Computers and Concrete

  • 제27권6호
  • /
  • Pages.513-521
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1598-8198(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-818X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of infill wall properties on seismic response of RC structures

  • 투고 : 2019.07.22
  • 심사 : 2021.04.12
  • 발행 : 2021.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Brick infill walls (BIW) have significant effects on reinforced concrete (RC) structures' seismic performances. However, mechanical effects on the structural performance of BIWs, which are regarded as only weight at the design stage, are not considered in many seismic codes. Therefore, seismic performances of new and existing RC structures could not be realistically obtained. This study aims to investigate the effects on the structural behavior of BIWs, stucco types, and soft story. RC structures with and without BIWs are modeled by using the SAP2000 program. BIW is modeled with the equivalent diagonal compression strut method, and mechanical properties of BIWs plastered with conventional and polypropylene fibrous stuccos are taken from literature. Seismic performances of all structures are investigated using the pushover analysis method, according to Turkish Seismic Code-2007 (TSC-2007) principles. Besides, natural periods, rigidities, ductilities and energy dissipation capacities of all structures are obtained. As a result of analyses, it is determined that BIWs have significant effects on structural performances in terms of rigidity and ductility, and fibrous stucco considerably increases RC structures' rigidity and ductility. These walls can even lead to the collapse of structures in severe earthquakes if design engineers don't regard BIWs or BIWs are placed as asymmetric or deficient on the structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arisoy, B., Ercan, E. and Demir, A. (2015), "Strengthening of brick masonry with PVA fiber reinforced cement stucco", Constr. Build. Mater., 79, 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.093.
  2. Barghi, M. and Azadbakht, M. (2011), "Evaluating the effect of masonry infills on natural period of buildings with momentresisting frame", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 20(6), 649-660. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.540.
  3. CSI, SAP2000, Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures Basic Analysis Reference Manual, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, CA, USA.
  4. Dilmac, H., Ulutas, H., Tekeli, H. and Demir, F. (2018), "The investigation of seismic performance of existing RC buildings with and without infill walls", Comput. Concrete, 22, 439-447. https://doi.org/10.12989/CAC.2018.22.5.439
  5. El-Diasity, M., Okail, H., Kamal, O. and Said, M. (2015), "Structural performance of confined masonry walls retrofitted using ferrocement and GFRP under in-plane cyclic loading", Eng. Struct., 94(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.035.
  6. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
  7. Giaretton, M., Dizhur, D., Garbin, E., Ingham, J.M. and da Porto, F. (2018), "In-plane strengthening of clay brick and block masonry walls using textile-reinforced mortar", J. Compos. Constr., 22(5), 04018028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000866.
  8. Hermanns, L., Fraile, A., Alarcon, E. and A lvarez, R. (2011), "Performance of buildings with masonry infill walls during the 2011 Lorca earthquake", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 12(5), 977-1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9499-3.
  9. Kose, M.M. and Karslioglu, O. (2009), "Effects of infills on highrise buildings: a case study", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 18(8), 907-920. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.492.
  10. Kose, M.M. and Karslioglu, O. (2011), "Effects of infill walls on base responses and roof drift of reinforced concrete buildings undertime-history loading", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 20(3), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.535.
  11. Li, S., Kose, M.M., Shan, S. and Sezen, H. (2019), "Modeling methods for collapse analysis of reinforced concrete frames with infill walls", J. Struct. Eng., 145(4), 04019011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002285.
  12. Mainstone, R.J. (1974), "Supplementary note on the stiffness and strengths of infilled frames", Current Paper cp 13/74, Building Research Station, Garston, Watford, United Kingdom.
  13. Satta, S. and Liel, A.B. (2016), "Seismic performance of nonductile reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill wallsI: Development of a strut model enhanced by finite element models", Earthq. Spectra, 32(2), 795-818. https://doi.org/10.1193/90914eqs139m.
  14. Stavridis, A., Koutromanos, I. and Shing, P.B. (2012), "Shake- table tests of a three-story reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill walls", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 41(6), 1089-1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1174.
  15. TS500-2000 (2000), Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Ankara, Turkey.
  16. TSC-2007, Turkish Seismic Code, Ministry of Public Works & Settlement, Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara Turkey.
  17. Varum, H., Furtado, A., Rodrigues, H., Dias-Oliveir, J., VilaPouca, N. and Arede, A. (2017), "Seismic performance of the infill masonry walls and ambient vibration tests after the Ghorka 2015, Nepal earthquake", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15, 1185-1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9999-z.
  18. Yardim, Y. and Lalaj, O. (2016), "Shear strengthening of unreinforced masonry wall with different fiber reinforced mortar jacketing", Constr. Build. Mater., 102, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.095.