DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

케스케이드 방식 압축시스템 기반의 수소충전소에 대한 정성적 위험성평가

Consequence Analysis of Hydrogen Filling Stations based on Cascade Compressing Systems

  • 안병준 (한국교통대학교 대학원 안전공학과) ;
  • 임종국 (한국교통대학교 공과대학 안전공학전공)
  • Ahn, Byeong-Jun (Dept. of Safety Engineering, Graduate School, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • Rhim, Jong-Kuk (Dept. of Safety Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.05
  • 심사 : 2021.04.07
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30

초록

최근 수소자동차 보급의 확대로 수소충전소의 설치가 점차 확대될 예정이다. 본 연구에서는 수소충전소의 최악의 상황을 가정한 시나리오를 기반으로 피해규모를 예측하고 보다 안전한 설계형태를 제안하고자 한다. 피해규모 예측 방법은 전산유체역학(CFD)을 이용한 Flacs solver를 사용하였으며 이전 연구자의 실험 결과와 비교하여 정확성을 검증하였다. 피해규모 예측은 수소누출과 폭발에 대해서 실시하였으며, 예측 대상은 실측치를 기반으로 한 KR model로 하였다. 그리고 비교검토 모델로는 천정이 없는 형태인 Roofless model을 선정하였다. 두 모델에 대하여 분석한 결과 KR model에서는 내부가 60 vol% 이상까지 수소가스가 누적·체류되는 현상을 확인 할 수 있었던 반면, Roofless model의 경우에는 누출 후 벽면을 타고 충전소 외부로 방출·확산되는 현상을 확인 할 수 있었다. 결론적으로 국내에 표준모델로 보급·확산되고 있는 수소충전소 모델보다는 천정이 없는 수소 충전소 형태가 안전상 유리한 것으로 검토되었다.

Because of the recent expansion of hydrogen vehicle supply, the installation of hydrogen filling station is expected to gradually expand. This study attempts to predict the damage scale and propose a safer design form based on the scenario that assumes the worst case of a hydrogen station. A Flacs solver using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to predict the damage scale, and the accuracy was verified by comparing it with the experimental results of previous researchers. The damage scale prediction was conducted for hydrogen leakage and explosion, and the prediction target was the KR model based on the measured values. And as a comparative review model, a roofless model was selected without a ceiling. As a result of analyzing the two models, it was possible to confirm the accumulation and retention of hydrogen gas up to 60 vol% or more in the KR model, whereas in the case of the Roofless model, the phenomenon of discharge and diffusion to the outside of the charging station by riding the wall after leakage. I was able to check. In conclusion, it was reviewed that the type of hydrogen charging station without ceiling is more advantageous for safety than the hydrogen filling station model.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2019년 한국교통대학교 지원을 받아 수행하였음

참고문헌

  1. Hyundai motors company, "Annual sales report of 2018 for investor relations", IR of Hyundai, (2018)
  2. Toyota, "December 2018 sales chart", Toyota News Release, (2019)
  3. Kohler, J., Wietschel, M., Whitmarsh, L., Keles, D. and Schade, W., "Infrastructure investment for a transition to hydrogen automobiles", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1237-1248, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.010
  4. Park, J., "Status of hydrogen station technology and policy", Prospectives of industrial chemistry, 21(3), 10-19, (2018)
  5. Kim, E., Lee, K., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Park, J. and Moon, I., "Development of Korean hydrogen fueling station codes through risk analysis", International journal of hydrogen energy, 36(20), 13122-13131, (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.053
  6. Nakayama, J., Sakamoto, J., Kasai, N., Shibutani, T. and Miyake, A., "Preliminary hazard identification for qualitative risk assessment on a hybrid gasoline-hydrogen fueling station with an on-site hydrogen production system using organic chemical hydride", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(18), 7518-7525, (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.143
  7. Kikukawa, S., Yamaga, F. and Mitsuhashi, H., "Risk assessment of hydrogen fueling stations for 70 MPa FCVs", International journal of hydrogen energy, 33(23), 7129-7136, (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.063
  8. Mogi, T., Kim, D., Shiina. H. and Horiguchi S., "Self-ignition and explosion during discharge of high pressure hydrogen", Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 21(2), 199-204, (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.008
  9. Kikukawa, S., Fuyume Y., and Hirotada M., "Risk assessment of hydrogen fueling stations for 70 MPa FCVs." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33.23, 7129-7136, (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.063