DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding Silicone Breast Implant-Associated Complications for Radiologists

영상의학과 의사들을 위한 실리콘 유방 보형물 관련 합병증의 이해

  • Jeongmin Lee (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Sung Hun Kim (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jae Hee Lee (Human Medical Imaging & Intervention Center) ;
  • Boo Kyung Han (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 이정민 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김성헌 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 서울성모병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 이재희 (휴먼영상의학센터) ;
  • 한부경 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2020.12.19
  • Accepted : 2021.01.19
  • Published : 2021.01.01

Abstract

With the increase in the number of cases of silicone implant insertion either for cosmetic surgery or breast reconstruction after mastectomy, it is not unusual to encounter patients with silicone implants in clinical settings. Recently, the first case of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma was reported in Korea. In addition to previously known complications, such as implant rupture or contracture, the number of implant-associated imaging examinations has also increased. Considering this background, radiologists should have sufficient knowledge about the type of examination required in patients who have undergone implant insertion and imaging findings to correctly identify implant-associated complications. In this article, various complications of silicone implants are discussed, including various imaging findings, which radiologists should know.

미용적 성형 및 유방암 수술 후 재건의 목적으로 사용되는 실리콘 보형물의 사용이 국내외에서 크게 증가함에 따라 진료 영역에서 실리콘 보형물 삽입술을 받은 환자들을 어렵지 않게 접하게 되었다. 기존에 알려져 있던 보형물의 파열이나 구축과 같은 합병증 외에 최근에는 유방 보형물 연관 역형성 대세포 림프종과 같은 악성 종양과의 연관성도 보고되면서 보형물 관련한 영상 검사가 증가하고 있다. 이러한 상황에서 영상의학과 의사들은 보형물 삽입술을 받은 환자에 대해 어떤 검사가 필요하고 어떤 영상 소견이 보형물 관련 합병증을 시사하는지에 관한 충분한 지식을 갖추고 있어야 할 것이다. 본 종설에서는 영상의학과 의사들이 알아야 하는 실리콘 보형물의 다양한 합병증과 이들의 영상 소견에 대해 다루고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barbosa MR, Makris UE, Mansi IA. Association of breast implants with nonspecific symptoms, connective tissue diseases, and allergic reactions: a retrospective cohort analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147:42e-49e
  2. Coroneos CJ, Selber JC, Offodile AC 2nd, Butler CE, Clemens MW. US FDA breast implant postapproval studies: long-term outcomes in 99,993 patients. Ann Surg 2019;269:30-36
  3. Carr LW, Roberts J, Mericli AF, Liu J, Arribas EM, Clemens MW. Breast implant imaging surveillance among US plastic surgeons: US Food and Drug Administration recommendations versus clinical reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:1381-1387
  4. Raj SD, Karimova EJ, Fishman MDC, Fein-Zachary V, Phillips J, Dialani V, et al. Imaging of breast implant-associated complications and pathologic conditions: breast imaging. Radiographics 2017;37:1603-1604
  5. Kim JH, Paik NS, Nam SY, Cho Y, Park HK. The emerging crisis of stakeholders in implant-based augmentation mammaplasty in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e103
  6. Cordeiro PG, Ghione P, Ni A, Hu Q, Ganesan N, Galasso N, et al. Risk of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in a cohort of 3546 women prospectively followed long term after reconstruction with textured breast implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020;73:841-846
  7. Lim J. Are 'water drop' breast implants a ticking time bomb in the chest? Available at. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20190820000734. Published Aug 20, 2019. Accessed Nov 25, 2020
  8. Noels EC, Lapid O, Lindeman JH, Bastiaannet E. Breast implants and the risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Aesthet Surg J 2015;35:55-62
  9. Seiler SJ, Sharma PB, Hayes JC, Ganti R, Mootz AR, Eads ED, et al. Multimodality imaging-based evaluation of single-lumen silicone breast implants for rupture. Radiographics 2017;37:366-382
  10. Lowes S, MacNeill F, Martin L, O'Donoghue JM, Pennick MO, Redman A, et al. Breast imaging for aesthetic surgery: British Society of Breast Radiology (BSBR), Association of Breast Surgery Great Britain & Ireland (ABS), British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018;71:1521-1531
  11. Goldammer F, Pinsolle V, Dissaux C, Pelissier P. Accuracy of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a retrospective observational study of 367 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2020 [in press] doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2020.09.001
  12. FDA. Saline, silicone gel, and alternative breast implants. Available at. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/saline-silicone-gel-and-alternative-breast-implants (Docket number: FDA-2004-D-0124). Published Sep, 2020. Accessed Nov 25, 2020
  13. FDA. Risks and complications of breast implants. Available at. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breastimplants/risks-and-complications-breast-implants. Published Sep, 2020. Accessed Nov 25, 2020
  14. Kim SH, Lipson JA, Moran CJ, Shimakawa A, Kuo J, Ikeda DM, et al. Image quality and diagnostic performance of silicone-specific breast MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31:1472-1478
  15. Venkataraman S, Hines N, Slanetz PJ. Challenges in mammography: part 2, multimodality review of breast augmentation--imaging findings and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W1031-W1045
  16. Sutton EJ, Dashevsky BZ, Watson EJ, Tyagi N, Bernard-Davila B, Martinez D, et al. Incidence of benign and malignant peri-implant fluid collections and masses on magnetic resonance imaging in women with silicone implants. Cancer Med 2020;9:3261-3267
  17. Yang N, Muradali D. The augmented breast: a pictorial review of the abnormal and unusual. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W451-W460
  18. Wong T, Lo LW, Fung PY, Lai HY, She HL, Ng WK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast augmentation: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2016;7:399-410
  19. Hammond JB, Kosiorek HE, Cronin PA, Rebecca AM, Casey WJ 3rd, Wong WW, et al. Capsular contracture in the modern era: a multidisciplinary look at the incidence and risk factors after mastectomy and implantbased breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 2020 [in press] doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.020
  20. Georgieva M, Kammerer S, Prantl L, Jung F, Stroszczynski C, Jung EM. Imaging of breast implant and implant-associated complications: capsular contracture and intra- or extracapsular rupture. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2020;76:221-231
  21. Lindenblatt N, El-Rabadi K, Helbich TH, Czembirek H, Deutinger M, Benditte-Klepetko H. Correlation between MRI results and intraoperative findings in patients with silicone breast implants. Int J Womens Health 2014;6:703-709
  22. Moyer HR, Ghazi BH, Losken A. The effect of silicone gel bleed on capsular contracture: a generational study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:793-800
  23. Adams WP Jr, Culbertson EJ, Deva AK, R Magnusson M, Layt C, Jewell ML, et al. Macrotextured breast implants with defined steps to minimize bacterial contamination around the device: experience in 42000 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:427-431 
  24. Holmich LR, Vejborg I, Conrad C, Sletting S, McLaughlin JK. The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:213-225
  25. FDA. Medical device reports of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Available at. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/medical-device-reports-breast-implant-associatedanaplastic-large-cell-lymphoma. Published Aug, 2020. Accessed Nov 25, 2020
  26. Brody GS, Deapen D, Taylor CR, Pinter-Brown L, House-Lightner SR, Andersen JS, et al. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma occurring in women with breast implants: analysis of 173 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:695-705
  27. Doren EL, Miranda RN, Selber JC, Garvey PB, Liu J, Medeiros LJ, et al. U.S. epidemiology of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:1042-1050
  28. Keech JA Jr, Creech BJ. Anaplastic T-cell lymphoma in proximity to a saline-filled breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:554-555
  29. Leberfinger AN, Behar BJ, Williams NC, Rakszawski KL, Potochny JD, Mackay DR, et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review. JAMA Surg 2017;152:1161-1168
  30. Zucca E, Bertoni F, Vannata B, Cavalli F. Emerging role of infectious etiologies in the pathogenesis of marginal zone B-cell lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:5207-5216
  31. Srinivasa DR, Miranda RN, Kaura A, Francis AM, Campanale A, Boldrini R, et al. Global adverse event reports of breast implant-associated ALCL: an international review of 40 government authority databases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:1029-1039
  32. Hart AM, Lechowicz MJ, Peters KK, Holden J, Carlson GW. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34:884-894
  33. Jacombs A, Tahir S, Hu H, Deva AK, Almatroudi A, Wessels WLF, et al. In vitro and in vivo investigation of the influence of implant surface on the formation of bacterial biofilm in mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:471e-480e
  34. Granados R, Lumbreras EM, Delgado M, Aramburu JA, Tardio JC. Cytological diagnosis of bilateral breast implant-associated lymphoma of the ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell type. Clinical implications of peri-implant breast seroma cytological reporting. Diagn Cytopathol 2016;44:623-627
  35. Letter H, Rop B, Edison MN, Turner P. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a case report and literature review. Cureus 2016;8:e546
  36. Clemens MW, Jacobsen ED, Horwitz SM. 2019 NCCN consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Aesthet Surg J 2019;39:S3-S13
  37. McCarthy CM, Loyo-Berrios N, Qureshi AA, Mullen E, Gordillo G, Pusic AL, et al. Patient registry and outcomes for breast implants and anaplastic large cell lymphoma etiology and epidemiology (PROFILE): initial report of findings, 2012-2018. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143:65S-73S
  38. Adrada BE, Miranda RN, Rauch GM, Arribas E, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Clemens MW, et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: sensitivity, specificity, and findings of imaging studies in 44 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;147:1-14
  39. Ferrufino-Schmidt MC, Medeiros LJ, Liu H, Clemens MW, Hunt KK, Laurent C, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic impact of lymph node involvement in patients with breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2018;42:293-305
  40. Bengtson B, Brody GS, Brown MH, Glicksman C, Hammond D, Kaplan H, et al. Managing late periprosthetic fluid collections (seroma) in patients with breast implants: a consensus panel recommendation and review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:1-7
  41. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging, Lourenco AP, Moy L, Baron P, Didwania AD, diFlorio RM, et al. ACR appropriateness CriteriaⓇ breast implant evaluation. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:S13-S25
  42. Sharma B, Jurgensen-Rauch A, Pace E, Attygalle AD, Sharma R, Bommier C, et al. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: review and multiparametric imaging paradigms. Radiographics 2020;40:609-628
  43. Shah AT, Jankharia BB. Imaging of common breast implants and implant-related complications: a pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016;26:216-225
  44. Fleury EF, Rego MM, Ramalho LC, Ayres VJ, Seleti RO, Ferreira CA, et al. Silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC): similarities and differences with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and their differential diagnosis. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2017;9:133-140 
  45. de Faria Castro Fleury E, D'Alessandro GS, Lordelo Wludarski SC. Silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC): histopathology and radiological correlation. J Immunol Res 2018;2018:6784971
  46. Fleury EFC. Silicone induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC) diagnosis: breast magnetic resonance (BMR) sensitivity to detect silicone bleeding. PLoS One 2020;15:e0235050