Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association (대한정형외과학회지)

Korean Orthopaedic Association (대한정형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mid-Term Results of Modified Hoffman Procedure for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformity

류마티스 전족부 변형에 대한 변형 Hoffman 술식의 중기 결과

  • Kim, Yoon-Chung (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Choi, Hyun Chul (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hyo Jin (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Jae Hoon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital)
  • 김윤정 (성빈센트병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 최현철 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이효진 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 안재훈 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2021.03.16
  • Accepted : 2021.08.08
  • Published : 2021.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: A rheumatoid forefoot deformity includes severe hallux valgus and claw toe of the four lateral toes. The authors intended to analyze the mid-term results of the modified Hoffman procedure for a rheumatoid forefoot deformity. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two feet of eighteen patients were followed up for more than two years after the modified Hoffman procedure. The mean age was 54.7 years, and the mean follow-up period was three years and four months. Clinically visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) MP-IP score were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively. The postoperative complications, the satisfaction of patients, and the presence of plantar callosity were also analyzed. Radiographically, the hallux valgus angle, the 1st intermetatarsal angle, the 1st interphalangeal angle, the 1st interphalangeal joint arthritic change after the operation, and the dorsiflexion angle and the time to union of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint were analyzed. Results: Clinically, the VAS and AOFAS score were respectively improved from 7.1 points and 30.3 points preoperatively to 1.5 points and 83.1 points postoperatively (p<0.001). All patients were satisfied with the results. Plantar callosity disappeared in all cases. Radiographically, the mean hallux valgus angle, the 1st intermetatarsal angle, and the 1st interphalangeal angle changed from 52.8°, 13.3°, and 7.5° preoperatively to 16.2°, 8.7°, and 14.6° postoperatively (p<0.001). The mean dorsiflexion angle of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint was 17.2° postoperatively. The mean time to radiographic union of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint was 11.1 weeks. There were two cock-up deformities of the lesser toe, one wound problem, and two hallux interphalangeal joint arthritis as a complication. There were no cases of nonunion of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint. Conclusion: The modified Hoffman procedure appears to be a safe and satisfactory procedure for a rheumatoid forefoot deformity.

목적: 류마티스 전족부 변형은 심한 무지 외반증과 소족지의 갈퀴 족지 변형으로 이루어진다. 저자들은 류마티스 전족부 변형에 대한 변형 Hoffman 술식의 중기 결과를 분석하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 18명, 22예의 환자가 변형 Hoffman 술식 후 최소 2년 이상 추시되었다. 평균 연령은 54.7세였고 평균 추시 기간은 3년 4개월이었다. 임상적으로 시각통증척도와 미국 정형외과 족부족관절학회 점수를 술 전 및 술 후에 비교하였다. 또한 술 후 합병증과 환자의 만족도 및 족저부 굳은살의 소실 여부를 조사하였다. 방사선학적으로 무지 외반각, 제1-2 중족골간각, 제1 족지 지간각, 제1 족지 지간 관절의 관절염 발생 여부, 제1 중족지 관절 족배 굴곡각, 제1 중족지 관절의 유합 기간 등을 측정하였다. 결과: 임상적으로 시각통증척도와 미국 정형외과 족부족관절학회 점수는 술 전 평균 7.1점과 평균 30.3점에서 최종 추시 시 평균 1.5점과 평균 83.1점으로 호전되었다(p<0.001). 술 후 만족도는 전 환자가 만족하였으며, 술 후 족저부 굳은살은 모든 예에서 소실되었다. 방사선학적으로 무지 외반각, 제1-2 중족골간각, 제1 족지 지간각은 술 전 각각 평균 52.8도, 13.3도, 7.5도에서 최종 추시시 16.2도, 8.7도, 14.6도로 변화하였다(p<0.001). 제1 중족지 관절의 족배 굴곡각은 평균 17.2도였으며, 제1 중족지 관절은 평균 11.1주에 유합되었다. 합병증으로 소족지의 거상지 변형이 2예, 창상 문제가 1예, 제1 족지 지간 관절의 관절염이 2예에서 발생하였다. 제1 중족지 관절의 불유합은 관찰되지 않았다. 결론: 류마티스 전족부 변형에 대해 변형 Hoffman 술식은 안전하고 만족스러운 술식으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Vainio K. The rheumatoid foot; a clinical study with pathological and roentgenological comments. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn Suppl. 1956;45:1-107.
  2. Barton NJ. Arthroplasty of the forefoot in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973;55:126-33. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.55B1.126
  3. Choi KJ, Lee KT, Kim HC. Arthrodesis of the first metsatarophalangeal joint for rheumatoid arthritis and hallux valgus. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2000;35:345-50. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2000.35.2.345
  4. Coughlin MJ. Rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction. A longterm follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:322-41. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200003000-00004
  5. Clayton ML, Leidholt JD, Clark W. Arthroplasty of rheumatoid metatarsophalangeal joints. An outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;340:48-57. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199707000-00008
  6. Granberry WM, Noble PC, Bishop JO, Tullos HS. Use of a hinged silicone prosthesis for replacement arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:1453-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173100-00002
  7. Thordarson DB, Aval S, Krieger L. Failure of hallux MP preservation surgery for rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:486-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070202300603
  8. Amin A, Cullen N, Singh D. Rheumatoid forefoot reconstruction. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:289-97.
  9. van der Heijden KW, Rasker JJ, Jacobs JW, Dey K. Kates forefoot arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A 5-year followup study. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:1545-50.
  10. Hoffmann P. An operation for severe grades of contracted or clawed toes. Am J Orthop Surg. 1912;s2-9:441-9.
  11. Rahman H, Fagg PS. Silicone granulomatous reactions after first metatarsophalangeal hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:637-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B4.8331122
  12. Thomas S, Kinninmonth AW, Kumar CS. Long-term results of the modified Hoffman procedure in the rheumatoid forefoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:748-52. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200504000-00008
  13. Lee KT, Kim DH, Choi KJ. Reconstruction of rheumatoid forefoot deformities. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1998;33:302-8. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.1998.33.2.302
  14. Triolo P, Rosso F, Rossi R, Cerlon R, Cottino U, Bonasia DE. Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint and second to fifth metatarsal head resection for rheumatoid forefoot deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:263-70. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.11.008
  15. Mann RA, Schakel ME 2nd. Surgical correction of rheumatoid forefoot deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079501600101
  16. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500701
  17. Machacek F Jr, Easley ME, Gruber F, Ritschl P, Trnka HJ. Salvage of the failed Keller resection arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):86-94.
  18. Coughlin MJ, Abdo RV. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint with Vitallium plate fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:18-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500105
  19. Lipscomb PR, Benson GM, Sones DA. Resection of proximal phalanges and metatarsal condyles for deformities of the forefoot due to rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;82:24-31.
  20. Rosenbaum D, Timte B, Schmiegel A, Miehlke RK, Hilker A. First ray resection arthroplasty versus arthrodesis in the treatment of the rheumatoid foot. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:589-94. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.0589
  21. Lee KT, Choi JH, Young KW, Kim JS, Lee YK, Jung CM. Mid to long term follow-up results of reconstruction in rheumatoid arthritic forefoot deformities. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2007;11:171-6.
  22. Jaakkola JI, Mann RA. A review of rheumatoid arthritis affecting the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:866-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070402501205
  23. Siddle HJ, Redmond AC, Waxman R, et al. Debridement of painful forefoot plantar callosities in rheumatoid arthritis: the CARROT randomised controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:567-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-2134-x
  24. Fitzgerald JA. A review of long-term results of arthrodesis of the first metatarso-phalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969;51:488-93. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.51B3.488
  25. Mann RA, Oates JC. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle. 1980;1:159-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078000100305
  26. Mann RA, Thompson FM. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for hallux valgus in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:687-92. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198466050-00006
  27. Whitt KJ, Rincker SA, Hyer CF. Sustainability of forefoot reconstruction for the rheumatoid foot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55:583-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.02.003
  28. Sung W, Kluesner AJ, Irrgang J, Burns P, Wukich DK. Radiographic outcomes following primary arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in hallux abductovalgus deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:446-51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2010.06.007
  29. Berg RP, Kelder W, Olsthoorn PGM, Poll RG. Scarf and Weil osteotomies for correction of rheumatoid forefoot deformities: a review of 20 cases. Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;13:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2006.10.001
  30. Niki H, Hirano T, Akiyama Y, Mitsui H, Fujiya H. Long-term outcome of joint-preserving surgery by combination metatarsal osteotomies for shortening for forefoot deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25:683-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/14397595.2015.1008672