Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제39권4호
  • /
  • Pages.383-399
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anti-collapse performance analysis of unequal span steel-concrete composite substructures

  • Meng, Bao (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology) ;
  • Li, Liangde (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology) ;
  • Zhong, Weihui (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology) ;
  • Tan, Zheng (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology) ;
  • Zheng, Yuhui (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.10
  • 심사 : 2021.04.15
  • 발행 : 2021.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In the study, three 1:3-scale unequal span steel-concrete composite substructures with top-seat angle and double web angle connection were designed and identified as specimens GTSDWA-0.6, GTSDWA-1.0, and GTSDWA-1.4. Pseudo-static tests and refined numerical model analysis were conducted to examine the anti-progressive collapse performance of a semi-rigid steel-concrete composite substructure. The results indicated that the failure modes of the three specimens revealed that the fracture occurred in the root of the long leg of the top/seat angle in tension at the connection. With increases in the span ratio of the left and right composite beams, the bearing capacities of the composite substructures decreased, and the corresponding displacement increased. With respect to GTSDWA-0.6 and GTSDWA-1.4, the resistance due to the short composite beam corresponded to 62% and 60%, respectively, and the total resistance provided by the short composite beam exceeded that of the long composite beam. With respect to GTSDWA-1.0, the resistance due to the left and right composite beams was similar. All three specimens underwent the flexure mechanism and flexure-axial mixed mechanism stages. They resisted the external load mainly via the flexure mechanism. Moreover, the addition of stiffeners on both sides of the top and seat angles is advantageous in terms of improving the collapse resistance and ductility of unequal span composite substructures.

키워드

과제정보

The research presented in the study is supported by the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China through Grant No. 51908449 and 51678476, Young talents program of Shaanxi Natural Science Basic Research Program through Grant No. 2020JQ-660, Scientific research plan projects of Shaanxi Education Department Program through Grant No. 20JK0713, and Talent Science and Technology of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology through Grant No. RC1827. All opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the study are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

참고문헌

  1. Adam, J.M., Parisi, F., Sagaseta, J. and Lu, X.Z. (2018), "Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century", Eng. Struct., 173, 122-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082.
  2. Alireza, K. and Hossein, O. (2018), "Evaluation of vierendeel peripheral frame as supporting structural element for prevention of progressive collapse", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(5), 549-556. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.5.549.
  3. Chen, C.H., Zhu, Y.F., Yao, Y. and Huang, Y. (2016), "Progressive collapse analysis of steel frame structure based on the energy principle", Steel Compos. Struct., 21(3), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.3.553.
  4. DoD (Department of Defense) (2013), Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. Unified facilities criteria (UFC) 4-023-03. Washington DC: DoD.
  5. Farazman, S., Izzuddin, B.A. and Cormie, D. (2013), "Influence of unreinforced masonry infill panels on the robustness of multistory buildings", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 27(6), 673-682. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000392.
  6. Florea, D., Ioan, M., Dan, D. and Petran, I. (2016), "Experimental testing and numerical analysis of 3D steel frame system under column loss", Eng. Struct., 113, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.022.
  7. Galal, M.A., Bandyopadhyay, M. and Banik, A.K. (2019), "Vulnerability of three-dimensional semirigid composite frame subjected to progressive collapse", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 33(3), 04019030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001297.
  8. GB50010-2010 (2010), Code for design of concrete structures. Ministry of Construction of China, Beijing, China.
  9. GB50017-2017 (2017), Standard for design of steel structures. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.
  10. GSA (General Service Administration) (2013), Alternate path analysis & design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance, Washington D C, USA: United States General Services Administration.
  11. Hadjioannou, M., Donahue, S., Williamson, E.B. and Engelhardt, M.D. (2018), "Large-scale experimental tests of composite steel floor systems subjected to column loss scenarios", J. Struct. Eng., 144(2), 04017184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001929.
  12. Harry, O.A. and Lu, Y. (2019), "Simplified theoretical model for prediction of catenary action incorporating strength degradation in axially restrained beams", Eng. Struct., 191, 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.043.
  13. Kang, S.B., Tan, K.H., Liu, H.Y., Zhou, X.H. and Yang, B. (2017), "Effect of boundary conditions on the behavior of composite frames against progressive collapse", J. Constr. Steel Res., 138, 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.005.
  14. Lew, H.S., Main, J.A., Robert, S.D., Sadek, F. and Chiarito, V.P. (2013), "Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. I: Experiments", J. Struct. Eng., 139, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000618.
  15. Li, G.Q., Li, L.L., Jiang, B.H. and Lu, Y. (2018), "Experimental study on progressive collapse resistance of steel frames under a sudden column removal scenario", J. Constr. Steel Res., 147, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.03.023.
  16. Li, H.H. and El-Tawil, S. (2014), "Three-dimensional effects and collapse resistance mechanisms in steel frame buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 140(8), A401407. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000839.
  17. Liu, X.G., Zhang, W.P., Gu, X.L. and Ye, Z.W. (2021), "Probability distribution model of stress impact factor for corrosion pits of high-strength prestressing wires", Eng. Struct., 230, 111686. https://doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111686.
  18. Lu, X.Z., Zhang, L., Lin, K.Q. and Li, Y. (2017), "Improvement to composite frame systems for seismic and progressive collapse resistance", Eng. Struct., 151, 861-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.006.
  19. Massimiliano, F. (2019), "Evaluation of dynamic increase factor in progressive collapse analysis of steel frame structures considering catenary action", Steel Compos. Struct., 30(3), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.3.253.
  20. Meng, B., Zhong, W.H., Hao, J.P., Song, X.Y. and Tan, Z. (2019), "Calculation of the resistance of an unequal span steel substructure against progressive collapse based on the component method", Eng. Struct., 182, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.053.
  21. Mirtaheri, M. and Abbasi Zoghi, M. (2016), "Design guides to resist progressive collapse for steel structures", Steel Compos. Struct., 20(2), 357-378. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.357.
  22. Starossek, U. (2009), Progressive Collapse of Structure, Thomas Telford, London, U. K.
  23. Stylianidis, P.M., Nethercot, D.A., Izzuddin, B.A. and Elghazouli, A.Y. (2015), "Modelling of beam response for progressive collapse analysis", Structures, 3, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.001.
  24. Stylianidis, P.M., Nethercot, D.A., Izzuddin, B.A. and Elghazouli, A.Y. (2016), "Study of the mechanics of progressive collapse with simplified beam models", Eng. Struct., 117, 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.056.
  25. Tian, L.M., Wei, J.P., Huang, Q.X. and Ju, J.W. (2021a), "Collapse-Resistant Performance of Long-Span Single-Layer Spatial Grid Structures Subjected to Equivalent Sudden Joint Loads", J. Struct. Eng., 147, 04020309. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002904.
  26. Tian, L.M., Wei, J.P., Huang, Q.X. and Ju, J.W. (2021b), "Progressive collapse resistance of single-layer latticed domes subjected to non-uniform snow loads", J. Constr. Steel Res., 176, 106433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106433.
  27. Wang, W., Fang, C., Qin, X., Chen, Y.Y. and Li, L. (2016), "Performance of practical beam-to-SHS column connections against progressive collapse", Eng. Struct., 106, 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.040.
  28. Yang, B., Tan, K.H., Xiong, G. and Nie, S.D. (2016), "Experimental study about composite frames under an internal column-removal scenario", J. Constr. Steel Res., 121, 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.001.
  29. Zhang, J.Z., Li, G.Q., Jiang, J. and Zhang, W.J. (2019), "Collapse resistance of composite framed structures considering effects of slab boundary restraints", J. Constr. Steel Res., 158, 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.03.020.
  30. Zhong, W.H., Meng, B., Hao, J.P. (2017), "Performance of different stiffness connections against progressive collapse", J. Constr. Steel Res., 135, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.04.021.