디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권5호
  • /
  • Pages.415-421
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

펨버타이징(femvertising)에 대한 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구 : 소비자 성별, 연령, 페미니즘에 대한 태도의 차이를 중심으로

Factors Affecting the Attitude of femvertising : focusing on the differences according to 'Gender', 'Age', 'Attitude to Feminism'

  • 김지은 (숙명여자대학교 홍보광고학과)
  • KIM, Ji-EUN (Department of Public Relations & Advertising, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.15
  • 심사 : 2021.05.20
  • 발행 : 2021.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

펨버타이징(Femvertising)은 여성의 권리증진(Empowerment)을 추구하는 광고 캠페인으로 최근 사회의 중요한 의제로 떠오른 페미니즘에 힘입어 국내외를 막론한 다양한 브랜드의 마케팅 전략으로 사용되고 있다. 본 연구는 성별, 연령, 페미니즘에 대한 태도와 같은 소비자의 특성에 따라 펨버타이징에 대한 태도의 차이가 있는지를 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구결과 소비자의 성별에 따라 펨버타이징에 대한 태도에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있으나 연령요인은 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았고, 페미니즘에 대한 태도는 펨버타이징에 대한 태도에 유의한 영향력이 있음이 검증되었다. 본 연구를 통해 펨버타이징이 단지 마케팅의 도구가 아닌 중요한 사회의제로 논의되는 발판이 마련될 수 있기를 기대한다.

Femvertising is an advertising campaign for women's rights, and has recently been used as a marketing strategy for various brands along with feminism, an important social discussion. This study analyzed the effect of consumer's factors such as gender, age, and attitude to feminism on advertising attitudes. As a result, the factor of 'gender' showed statistically significant differences about attitudes toward femvertising. but 'gender' factor was not. And 'attitudes to feminism' factors have proven to have a significant influence on attitudes toward femvertising. This study will serve as a platform for femvertising to be discussed as an important social agenda, not just a marketing tool.

키워드

과제정보

This paper was supported by Korean Womens's Associastion for communication studies and NS homeshoping in 2020.

참고문헌

  1. Abitbol, A., & Sternadori, M. (2016). You Act Like a Girl: An Examination of Consumer Perceptions of Femvertising. Quarterly Review of Business Disciplines, 3(2), 117-138.
  2. Drake, J. G. (2017). WAS EVANGELICAL FEMINISM REALLY FEMINISM?-Kristin Kobes DuMez. A New Gospel for Women: Katharine Bushnell and the Challenge of Christian Feminism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 288 pp. $29(cloth), ISBN 978-01-90205-645. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 16(2), 238-240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781416000773
  3. Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass communication and society, 1(3-4), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0103&4_4
  4. Becker-Herby, E. (2016). The Rise of Femvertising : Authentically Reaching Female onsumers. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/181494.
  5. Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2017). A Post-Feminist Outlook on Advertisement and Female Representation. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 19(2), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.16914/kjapr.2017.19.2.135
  6. Um, N. (2020). College Students' Perspectives on Femvertising through Focus Group Interview. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(11), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.11.501
  7. Han, K. & Kim, J. (2020). An Exploratory Study on Femvertising: Based on the Analysesof Consumer Perception Factors and Advertising Effectiveness. The Journal of Asian Women, 59(1), 7-41. https://doi.org/10.14431/jaw.2020.04.59.1.7
  8. Levy, J. C. (2008). Advertising to Women: Who Are We in Print and How Do We Reclaim Our Image?. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 2(4), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1300/J456v02n04_07
  9. D'enbeau, S. (2011). Sex, feminism, and advertising: The politics of advertising feminism in a competitive marketplace. Journal of communication inquiry, 35(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859910385457
  10. Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: a review of current research. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 761-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1203556
  11. Becker-Herby, E. (2016). The Rise of Femvertising: Authentically Reaching Female Consumers. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/181494.
  12. Castillo, M. (2014.10). These stats prove femvertising works. Adweek, October, 10 https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/these-stats-prove-femvertising-works-160704
  13. Sternadori, M., & Abitbol, A. (2019). Support for women's rights and feminist self-identification as antecedents of attitude toward femvertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 36(6). 740-750. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2018-2661
  14. Elhajjar, S. (2021). Attitudes toward femvertising in the Middle East: the case of Lebanon. Journal of Islamic Marketing.
  15. Jacobson, C., Katalin Abdallah, L., Liasse, D. , & Lund, E. (2018). Femvertising and its effects on brand image: A study of men's attitude towards brands pursuing brand activism in their advertising. LBMG Strategic Brand Management-Masters Paper Series.
  16. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of marketing, 53(2), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251413
  17. Marcus Reker, K. B. (2016). "Why Can't Run 'Like a Girl'Also Mean Win The Race?": Commodity Feminism and Participatory Branding as Forms of Self-Therapy in the Neoliberal Advertising Space. Scripps Senior Theses.Paper 759. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/759
  18. Marcus Reker, K. B. (2016). "Why Can't Run 'Like a Girl'Also Mean Win The Race?": Commodity Feminism and Participatory Branding as Forms of Self-Therapy in the Neoliberal Advertising Space.