DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Volumetric analysis of mucous retention cysts in the maxillary sinus: A retrospective study using cone-beam computed tomography

  • Hung, Kuofeng (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Hui, Liuling (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Yeung, Andy Wai Kan (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Wu, Yiqun (Second Dental Clinic, Department of Oral Implantology, Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) ;
  • Hsung, Richard Tai-Chiu (School of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology) ;
  • Bornstein, Michael M. (Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong)
  • Received : 2020.09.25
  • Accepted : 2020.12.04
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the volumetric characteristics of mucous retention cysts(MRCs) in the maxillary sinus and to analyze potential associations of MRCs with dentoalveolar pathologies. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans exhibiting bilateral maxillary sinuses that were acquired from January 2016 to February 2019 were initially screened. A total of 227 scans(454 sinuses) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. The presence, location, and volumetric characteristics of the diagnosed MRCs were evaluated on CBCT images using the 3D-Slicer software platform. The presence of MRCs was correlated with potential influencing factors including age, sex, and dentoalveolar pathology. For MRCs located on the sinus floor, factors with a potential impact on the volume, surface, and diameter were analyzed. Results: An MRC was present in 130 (28.6%) of the 454 sinuses. Most MRCs were located on the sinus walls and floor. The mean MRC volume, surface, and diameter were 551.21±1368.04 mm3, 228.09±437.56 mm2, and 9.63±5.40 mm, respectively. Significantly more sinuses with associated endodontically treated teeth/periapical lesions were diagnosed with an MRC located on the sinus floor. For MRCs located on the sinus floor, endodontic status exhibited a significant association with increased volume, surface, and diameter. Conclusion: Periapical lesions might be a contributing factor associated with the presence and volume of MRCs located on the sinus floor. The 3D-Slicer software platform was found to be a useful tool for clinicians to analyze the size of MRCs before surgical interventions such as sinus floor elevation procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. Harris D, Horner K, Grondahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1243-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02441.x
  2. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 921-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x
  3. Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140282. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140282
  4. Rosado LP, Barbosa IS, de Aquino SN, Junqueira RB, Verner FS. Dental students' ability to detect maxillary sinus abnormalities: a comparison between panoramic radiography and conebeam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2019; 49: 191-9. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.191
  5. Tadinada A, Fung K, Thacker S, Mahdian M, Jadhav A, Schincaglia GP. Radiographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus prior to dental implant therapy: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographic imaging. Imaging Sci Dent 2015; 45: 169-74. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.3.169
  6. Rege IC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonca EF. Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health 2012; 12: 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-12-30
  7. Friedland B, Metson R. A guide to recognizing maxillary sinus pathology and for deciding on further preoperative assessment prior to maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014; 34: 807-15. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2043
  8. Avsever H, Gunduz K, Karakoc O, Akyol M, Orhan K. Incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomographic images: paranasal sinus findings and nasal septum variations. Oral Radiol 2018; 34: 40-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-017-0283-y
  9. Chan HL, Wang HL. Sinus pathology and anatomy in relation to complications in lateral window sinus augmentation. Implant Dent 2011; 20: 406-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182341f79
  10. Tadinada A, Jalali E, Al-Salman W, Jambhekar S, Katechia B, Almas K. Prevalence of bony septa, antral pathology, and dimensions of the maxillary sinus from a sinus augmentation perspective: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Imaging Sci Dent 2016; 46: 109-15. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2016.46.2.109
  11. Shear M, Speight P. Cysts associated with the maxillary antrum. In: Shear M. Cysts of the oral and maxillofacial regions. Black-well: Oxford; 2007. p. 162-70.
  12. Kanagalingam J, Bhatia K, Georgalas C, Fokkens W, Miszkiel K, Lund VJ. Maxillary mucosal cyst is not a manifestation of rhinosinusitis: results of a prospective three-dimensional CT study of ophthalmic patients. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20037
  13. Nascimento EH, Pontual ML, Pontual AA, Freitas DQ, Perez DE, Ramos-Perez FM. Association between odontogenic conditions and maxillary sinus disease: a study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2016; 42: 1509-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.003
  14. Souza-Nunes LA, Verner FS, Rosado LP, Aquino SN, Carvalho AC, Junqueira RB. Periapical and endodontic status scale for endodontically treated teeth and their association with maxillary sinus abnormalities: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 2019; 45: 1479-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.09.005
  15. Curi FR, Pelegrine RA, Nascimento MD, Monteiro JC, Junqueira JL, Panzarella FK. Odontogenic infection as a predisposing factor for pathologic disorder development in maxillary sinus. Oral Dis 2020; 26: 1727-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13481
  16. Moon IJ, Lee JE, Kim ST, Han DH, Rhee CS, Lee CH, et al. Characteristics and risk factors of mucosal cysts in the paranasal sinuses. Rhinology 2011; 49: 309-14. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhino10.148
  17. Yeung AW, Tanaka R, Khong PL, von Arx T, Bornstein MM. Frequency, location, and association with dental pathology of mucous retention cysts in the maxillary sinus. A radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 1175-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2206-z
  18. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30: 1323-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
  19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  20. Rodrigues CD, Freire GF, Silva LB, Fonseca da Silveira MM, Estrela C. Prevalence and risk factors of mucous retention cysts in a Brazilian population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 480-3. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/48774803
  21. Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S, Soikkonen K, Norblad A. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: results from the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e80-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.031
  22. Bosio JA, Tanaka O, Rovigatti E, de Gruner SK. The incidence of maxillary sinus retention cysts in orthodontic patients. World J Orthod 2009; 10: e7-8.
  23. Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A, Sendi P, Katsaros C. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01502.x
  24. Phothikhun S, Suphanantachat S, Chuenchompoonut V, Nisapakultorn K. Cone-beam computed tomographic evidence of the association between periodontal bone loss and mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinus. J Periodontol 2012; 83: 557-64. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110376
  25. Omezli MM, Torul D, Cankaya S. Frequency and characteristics of retention cysts in the maxillary sinus in a Turkish patient population. Int J Stomatol Occlusion Med 2015; 8: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12548-015-0120-z
  26. Tercanli Alkis H, Kurtuldu E, Bilge NH, Yilmaz S, Bilge OM. Environmental temperature and air humidity and prevalence of maxillary sinus retention cysts: possible relationships (preliminary study). Oral Radiol 2018; 35: 296-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0362-8
  27. Kauke M, Safi AF, Grandoch A, Nickenig HJ, Zoller J, Kreppel M. Volumetric analysis of keratocystic odontogenic tumors and non-neoplastic jaw cysts - comparison and its clinical relevance. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018; 46: 257-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.012
  28. Cohen O, Warman M, Fried M, Shoffel-Havakuk H, Adi M, Halperin D, et al. Volumetric analysis of the maxillary, sphenoid and frontal sinuses: a comparative computerized tomography based study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2018; 45: 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2017.03.003
  29. Wallner J, Schwaiger M, Hochegger K, Gsaxner C, Zemann W, Egger J. A review on multiplatform evaluations of semi-automatic open-source based image segmentation for cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2019; 182: 105102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105102
  30. Velazquez ER, Parmar C, Jermoumi M, Mak RH, van Baardwijk A, Fennessy FM, et al. Volumetric CT-based segmentation of NSCLC using 3D-Slicer. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 3529. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03529
  31. Danesh-Sani SA, Loomer PM, Wallace SS. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus floor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54: 724-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.05.008
  32. Yu H, Qiu L. Histological and clinical outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous removal of a maxillary sinus pseudocyst. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019; 21: 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12708
  33. Delilbasi C, Gurler G, Burgaz I. Sinus lifting in the presence of pseudocyst: case series. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014; 13: 959-62.
  34. Gong T, Hu C, Chen Y, Zhou N, Wu H, Man Y. Raising the transcrestal sinus floor in the presence of antral pseudocysts, and in sinus floors with a normal Schneiderian membrane: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 57: 466-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.04.007
  35. Wang JH, Jang YJ, Lee BJ. Natural course of retention cysts of the maxillary sinus: long-term follow-up results. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 341-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000250777.52882.7a