교병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 한혁수 (서울대학교 의과대학 서울대학교병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이명철 (서울대학교 의과대학 서울대학교병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Ro, Du Hyun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Hyuk-Soo (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Myung Chul (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.09.01
  • 심사 : 2020.10.12
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

전방십자인대 재건수술 술기는 최근 20년간 많은 발전을 이뤘으며 결과가 과거에 비해 크게 향상되었다. 전방십자인대의 해부학적 이해 또한 20년 전과 현재가 다르며 이에 맞추어 수술 방법 또한 변화하고 있다. 이중다발 개념은 여전히 유효하나 리본 형태의 전방십자인대 모양, 직접 섬유, 간접 섬유가 그 개념을 서서히 대체하고 있다. 등장점 개념은 더 이상 존재하지 않으며 단일다발 해부학적 재건, 이중다발 해부학적 재건, 잔류조직 보존술식, 직각터널 술식 등 다양한 수술 방법들이 행해지고 있으며 논문을 통해 검증되고 있다. 이식건의 종류에 있어서도 자가건인 골-슬개건-골, 슬건, 대퇴사두근건, 동종건에 대한 관심이 시간에 따라 변화하고 있으며 이런 변화는 현재 진행형이다.

Considerable progress on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery has been made over the past 20 years, and the results have improved significantly. An anatomical understanding of the anterior cruciate ligament has also changed, and the surgical technique has also changed accordingly. The double-bundle concept is still valid, but the ribbon-shaped anterior cruciate ligament concept, including direct fiber and indirect fiber, is gradually replacing it. The isometry point theory no longer exists, and various surgical methods, such as single-bundle anatomical reconstruction, double-bundle reconstruction, remnant preservation, and rectangular tunnel technique, are being performed. Regarding the graft, interest in the bone-patellar tendon-bone, patellar tendon, quadriceps tendon, and allogeneic tendon change over time, and this change is ongoing.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M, et al. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2363-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514542796
  2. Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1502-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516629944
  3. Myklebust G, Bahr R. Return to play guidelines after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:127-31. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.010900
  4. Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP. Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:267-88. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2006.2011
  5. Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Akeson WH. The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament autograft of patellar tendon origin. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:449-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658601400603
  6. Arama Y, Salmon LJ, Sri-Ram K, Linklater J, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA. Bioabsorbable versus titanium screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a prospective, blinded, randomized controlled trial with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:1893-901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515588926
  7. Andersson C, Odensten M, Gillquist J. Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized study with a longterm follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;264:255-63.
  8. Kyung BS, Kim JG, Chang M, et al. Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction techniques result in graft obliquities that closely mimic the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1302-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513484692
  9. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:213-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0709-5
  10. Smigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwiega M, Ciszek B, Williams A. The anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relevance to the technique of reconstruction. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:1020-6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37117
  11. Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernandez F, et al. Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial "C"-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:3136-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3058-6
  12. Smigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwiega M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Lyson B, Siebold R. Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:3143-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3146-7
  13. Watson JN, Wilson KJ, LaPrade CM, et al. Iatrogenic injury of the anterior meniscal root attachments following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel reaming. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:2360-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3079-1
  14. Fink C, Smigielski R, Siebold R, Abermann E, Herbort M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a ribbon-like graft with a C-shaped tibial bone tunnel. Arthrosc Tech. 2020;9:e247-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2019.10.005
  15. Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, et al. Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:771-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.04.016
  16. Howell SM, Clark JA. Tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and graft impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;283:187-95.
  17. Yaru NC, Daniel DM, Penner D. The effect of tibial attachment site on graft impingement in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:217-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659202000222
  18. Romano VM, Graf BK, Keene JS, Lange RH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of tibial tunnel placement on range of motion. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:415-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659302100315
  19. Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB. The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:335-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659602400315
  20. Canale ST, Campbell WC. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2003.
  21. Sapega AA, Moyer RA, Schneck C, Komalahiranya N. Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:259-67. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199072020-00015
  22. O'Meara PM, O'Brien WR, Henning CE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction stability with continuous passive motion. The role of isometric graft placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;277:201-9.
  23. Kim YK, Yoo JD, Kim SW, Park SH, Cho JH, Lim HM. Intraoperative graft isometry in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30:115-20. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.16.077
  24. da Silva RR, Matos MA, Costa VCNB, de Morais VHAA, Lago de Castro LE. Tomographic study of femoral positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transtibial technique. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:195-202. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.16.005
  25. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, et al. Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1427-31. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00655
  26. Piasecki DP, Bach BR Jr. Anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a transtibial technique. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39:302-4.
  27. Kim YM, Joo YB, Lee KY, Hwang SJ. Femoral footprint for anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30:128-32. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.17.057
  28. Kim YC, Tawonsawatruk T, Woon HH, et al. The effect of different sagittal angles of the tibial guide on aperture widening of the tibial tunnel during modified transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized in vivo study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:26-32. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.16.033
  29. Lee JK, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Modified transtibial technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2014;4:e15. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.N.00078
  30. Ko D, Kim HJ, Oh SH, Kim BJ, Kim SJ. How to avoid graft-tunnel length mismatch in modified transtibial technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10:407-12. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.4.407
  31. Lee JK, Yang JH. Tunnel position for anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2020;55:305-10. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2020.55.4.305
  32. Shen W, Jordan S, Fu F. Review article: anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2007;15:216-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500219
  33. Mehta A, Lin CC, Campbell RA, et al. Effects of anteromedial portal versus transtibial ACL tunnel preparation on contact characteristics of the graft and the tibial tunnel aperture. Clin Orthop Surg. 2019;11:52-9. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.52
  34. Jeon YS, Choi SW, Park JH, Yoon JS, Shin JS, Kim MK. Midterm outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:19-25. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.15.061
  35. Kim KI, Lee SH, Bae C, Bae SH. Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of the tunnel location and angle in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:11-8. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.16.054
  36. Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH. Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:512-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511426416
  37. Ahn JH, Ko TS, Lee YS, Jeong HJ, Park JK. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical results of outside-in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of fixed- and adjustable-length loop cortical fixation. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10:157-66. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.157
  38. Sundararajan SR, Sambandam B, Singh A, Rajagopalakrishnan R, Rajasekaran S. Does second-generation suspensory implant negate tunnel widening of first-generation implant following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30:341-7. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.18.005
  39. Noh JH, Lee JW. One-year serial follow-up magnetic resonance imaging study of RigidFix for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:203-9. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.16.073
  40. Kang SG, Lee YS. Arthroscopic control for safe and secure seating of suspensory devices for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three different techniques. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:33-8. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.16.053
  41. Pujol N, Fong O, Karoubi M, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P. Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:43-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0861-6
  42. Kim YM, Lee CA, Matava MJ. Clinical results of arthroscopic single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:425-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510374452
  43. Tiamklang T, Sumanont S, Foocharoen T, Laopaiboon M. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD008413.
  44. Hawi N, Haasper C. "Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes" Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2014) 22:1986-1996 DOI 10.1007/s00167-013-2676-8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1268-9.
  45. Ahn GY, Nam IH, Lee YH, et al. Factors affecting the extent of graft tendon synovialization after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: based on second-look arthroscopic findings. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10:413-9. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.4.413
  46. Svantesson E, Sundemo D, Hamrin Senorski E, et al. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to single-bundle reconstruction in terms of revision frequency: a study of 22,460 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:3884-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4387-4
  47. Colvin AC, Shen W, Musahl V, Fu FH. Avoiding pitfalls in anatomic ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:956-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0804-2
  48. Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Kanaya A. Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:463.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.034
  49. Wang HD, Wang FS, Gao SJ, Zhang YZ. Remnant preservation technique versus standard technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0937-4
  50. Kodama Y, Furumatsu T, Hino T, Kamatsuki Y, Ozaki T. Minimal ablation of the tibial stump using bony landmarks improved stability and synovial coverage following double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30:348-55. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.18.024
  51. Fink C, Lawton R, Forschner F, Gfoller P, Herbort M, Hoser C. Minimally invasive quadriceps tendon single-bundle, arthroscopic, anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectangular bone tunnels. Arthrosc Tech. 2018;7:e1045-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2018.06.012
  52. Lee DW, Shim JC, Yang SJ, Cho SI, Kim JG. Functional effects of single semitendinosus tendon harvesting in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of single versus dual hamstring harvesting. Clin Orthop Surg. 2019;11:60-72. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.1.60
  53. Kato Y, Chavez J, Yamada S, Hattori S, Takazawa S, Ohuchi H. Beta-tricalcium phosphate block for donor site morbidity of the patella in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2019;31:113-9.
  54. Lee S, Seong SC, Jo CH, Han HS, An JH, Lee MC. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of autologous quadriceps tendon graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89 Suppl 3:116-26.
  55. Lee JK, Lee S, Lee MC. Outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-quadriceps tendon graft versus double-bundle hamstring tendon graft. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2323-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516650666
  56. Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:3531-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518825340
  57. Bansal A, Lamplot JD, VandenBerg J, Brophy RH. Meta-analysis of the risk of infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by graft type. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:1500-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517714450
  58. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE Jr. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1986-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504271211
  59. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, et al. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2470-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509333006
  60. Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2459-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9
  61. Camillieri G, Di Sanzo V, Ferretti M, Calderaro C, Calvisi V. Patellar tendon ossification after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:164. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-164
  62. Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, et al. Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:598-602. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32868
  63. Hurley ET, Calvo-Gurry M, Withers D, Farrington SK, Moran R, Moran CJ. Quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:1690-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.046
  64. Mouarbes D, Dagneaux L, Olivier M, et al. Lower donor-site morbidity using QT autografts for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:2558-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05873-1
  65. Foster TE, Wolfe BL, Ryan S, Silvestri L, Kaye EK. Does the graft source really matter in the outcome of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction results: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:189-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509356530
  66. Singhal MC, Gardiner JR, Johnson DL. Failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament surgery using anterior tibialis allograft. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:469-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.010
  67. Kraeutler MJ, Bravman JT, McCarty EC. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2439-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513484127