DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Features and Radiological Differential Diagnoses of Symptomatic Sesamoid Bones and Accessory Ossicles: A Pictorial Essay

증상이 있는 종자골과 부골의 임상적 소견과 영상적 감별진단: 임상화보

  • Hyun Gun Kim (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hee Young Choi (Department of Radiology, DongSuWon General Hospital) ;
  • Ji Seon Park (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kyung Nam Ryu (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • So Young Park (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Wook Jin (Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • 김현균 (경희대학교 의과대학 경희대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 최희영 (동수원병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 박지선 (경희대학교 의과대학 경희대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 류경남 (경희대학교 의과대학 경희대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 박소영 (경희대학교 의과대학 강동경희대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 진욱 (경희대학교 의과대학 강동경희대학교병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2020.02.15
  • Accepted : 2020.07.03
  • Published : 2021.01.01

Abstract

Sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles are normal anatomic variants with varying morphological appearances and incidences. They are usually small osseous fragments with well-corticated margins located adjacent to the joint space and bone. Patients with sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles are usually asymptomatic and commonly encountered in clinical practice. These sesamoids and accessory bones are occasionally painful because of fractures, dislocations, degenerative changes, avascular necrosis, accessory bone infections, or abnormalities of the adjacent tissue, such as nerve entrapment, tenosynovitis, or soft tissue impingement. This article aimed to illustrate the imaging features of symptomatic sesamoids bones and accessory ossicles at various anatomic locations and describe their clinical features and radiological differential diagnosis.

종자골과 부골은 정상 해부학적 변이로 그 빈도와 형태는 다양하며 일반적으로 크기가 작고 둥근 모양으로 피질로 잘 둘러싸여 있고 뼈나 관절 주위에 인접하여 관찰되고 드물게 이분 혹은 다분 형태를 보일 수 있다. 대부분의 종자골과 부골은 무증상이며 판독 업무 중에 흔히 마주치게 된다. 하지만 때때로 종자골과 부골이 증상을 일으킬 수 있는데, 종자골과 부골 자체의 골절이나 탈구, 관절염, 골괴사, 감염 등의 질환이 이환되거나, 주변에 신경압박이나 건초염, 연부조직의 포착 등에 의하여 증상을 유발할 수 있다. 이 종설에서는 다양한 해부학적 위치에서 발생한 증상이 있는 종자골과 부골의 영상을 보고, 이들의 임상적 양상과 영상의학적 감별진단을 정리해보고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nwawka OK, Hayashi D, Diaz LE, Goud AR, Arndt WF 3rd, Roemer FW, et al. Sesamoids and accessory ossicles of the foot: anatomical variability and related pathology. Insights Imaging 2013;4:581-593 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0277-1
  2. Sarrafian SK. Anatomy of the foot and ankle. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1993:89-112
  3. Staubli HU, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Rincon L, Nolte LP. Quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament: cryosectional anatomy and structural properties in young adults. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1996;4:100-110 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01477262
  4. Ogden JA. Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. X. Patella and tibial tuberosity. Skeletal Radiol 1984;11:246-257 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351348
  5. Saupe H. Primare knochenmarkseiterung der kniescheibe. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 1943;258:386-392 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02793437
  6. Oohashi Y, Koshino T, Oohashi Y. Clinical features and classification of bipartite or tripartite patella. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:1465-1469 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1047-y
  7. Scapinelli R. Blood supply of the human patella. Its relation to ischaemic necrosis after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967;49:563-570 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.49B3.563
  8. Ishikawa H, Sakurai A, Hirata S, Ohno O, Kita K, Sato T, et al. Painful bipartite patella in young athletes. The diagnostic value of skyline views taken in squatting position and the results of surgical excision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;305:223-228 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199408000-00027
  9. Duncan W, Dahm DL. Clinical anatomy of the fabella. Clin Anat 2003;16:448-449 https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10137
  10. Kawashima T, Takeishi H, Yoshitomi S, Ito M, Sasaki H. Anatomical study of the fabella, fabellar complex and its clinical implications. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:611-616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0259-4
  11. Minowa T, Murakami G, Kura H, Suzuki D, Han SH, Yamashita T. Does the fabella contribute to the reinforcement of the posterolateral corner of the knee by inducing the development of associated ligaments? J Orthop Sci 2004;9:59-65 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-003-0739-2
  12. Kuur E. Painful fabella. A case report with review of the literature. Acta Orthop Scand 1986;57:453-454 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678609014771
  13. Zipple JT, Hammer RL, Loubert PV. Treatment of fabella syndrome with manual therapy: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003;33:33-39 https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2003.33.1.33
  14. Ehara S. Potentially symptomatic fabella: MR imaging review. Jpn J Radiol 2014;32:1-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0253-1
  15. Theodorou SJ, Theodorou DJ, Resnick D. Painful stress fractures of the fabella in patients with total knee arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1141-1144 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1230
  16. Akansel G, Inan N, Sarisoy HT, Anik Y, Akansel S. Popliteus muscle sesamoid bone (cyamella): appearance on radiographs, CT and MRI. Surg Radiol Anat 2006;28:642-645 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0134-8
  17. Karasick D, Schweitzer ME. Disorders of the hallux sesamoid complex: MR features. Skeletal Radiol 1998;27:411-418 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050410
  18. Sanders TG, Rathur SK. Imaging of painful conditions of the hallucal sesamoid complex and plantar capsular structures of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Radiol Clin North Am 2008;46:1079-1092 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2008.09.001
  19. McBryde AM Jr, Anderson RB. Sesamoid foot problems in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 1988;7:51-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5919(20)30958-3
  20. Dedmond BT, Cory JW, McBryde A Jr. The hallucal sesamoid complex. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:745-753 https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200612000-00006
  21. Julsrud ME. Osteonecrosis of the tibial and fibular sesamoids in an aerobics instructor. J Foot Ankle Surg 1997;36:31-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(97)80008-7
  22. Brown TI. Avulsion fracture of the fibular sesamoid in association with dorsal dislocation of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the hallux: report of a case and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;149:229-231 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198006000-00034
  23. Bessette BJ, Hodge JC. Diagnosis of the acute os peroneum fracture. Singapore Med J 1998;39:326-327
  24. Sobel M, Pavlov H, Geppert MJ, Thompson FM, DiCarlo EF, Davis WH. Painful os peroneum syndrome: a spectrum of conditions responsible for plantar lateral foot pain. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:112-124 https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500306
  25. Oh SJ, Kim YH, Kim SK, Kim MW. Painful os peroneum syndrome presenting as lateral plantar foot pain. Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36:163-166
  26. Bruce WD, Christofersen MR, Phillips DL. Stenosing tenosynovitis and impingement of the peroneal tendons associated with hypertrophy of the peroneal tubercle. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20:464-467 https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079902000713
  27. Brigido MK, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, Widman DS, Craig JG, Jamadar DA, et al. Radiography and US of os peroneum fractures and associated peroneal tendon injuries: initial experience. Radiology 2005;237:235-241 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2371041067
  28. Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvado E, Camins A, Danus M, Sauri A. Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2003;13 Suppl 4:L164-L177 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2011-8
  29. Arvin B, Fournier-Gosselin MP, Fehlings MG. Os odontoideum: etiology and surgical management. Neurosurgery 2010;66:22-31 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000366113.15248.07
  30. Fukuda M, Aiba T, Akiyama K, Nishiyama K, Ozawa T. Cerebellar infarction secondary to os odontoideum. J Clin Neurosci 2003;10:625-626 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-5868(03)00131-0
  31. Holt RG, Helms CA, Munk PL, Gillespy T 3rd. Hypertrophy of C-1 anterior arch: useful sign to distinguish os odontoideum from acute dens fracture. Radiology 1989;173:207-209 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.173.1.2781009
  32. Yammine K. The prevalence of Os acromiale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Anat 2014;27:610-621 https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22343
  33. Park JG, Lee JK, Phelps CT. Os acromiale associated with rotator cuff impingement: MR imaging of the shoulder. Radiology 1994;193:255-257 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090902
  34. Greditzer HG 4th, Hutchinson ID, Geannette CS, Hotchkiss RN, Kelly BT, Potter HG. Prevalence of os styloideum in national hockey league players. Sports Health 2017;9:469-473 https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738117707914
  35. Alemohammad AM, Nakamura K, El-Sheneway M, Viegas SF. Incidence of carpal boss and osseous coalition: an anatomic study. J Hand Surg Am 2009;34:1-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.08.025
  36. Kalantari BN, Seeger LL, Motamedi K, Chow K. Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones: spectrum of pathology and imaging evaluation. Appl Radiol 2007;36:28
  37. Arho AO. Accessory bones of extremities in roentgen picture. Duodecim 1940;56:399-410
  38. Zander G. "Os acetabuli" and other bone nuclei; periarticular calcifications at the hip-joint. Acta Radiologica 1943;24:317-327 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016924309137613
  39. Martinez AE, Li SM, Ganz R, Beck M. Os acetabuli in femoro-acetabular impingement: stress fracture or unfused secondary ossification centre of the acetabular rim? Hip Int 2006;16:281-286 https://doi.org/10.1177/112070000601600407
  40. DuBois DF, Omar IM. MR imaging of the hip: normal anatomic variants and imaging pitfalls. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010;18:663-674 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2010.09.003
  41. Randelli F, Maglione D, Favilla S, Capitani P, Menon A, Randelli P. Os acetabuli and femoro-acetabular impingement: aetiology, incidence, treatment, and results. Int Orthop 2019;43:35-38 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4151-0
  42. Bernaerts A, Vanhoenacker FM, Van de Perre S, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM. Accessory navicular bone: not such a normal variant. JBR-BTR 2004;87:250-252
  43. Brodsky AE, Khalil MA. Talar compression syndrome. Foot Ankle 1987;7:338-344 https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078700700606
  44. Karasick D, Schweitzer ME. The os trigonum syndrome: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:125-129 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571860
  45. Wakeley CJ, Johnson DP, Watt I. The value of MR imaging in the diagnosis of the os trigonum syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:133-136 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050049