DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Cost-benefit analysis of Defense Improvement Project for Acquisition Alternative Analysis

방위력개선사업의 비용편익 분석을 통한 획득대안 분석 연구

  • Kim, Byung-Chan (Korea Research Institute for defense Technology planning and advancement) ;
  • An, Dan (Korea Research Institute for defense Technology planning and advancement)
  • 김병찬 (국방기술진흥연구소) ;
  • 안단 (국방기술진흥연구소)
  • Received : 2021.05.03
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.28

Abstract

Since the weapon system project has a large ripple effect on the country by investing a huge budget, analysis of acquisition methods that secured economic feasibility is required in the planning stage to promote the weapon acquisition project. In response to this demand, economic analysis for acquisition method is preformed in the research stage of previous studies, but the analysis on economic analysis for acquisition alternative is imperfect at the present. In this research, we identify the limitations of the effect analysis and propose an additional cost-benefit analysis method to analyze the economic feasibility of the acquisition alternative. It is possible to present the universal results of economic feasibility analysis for not only multiple alternatives but also single alternatives by presenting benefit/cost ratio. It is applied to research on acquisition project of OO guided rocket, and the result of economic analysis for each alternative is presented.

무기체계 획득사업은 막대한 예산을 투입하여 국가에 미치는 파급효과가 큰 특성이 있어 무기체계 획득사업을 추진하기 위한 기획연구 단계에서 경제적 타당성을 확보한 획득대안 분석이 요구되고 있다. 이러한 요구에 따라 획득연구 단계에서 획득대안에 대한 경제성 분석을 수행하고 있으나, 현재는 초기 단계로 경제적 분석에 따른 획득대안 분석에 대한 연구는 미비한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 현재 획득대안에 대한 의사결정 방법인 효과분석의 제한점을 식별하고 추가로 비용편익분석 방법을 제시하여 획득대안에 대한 경제성 분석 방법을 제안한다. 비용편익 분석의 결과를 비용/편익비율(Benefit/Cost Ratio)로 제시하여 복수 대안뿐만 아니라 단일 대안에 대한 경제성 분석이 가능하고, 경제적 타당성을 확보한 보편적인 결과 제시가 가능하다. 제시 방법을 OO 유도로켓 사업 획득연구에 적용하여 각 대안에 대한 경제성 분석결과를 제시한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by the research fund of KRIT(DTaQ)

References

  1. Defense Acquisition Program Administration. (2021). Defence Acquisition Program Act. Defense Acquisition Act(Online). http://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/sub.do?menuId=339
  2. Defense Acquisition Program Administration. (2021). Defence Acquisition Program Enforcement Ordinance. Defense Acquisition Act(Online). http://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/sub.do?menuId=339
  3. Defense Acquisition Program Administration. (2020). Defense Acquisition Program Management Regulation. DAPA administrative rule(Online). http://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/rlm/rllawd/RlmNttList.do?menuId=340
  4. H. J. Lee, K. W. Kim, J. H. Kim, D. An & B. Y. Choi. (2015). The study on Cost-benefit and Economical effects analysis regarding Military Weapon System - Focused on OOO Guided Rocket-. Journal of the Korean Association of defense Industry studies, 22(4), 22-48.
  5. Y. H. Lim. (2018). A Study on the Economic Analysis of the Defense Acquisition Projects -Focused on OO Guided Missile-. Journal of the Korea Academia -Industrial cooperation Society, 19(10), 394-400. DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.10.394
  6. J. Y. Lee. (2019). A Study on Analysis Model for Weapon Acquisition Alternatives. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(6), 91-96. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.6.091
  7. J. H. Kim & H. J. Lee. (2019). A Study on Selection of R&D Supervision Institution of Weapon Systems Using Delphi and AHP. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 20(10), 179-186. DOI : 10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.10.179
  8. T. L. Saaty. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process : Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York : McGraw-Hill.
  9. H. J. Seol, G. H. Kim, H. W. Jung, H. K. Cho & C. S. Hwang. (2009). A Study on the Selection of Alternatives for Flight Attendants to Adapt Flying Conditions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 12(4), 460-468.
  10. T. L. Saaty. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network process : Decision Making with Benefit, Opportunities, Costs, Risks. Pittsburgh : RWS Publications.
  11. K. W. Park, K. Y. Lee, C. H. Kim & S. Y. Choi. (2007). A Study on Knowledge-based Alternatives Analysis Model(KAAM) for the Best Decision Making in Weapon Systems Acquisition. Journal of the military operations research Society of Korea, 33(1), 1-8.
  12. H. J. U & S. K. Shin. (2005). The Utilization of Cost-Benefit Analysis for evaluating Weapon System Acquisition Program. The Quarterly journal of Defense Policy Studies, 21(3), 45-76.