디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권5호
  • /
  • Pages.433-442
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생들의 SNS 이용과 사회적 지지와의 관계에서 SNS친구들의 반응성 인식 및 자아존중감의 조절 효과

The Moderating Roles of Perceived Responsiveness of SNS Friends and Self-Esteem in the Relationship between SNS Use and Perceived Social Support among College Students

  • 최정화 (한림대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Choi, Jounghwa (Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Hallym University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.07
  • 심사 : 2021.05.20
  • 발행 : 2021.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국내 대학생을 대상으로, 개인의 SNS이용과 사회적 지지 간의 관계에서 SNS 친구들의 반응 및 자아 존중감의 조절효과에 대해 살펴보았다. 전국의 대학생(여학생 N = 264, 남학생 N = 239)을 대상으로 실시한 설문조사자료를 활용해 회귀분석을 실시했다. 그 결과 SNS이용의 주효과는 나타나지 않았으나 SNS 친구들의 반응성 인식은 사회적 지지 인식에 대해 강한 주효과를 보였다. 또한 SNS 이용, SNS 친구들의 반응성 인식, 자아존중감 간의 삼원상호작용 효과가 나타났는데, 즉, 자아존중감이 낮은 대학생들 사이에서만 SNS 이용과 SNS 친구들의 반응성 인식 간의 상호작용 효과가 나타났다. 이러한 본 연구는 기존의 이론을 정교화하는데 기여하며, 대학생을 대상으로 한 SNS 기반 심리적 정신건강 중재 프로그램 설계를 위한 함의를 제공한다.

The present study explored the moderating roles of perceived responsiveness of SNS friends and self-esteem in the relationship between SNS use and perceived social support among college students. Using a panel owned by a research firm, a nationwide online survey was conducted (females N = 264, males N = 239). The results of regression analysis suggested that there is no significant main effect of SNS use but a significant main effect of perceived responsiveness of SNS friends. In addition, a three-way interaction effect was found among perceived responsiveness of SNS friends, SNS use, and self-esteem. This study contributes to elaboration of the extant research as well as providing practical implications to SNS-based intervention programs for college students' psychological well-being.

키워드

과제정보

This paper was supported by Hallym University Research Grant(HRF-202001220-001).

참고문헌

  1. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
  2. Zhang, R. (2017). The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on Facebook: An examination of stressful life events, social support, and mental health among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 527-537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.043.
  3. Zhang, R. (2017). The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on Facebook: An examination of stressful life events, social support, and mental health among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 527-537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.043.
  4. Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., yi Lin, L., Bowman, N. D., & Primack, B. A. (2016). Social media use and perceived emotional support among US young adults. Journal of community health, 41(3), 541-549. doi:/10.1007/s10900-015-0128-8.
  5. Liu, C., & Ma, J. (2018). Social support through online social networking sites and addiction among college students: The mediating roles of fear of missing out and problematic smartphone use. Current Psychology, 1-8. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0075-5.
  6. Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, E., & Larose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 69-78. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.053.
  7. Huang, C. (2017). Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(6), 346-354. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0758.
  8. Indian, M., & Grieve, R. (2014). When Facebook is easier than face-to-face: Social support derived from Facebook in socially anxious individuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 102-106. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.016.
  9. Appel, M., & Gnambs, T. (2019). Shyness and social media use: A meta-analytic summary of moderating and mediating effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 294-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.018.
  10. Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238.
  11. Dooley, M. K., Sweeny, K., Howell, J. L., & Reynolds, C. A. (2018). Perceptions of romantic partners' responsiveness during a period of stressful uncertainty. Journal of personality and social psychology, 115(4), 677-687. doi:10.1037/pspi0000134.
  12. Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2015). Responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 67-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001.
  13. Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic medicine, 38(5), 300-314. doi:10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003.
  14. Yildirim, M., & Celik Tanriverdi, F. (2020). Social Support, Resilience and Subjective Well-being in College Students. Journal of Positive School Psychology.
  15. Dong, Y., & Li, H. (2020). The relationship between social support and depressive symptoms among the college students of Liaoning, China: a moderated mediated analysis. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 25(3), 368-378. doi:10.1080/13548506.2019.1679844.
  16. Park, N., & Lee, S. (2014). College Students' Motivations for Facebook Use and Psychological Outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 601-620. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.966355.
  17. Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J. (2013). Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 721-727. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0521.
  18. Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2017). Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and adolescents' depressed mood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(10), 603-609. doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0156.
  19. Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives (Vol. 1): Pew Internet & American Life Project Washington, DC.
  20. Frison, E., Bastin, M., Bijttebier, P., & Eggermont, S. (2019). Helpful or Harmful? The Different Relationships Between Private Facebook Interactions and Adolescents' Depressive Symptoms. Media Psychology, 22(2), 244-272. doi:10.1080/15213269.2018.1429933.
  21. Li, X., Chen, W., & Popiel, P. (2015). What happens on Facebook stays on Facebook? The implications of Facebook interaction for perceived, receiving, and giving social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 106-113. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.066.
  22. Miller, L. C., & Berg, J. H. (1984). Selectivity and urgency in interpersonal exchange Communication, intimacy, and close relationships (pp. 161-205): Elsevier.
  23. Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Handbook of personal relationships.
  24. Bazarova, N. N., Choi, Y. H., Sosik, V. S., Cosley, D., & Whitlock, J. (2015). Social Sharing of Emotions on Facebook: Channel Differences, Satisfaction, and Replies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675297.
  25. Zell, A. L., & Moeller, L. (2018). Are you happy for me ... on Facebook? The potential importance of "likes" and comments. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 26-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.050.
  26. Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). The impact of daily stress on adolescents' depressed mood: The role of social support seeking through Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 315-325. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.070.
  27. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Causes and Consequences of Social Interaction on the Internet: A Conceptual Framework. Media Psychology, 1(3), 249-269. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0103_4.
  28. Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents' online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an "Internet-attribute-perception" model. Media Psychology, 10(2), 292-315. doi:10.1080/15213260701375686.
  29. van Ingen, E., & Wright, K. B. (2016). Predictors of mobilizing online coping versus offline coping resources after negative life events. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 431-439. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.048.
  30. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002.
  31. Lin, L., Sidani, J. E., Shensa, A., Radovic, A., Miller, E., Colditz, J. B., . . . Primack, B. A. (2016). Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 33(4), 323-331. doi:10.1002/da.22466.
  32. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(2), 228. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228.
  33. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  34. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment, 52(1), 30-41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
  35. Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Resibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274-302. doi:10.1111/sipr.12033.
  36. Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Need-to-belong theory. In P. A. M. V. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121-140). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  37. Utz, S., Muscanell, N., & Khalid, C. (2015). Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: A comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 141-146. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0479.
  38. Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 155-167. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084.