Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Intellectual Structure of Domestic Open Access Area

국내 오픈액세스 분야의 지적구조 분석에 관한 연구

  • 신주은 (중앙대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 김성희 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.04.26
  • Accepted : 2021.05.20
  • Published : 2021.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, co-word analysis was conducted to investigate the intellectual structure of the domestic open access area. Through KCI and RISS, 124 research articles related to open access in Korea were selected for analysis, and a total of 1,157 keywords were extracted from the title and abstract. Network analysis was performed on the selected keywords. As a result, 3 domains and 20 clusters were extracted, and intellectual relations among keywords from open access area were visualized through PFnet. The centrality analysis of weighted networks was used to identify the core keywords in this area. Finally, 5 clusters from cluster analysis were displayed on a multidimensional scaling map, and the intellectual structure was proposed based on the correlation between keywords. The results of this study can visually identify and can be used as basic data for predicting the future direction of open access research in Korea.

본 연구에서는 국내 오픈액세스 분야의 지적구조 분석을 위해 동시출현단어 분석을 시행하였다. KCI와 RISS를 통해 수집한 국내 오픈액세스 관련 연구물 124편의 논문을 분석 대상으로 선정했으며, 제목과 초록에서 총 1,157개의 키워드를 추출하였다. 선정된 키워드를 대상으로 네트워크 분석을 시행하여 3개 영역과 20개 세부 군집으로 구분하여 제시하였다. 패스파인더 네트워크를 통해 키워드들의 지적 관계를 시각화하였으며, 가중 네트워크를 위한 중심성 분석을 통해 핵심 키워드를 확인하였다. 다음으로 군집분석을 실시하여 5개의 군집을 도출하고, 다차원 축적 지도상에 표시함으로써 키워드 간의 상관관계에 따른 지적구조를 제시하였다. 이러한 연구 결과는 국내 오픈액세스 분야의 지적구조를 시각적으로 파악할 수 있게 하며, 앞으로 국내 오픈액세스 연구의 방향성을 예측하는데 기초 자료로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2019년도 중앙대학교 CAU GRS 지원에 의하여 작성되었음

References

  1. Kwon, Seo-Jin (2017). A Comparative Study on the Current Status and Ethics in Research and Publication about Domestic and Reputable International Nursing Journals. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  2. Kim, Sun-Kyum, Kim, Wan-Jong, Seo, Tae-Sul, & Choi, Hyun-Jin (2019). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.333
  3. Park, Ok-Nam (2011). Knowledge structures in knowledge organization research. Journal Of The Korean Biblia Society For Library And Information Science, 22(3), 247-267. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2011.22.3.247
  4. Park, Ji-Yeon (2013). A Study of the Intellectual Structure of Library and Information Science in Korea. Doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
  5. Park, Han-Woo & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: a computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1387.
  6. Seo, Sang-Hyun & Lee, Yong-Gu (2018). A co-word analysis of titles, author keywords, and abstracts based in Korean LIS journals, 2015-2017. Korean Library And Information Science Society Winter Conference, 2018(2), 203-210.
  7. Seo, Sun-Kyung & Chung, Eun-Kyung (2013). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.1.207
  8. Ahn, Bu-Young & Song, Chi-Pyoung (2005). Construction of the bibliographic information network prototype for Biology & Life Science. Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 125-151. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.2.125
  9. Lee, Seon-Min (2016). An Analysis of Research Trend in Case Study of Art Therapy for Children at Inside and Outside of the Country. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  10. Lee, Soo-Sang (2012). Network Analysis Methods. Seoul: NonHyung.
  11. Lee, Soo-Sang (2014). A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049
  12. Lee, Jae-Yun (2006a). A study on the network generation methods for examining the intellectual structure of knowledge domains. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2), 333-355.
  13. Lee, Jae-Yun (2006b). Centrality measures for bibliometric network Analysis. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(3), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.3.191
  14. Lee, Jae-Yun (2006c). A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.215
  15. Lee, Jae-Yun (2007). A comparison analysis of various approaches to multidimensional scaling in mapping a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 335-357. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.3.200709.335
  16. Lee, Jae-Yun (2013). A comparison study on the weighted network centrality measures of tnet and WNET. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241
  17. Lee, Jae-Yun (2015). A generalized measure for local centralities in weighted networks. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(2), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.2.007
  18. Joung, Kyoung-Hee (2005). What factors affect the transition in scholarly communication? Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.183
  19. Jo, Hyo-Jeong & Lee, Yong-Gu (2018). Study on the intellectual structure of big data research in Library & Information Science using co-word analysis. Korean Library And Information Science Society Winter Conference, 2018(2), 211-219.
  20. Choi, Yi-Lang (2014). A study on the research trends of archival studies in Korea. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 147-177.
  21. Choi, Jae Hwang & Cho, Hyun Yang (2005). The recent trends of open access movements and the ways to help the cause by academic stakeholders. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.307
  22. Choi, Ji-Won (2016). An analytic review of vocation and employment research for youth in labor market by network text analysis. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 48(4), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.23840/agehrd.2016.48.4.183
  23. Han, Eun-Hyeung & Park, Eun-Hye (2020). Domestic and international research trends of early childhood teacher's practical knowledge using keyword network analysis. Educational Theory and Practice for Infants and Young Children, 5(2), 29-46.
  24. Chen, C. (2006). Information Visualization: Beyond the Horizon. London: Springer.
  25. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retieval research using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37(6), 817-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0
  26. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  27. Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. psychometrika, 29(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694
  28. Mokhtarpour, R. & Khasseh, A. A. (2020). Twenty-six years of LIS research focus and hot spots, 1990-2016: a co-word analysis. Journal of Information Science, 1-15.
  29. Oliveira, S., Moreira, C., Borbinha, J., & Garcia, M. A. (2015). Thematic identification of "little science": trends in the Portuguese literature in IS&LS by controlled vocabulary and co-word analysis. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4, 421-432.
  30. Olmeda-Go'mez, C., Ovalle-Perandones, M., & Perianes-Rodri'guez, A. (2017). Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985-2014. Scientometrics, 113, 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2486-8
  31. Onyancha, O. B. (2018). Forty five years of LIS research evolution, 1971-2015: an informetrics study of the author supplied keywords. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34, 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9590-3
  32. Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A., & Singh. S. N. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics(2005-2010). Scientometrics, 102, 929-955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1402-8
  33. Rodrigues, R. S., Taga, V., & Passos, M. F. d. (2016). Research articles about open access indexed by Scopus: a content analysis. Publications, 4(4), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4040031
  34. Sedighi, M. & Jalalimanesh, A. (2014). Mapping research trends in the field of knowledge management. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 19(1), 71-85.
  35. White, H. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 32(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
  36. Xu, F. & Ma, L. (2021). Exploring the research themes and their relationships of LIS in China from 2013 to 2018 using co-word analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 1-9.
  37. Zhao, R. & Wu, S. (2014). Study on themes and authors' influence of open access in China. Scientometrics, 101, 1165-1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1415-3