DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Milk production and composition of conventional and organic-fed Holstein dairy cows as affected by temperature and relative humidity

  • Joo, Jong Gwan (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Nogoy, Kim Margarette C. (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Jihwan (ThinkforBL Consultancy Services) ;
  • Chon, Sunil (ThinkforBL Consultancy Services) ;
  • Lee, Dong Hoon (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Choi, Seong Ho (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2020.10.08
  • Accepted : 2020.12.29
  • Published : 2021.03.01

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effects if ambient temperature (Ta), relative humidity (RH), and temperature-humidity index (THI) on milk production parameters such as milk yield, fat, protein, milk urea nitrogen (MUN), and lactose. A total of fifty (50) mid-lactating Korean Holstein cows (144 - 150 days postpartum) were randomly assigned to two groups in equal numbers (n = 25) according to the type of diet received: conventional feed, a mixture of 56: 44 ratio of roughage and concentrate mix, and organic feed containing 100% organic roughage. Temperature, RH, and THI were recorded daily and averaged monthly. Conventional group showed higher dry matter intake throughout the experiment and thus, showed higher total milk yield and milk composition such as milk fat, protein, and lactose content than organic milk. Milk of the conventional group showed higher polyunsaturated fatty acid concentration. Highest milk yield was observed in September (21.7℃, 82.4%RH) in conventional group (27.69 kg·day-1) and in June (21.4℃, 72.9%RH) in organic group (14.31 kg·day-1). In conventional group, milk yield was positively correlated with Ta and THI, and milk protein was negatively correlated with Ta, RH, and THI. In organic feeding, only the MUN among milk composition parameters showed a significant correlation where it showed a negative correlation with Ta, RH, and THI. Conventional feeding showed significantly higher milk yield, fat, protein, and lactose than organic feeding throughout the experiment, although, organic feeding showed to be less likely affected by Ta, RH, and THI than the conventional feeding.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Technology development Program(S2851626) funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea).

References

  1. Ammer S, Lambertz C, von Soosten D, Zimmer K, Meyer U, Danicke S, Gauly M. 2018. Impact of diet composition and temperature-humidity index on water and dry matter intake of high-yielding dairy cows. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 102:103-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12664
  2. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
  3. Armstrong DV. 1994. Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. Journal of Dairy Science 77:2044-2050. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)77149-6
  4. Bergamo P, Fedele E, Iannibelli L, Marzillo G. 2003. Fat-soluble vitamin contents and fatty acid composition in organic and conventional Italian dairy products. Food Chemistry 82:625-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00036-0
  5. Bleck GT, Wheeler MB, Hansen LB, Chester-Hones H, Miller DJ. 2008. Lactose synthase components in milk: Concentrations of α-Lactalbumin and β1,4-Galactosyltransferase in milk of cows from several breeds at vrious stages of Lactation. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 44:241-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.01047.x
  6. Bohmanova J, Misztal I, Cole JB. 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science 90:1947-1956. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-513
  7. Bouraoui R, Lahmar M, Majdoub A, Djemali M, Belyea R. 2002. The relationship of temperature-humidity index with milk production of dairy cows in a mediterranean climate. Animal Research 51:479-491. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2002036
  8. Butler G, Nielsen JH, Slots T, Seal C, Eyre MD, Sanderson R, Leifert C. 2008. Fatty acid and fat-soluble antioxidant concentrations in milk from high- and low-input conventional and organic systems: Seasonal variation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88:1431-1441. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3235
  9. Cabrita ARJ, Bessa RJB, Alves SP, Dewhurst RJ, Fonseca AJM. 2007. Effects of dietary protein and starch on intake, milk production, and milk fatty acid profiles of dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 90:1429-1439. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71628-4
  10. Carlsson J, Pehrson B. 1994. The influence of the dietary balance between energy and protein on milk urea concentration. experimental trials assessed by two different protein evaluation systems. Acta veterinaria Scandinavica 35:193-205. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03548347
  11. Choi C. 2018. Nutrient requirement for maintenance and nutritional changes of the hanwoo steers in early-fattening stage under heat stress. Korean Journal of Agricultral Science 45:74-83. [in Korean]
  12. Christie WW. 1979. The effects of diet and other factors on the lipid composition of ruminant tissues and milk. Progress in Lipid Research 17:245-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6832(79)90009-0
  13. Doska MC, Siva DFF, Horst JA, Valloto AA, Junior PR, Almeida R. 2012. Revista Brasileira de zootecnia sources of variation in milk urea nitrogen in Parana dairy cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41:692-697. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000300032
  14. Du Preez JH, Giesecke WH, Hattingh PJ. 1990. Heat stress in dairy cattle and other livestock under southern African conditions. I. Temperature-humidity index mean values during the four main seasons. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 57:77-87.
  15. Ellis KA, Innocent G, Grove-White D, Cripps P, McLean WG, Haward CV, Mihm M. 2006. Comparing the fatty acid composition of organic and conventional milk. Journal of Dairy Science 89:1938-1950. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72261-5
  16. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 1980. Influence of nutritional factors on the yield and content of milk fat: Dietary components other than fat [dairy cattle;rumen fermentation;glucose supply, amino acid supply]. FAO, Rome, Italy.
  17. Godden SM, Lissemore KD, Kelton DF, Leslie KE, Walton JS, Lumsden JH. 2001. Factors associated with milk urea concentrations in Ontario dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84:107-114. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74458-X
  18. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. 1970. Forage fibre analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agricultural Research Service,Washington, D.C., USA.
  19. Hoffman PC, Bauman LM. 2003. Strategies to improve milk yield of lactating dairy cows fed red clover silage. The Professional Animal Scientist 19:178-187. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31397-8
  20. Jahreis G, Fritsche J, Steinhart H. 1996. Monthly variations of milk composition with special regard to fatty acids depending on season and farm management systems-conventional versus ecological. Lipid/Fett 98:356-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/lipi.19960981103
  21. Korea Dairy Committee. 2017. Overview of the Korean dairy sector. Korea Dairy Committee, Sejong, Korea.
  22. Lim HJ, Ki KS. 2019. Effects of induced heat stress on temperature response and biochemistry: Alteration of biochemical constituents in Holstein calves by heat stress. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:637-643. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190050
  23. Liu J, Li L, Chen X, Lu Y, Wang D. 2019. Effects of heat stress on body temperature, milk production, and reproduction in dairy cows: A novel idea for monitoring and evaluation of heat stress. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 32:1332-1339. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0743
  24. Lock AL, Garnsworthy PC. 2003. Seasonal variation in milk conjugated linoleic acid and Δ9-desaturase activity in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 79:47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00118-5
  25. Moller S, Matthew C, Wilson GF. 1993. Pasture protein and soluble carbohydrate levels in spring dairy pasture and associations with cow performance. In proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 53:83-86.
  26. Muller-lindenlauf M, Deittert C, Kopke U. 2010. Assessment of environmental effects, animal welfare and milk quality among organic dairy farms. Livestock Science 128:140-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.013
  27. National Council Research. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Science, Washington, D.C., USA.
  28. Novak P, Vokralova J, Broucek J. 2009. Effects of the stage and number of lactation on milk yield of dairy cows kept in open barn during high temperatures in summer months. Archiv Tierzucht 52:574-586.
  29. Parodi PW. 2004. Milk fat in human nutrition. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 59:3-59.
  30. Ravagnolo O, Misztal I, Hoogenboom G. 2000. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, development of heat index function. Journal of Dairy Science 83:2120-2125. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75094-6
  31. Rius AG, Appuhamy JADRN, Cyriac J, Kirovski D, Becvar O, Escobar J, McGilliard ML, Bequette BJ, Akers RM, Hanigan MD. 2010. Regulation of protein synthesis in mammary glands of lactating dairy cows by starch and amino acids. Journal of Dairy Science 93:3114-3127. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2743
  32. Rodriquez LA, Mekonnen G, Wilcox CJ, Martin FG, Krienke WA. 1985. Effects of relative humidity, maximum and minimum temperature, pregnancy, and stage of lactation on milk composition and yield. Journal of Dairy Science 68:973-978. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(85)80917-6
  33. Schwendel BH, Wester TJ, Morel PCH, Tavendale MH, Deadman C, Shadbolt NM, Otter DE. 2015. Invited review: Organic and conventionally produced milk-an evaluation of factors influencing milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science 98:721-746. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8389
  34. Shahbazkia HR, Aminlari M, Tavasoli A, Mohamadnia AR, Cravador A. 2010. Associations among milk production traits and glycosylated haemoglobin in dairy cattle; importance of lactose synthesis potential. Veterinary Research Communications 34:1-9.
  35. Stiglbauer KE, Cicconi-Hogan KM, Richert R, Schukken YH, Ruegg PL, Gamorth M. 2013. Assessment of herd management on organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 96:1290-1300. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5845
  36. Thorsdottir I, Hill J, Ramel A. 2004. Short communication: seasonal variation in cis-9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid content in milk fat from nordic countries. Journal of Dairy Science 87:2800-2802. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73407-4
  37. University of Missouri college of Agriculture Agricultural Experiment Station. 1961. Environmental physiology and shelter engineering with special reference to domestic animals. University of Missouri college of Agriculture Agricultural Experiment Station, Missouri, USA.
  38. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2018. Korea-republic of dairy and proucts annual 2018 dairy and product. USDA, Washington, D.C., USA.
  39. Wardeh MF. 1981. Models for estimating energy and protein utilization for feed. Ph.D. dissertation, Utha State University, Utha, USA.
  40. Webster AJ. 1983. Environmental stress and the physiology, performance and health of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 57:1584-1593. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.5761584x
  41. West JW. 2003. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86:2131-2144. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X
  42. White SL, Bertrand JA, Wade MR, Washburn SP, Green Jr JT, Jenkins TC. 2001. Comparison of fatty acid content of milk from Jersey and holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 84:2295-2301. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74676-0

Cited by

  1. A novel dew point measurement system based on the thermal effect of humidity sensitive thin film vol.187, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110248