대한정형외과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association)

  • 제56권5호
  • /
  • Pages.404-412
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-2102(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8918(eISSN)
대한정형외과학회 (Korean Orthopaedic Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

근위 경골 절골술과 미세 골절술을 함께 시행 받은 환자 군에서 연골 재생에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 분석

Analysis of Factors for Cartilage Regeneration in Patients Who Underwent High Tibial Osteotomy Combined with Microfracture

  • 이영민 (전남대학교병원 정형외과) ;
  • 송은규 (화순전남대학교병원 관절센터) ;
  • 오호석 (전남대학교병원 정형외과) ;
  • 김유석 (전남대학교병원 정형외과) ;
  • 선종근 (화순전남대학교병원 관절센터)
  • Lee, Young Min (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Song, Eun-Kyoo (Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital) ;
  • Oh, Ho-Seok (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Seok (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Seon, Jong-Keun (Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2020.12.10
  • 심사 : 2021.01.28
  • 발행 : 2021.10.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 슬관절 내측 구획 골관절염으로 근위 경골 절골술 및 미세 골절술을 함께 시행한 환자 군에서 이차적 관절경 검사를 시행하여 연골 재생 정도를 평가하고 연골 재생에 영향을 미치는 요인을 규명하고자 한다. 또한 연골 재생의 정도와 기능적 결과가 연관성이 있는지 분석하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 2007년부터 2015년까지 근위 경골 절골술 및 미세 골절술을 함께 시행하였고, 최소 2년이 지나 금속판 제거술 및 이차 관절경 검사까지 시행 받은 81예를 대상으로 하였다. 술 전 대퇴부 연골 손상의 정도는 ICRS (International Cartilage Research Society) 분류를 이용하였고, 모두 grade III, IV 였다. 이차적 관절경 검사 이후에는 연골 재생이 양호한 그룹(grade I, II)과 불량한 그룹(grade III, IV)으로 분류하였다. 다변량 로지스틱 회기 분석을 통하여 연골 재생에 영향을 미치는 독립적인 요인을 파악하였다. 또한 두 그룹간의 수술 전후에 Knee Society score (KSS)와 Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC)를 이용하여 기능적 결과를 비교하였다. 결과: 연령, 성별, 체질량 지수, 술 전후 방사선학적 요인, 술 전 관절의 상태는 연골 재생의 정도에 유의한 영향을 끼치지 않았으며, 큰 연골 병변 범위(≥2.0 cm2) (p=0.011)와 키스 병변(kissing lesion)의 존재(p=0.027)는 불량한 연골 재생과 연관성이 있었다. KSS와 WOMAC 점수상에서는 연골의 재생이 양호한 그룹과 불량한 그룹 간의 유의한 차이는 없었다. 결론: 큰 연골 병변과 키스 병변의 존재는 근위 경골 절골술 및 미세 골절술 후 불량한 연골 재생과 관계가 있었다. 하지만 재생된 연골의 상태는 기능적 결과와 연관성을 보이지 않았다.

Purpose: This study examined the degree of cartilage regeneration by performing second-look arthroscopy in a group of patients who underwent high tibial osteotomy and microfractures for unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the medial knee joint and to determine the factors affecting cartilage regeneration. In addition, this study analyzed whether there is a relationship between the degree of cartilage regeneration and functional results. Materials and Methods: From 2007 to 2015, this study evaluated 81 cases who underwent second-look arthroscopy at the time of plate removal after a microfracture and high tibial osteotomy with a minimum two-year follow-up. The degree of femoral cartilage injury before surgery was classified by ICRS (International Cartilage Research Society), and all were grade III and IV. After second-look arthroscopy, cartilage regeneration was classified into a well-regenerated group (grade I, II) and a poorly regenerated group (grade III, IV). The independent factors influencing cartilage regeneration were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis. In addition, the functional results were compared before and after surgery between the two groups using the Knee Society score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC). Results: Age, sex, body mass index, postoperative radiologic factors, and preoperative joint condition did not affect the degree of cartilage regeneration significantly. The large cartilage defect (≥2.0 cm2) (p=0.011) and the presence of kissing lesions (p=0.027) were associated with poor cartilage regeneration. No significant difference in the KSS and WOMAC scores was observed between the group with good and poor cartilage regeneration. Conclusion: The presence of a large cartilage defect and kissing lesions is associated with poor cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy and microfracture. On the other hand, the degree of the regenerated cartilage did not show any correlation with the functional outcome.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kfuri M, Lobenhoffer P. High tibial osteotomy for the correction of varus knee deformity. J Knee Surg. 2017;30:409-20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603757
  2. Santoso MB, Wu L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0552-9
  3. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (UKOA): unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or high tibial osteotomy (HTO)? Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;4:307-13.
  4. Sun H, Zhou L, Li F, Duan J. Comparison between closing-wedge and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2017;30:158-65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584189
  5. Agarwala S, Sobti A, Naik S, Chaudhari S. Comparison of closing-wedge and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies for medial compartment osteoarthritis of knee in Asian population: mid-term follow-up. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016;7:272-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2016.06.012
  6. Bekkers JE, Inklaar M, Saris DB. Treatment selection in articular cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37 Suppl 1:148S-55S.
  7. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, Lee JS, Jeong JH. Comparison of results of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without subchondral drilling. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:673-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.035
  8. Spahn G, Klinger HM, Harth P, Hofmann GO. [Cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy. Results of an arthroscopic study]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012;150:272-9. German. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298388
  9. Matsunaga D, Akizuki S, Takizawa T, Yamazaki I, Kuraishi J. Repair of articular cartilage and clinical outcome after osteotomy with microfracture or abrasion arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis. Knee. 2007;14:465-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2007.06.008
  10. Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, Kusayama Y, Koshino T, Saito T. Factors affecting cartilage repair after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:779-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4096-z
  11. Kim CW, Seo SS, Lee CR, Gwak HC, Kim JH, Jung SG. Factors affecting articular cartilage repair after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee. 2017;24:1099-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.06.001
  12. Kim KI, Seo MC, Song SJ, Bae DK, Kim DH, Lee SH. Change of chondral lesions and predictive factors after medial openwedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked plate system. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1615-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517694864
  13. Schuster P, Schulz M, Mayer P, Schlumberger M, Immendoerfer M, Richter J. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and combined abrasion/microfracture in severe medial osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: 5-year results and arthroscopic findings after 2 years. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:1279-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.010
  14. Brandon ML, Haynes PT, Bonamo JR, Flynn MI, Barrett GR, Sherman MF. The association between posterior-inferior tibial slope and anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:894-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.098
  15. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149-60. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  16. Brittberg M, Peterson L. Introduction of an articular cartilage classification. ICRS Newsletter. 1998;1:5-8.
  17. Smith GD, Taylor J, Almqvist KF, et al. Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair: a validation study of 2 scoring systems. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1462-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.007
  18. Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH, Heo DB, Kim TJ. Survival analysis of microfracture in the osteoarthritic knee-minimum 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.09.006
  19. Koshino T, Wada S, Ara Y, Saito T. Regeneration of degenerated articular cartilage after high tibial valgus osteotomy for medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee. 2003;10:229-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00005-X
  20. Tsukada S, Wakui M. Is overcorrection preferable for repair of degenerated articular cartilage after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:785-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3655-z
  21. LaPrade RF, Oro FB, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Walsh MP. Patellar height and tibial slope after opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:160-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509342701
  22. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP. Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:366-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.024
  23. Allaire R, Muriuki M, Gilbertson L, Harner CD. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Similar to total meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1922-31. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00748
  24. Forkel P, Herbort M, Schulze M, et al. Biomechanical consequences of a posterior root tear of the lateral meniscus: stabilizing effect of the meniscofemoral ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:621-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1716-7
  25. Harner CD, Mauro CS, Lesniak BP, Romanowski JR. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91 Suppl 2:257-70.
  26. Ding C, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, et al. Knee meniscal extrusion in a largely non-osteoarthritic cohort: association with greater loss of cartilage volume. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:R21. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2132
  27. Takahashi K, Hashimoto S, Nakamura H, et al. Medial meniscal posterior root/horn radial tears correlate with cartilage degeneration detected by T1ρ relaxation mapping. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1098-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.008
  28. Krych AJ, Reardon PJ, Johnson NR, et al. Non-operative management of medial meniscus posterior horn root tears is associated with worsening arthritis and poor clinical outcome at 5-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:383-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4359-8
  29. Sterett WI, Steadman JR, Huang MJ, Matheny LM, Briggs KK. Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee: survivorship analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1420-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509360403