Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제78권3호
  • /
  • Pages.255-267
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computation of design forces and deflection in skew-curved box-girder bridges

  • 투고 : 2020.07.26
  • 심사 : 2021.02.19
  • 발행 : 2021.05.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The analysis of simply supported single-cell skew-curved reinforced concrete (RC) box-girder bridges is carried out using a finite element based CsiBridge software. The behaviour of skew-curved box-girder bridges can not be anticipated simply by superimposing the individual effects of skewness and curvature, so it becomes important to examine the behaviour of such bridges considering the combined effects of skewness and curvature. A comprehensive parametric study is performed wherein the combined influence of the skew and curve angles is considered to determine the maximum bending moment, maximum shear force, maximum torsional moment and maximum vertical deflection of the bridge girders. The skew angle is varied from 0° to 60° at an interval of 10°, and the curve angle is varied from 0° to 60° at an interval of 12°. The scantly available literature on such bridges focuses mainly on the analysis of skew-curved bridges under dead and point loads. But, the effects of actual loadings may be different, thus, it is considered in the present study. It is found that the performance of these bridges having more curvature can be improved by introducing the skewness. Finally, several equations are deduced in the non-dimensional form for estimating the forces and deflection in the girders of simply supported skew-curved RC box-girder bridges, based upon the results of the straight one. The developed equations may be helpful to the designers in proportioning, analysing, and designing such bridges, as the correlation coefficient is about 0.99.

키워드

과제정보

The authors acknowledge Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad for providing financial support under TEQIP- III.

참고문헌

  1. Agarwal, P., Pal, P. and Mehta, P.K. (2019), "Analysis of RC skew box girder bridges", Int. J. Sci. Innov. Eng. Tech., 6, 1-8.
  2. Agarwal, P., Pal, P. and Mehta, P.K. (2020), "Finite element analysis of skew box-girder bridges", J. Struct. Eng. (Madras), 47(3), 243-258.
  3. Agarwal, P., Pal, P. and Mehta, P.K. (2020), "Parametric study on skew-curved RC box-girder bridges", Struct., 28, 380-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.025.
  4. Bahadur, R., Upadhyay, A.K. and Shukla, K.K. (2017), "Static analysis of singly and doubly curved panels on rectangular planform", Steel Compos. Struct., 24(6), 659-670. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.6.659.
  5. CSiBridge, Analysis Reference Manual Version 20.0.0, Comput Struct Inc., Berkeley, CA.
  6. Deng, Y., Phares, B.M., Greimann, L., Shryack, G.L. and Hoffman, J.J. (2015), "Behavior of curved and skewed bridges with integral abutments", J. Constr. Steel Res., 30(109), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.03.003.
  7. Gupta, N., Agarwal, P. and Pal, P. (2019), "Analysis of RCC curved box girder bridges", Appl. Innov. Res., 1, 153-159.
  8. Gupta, N., Agarwal, P. and Pal, P. (2019), "Free vibration analysis of RCC curved box girder bridges", Int. J. Tech. Innov. Modern Eng. Sci., 5(2), 1-7.
  9. Gupta, T. and Kumar M. (2019), "Reaction response of horizontally curved and skewed concrete box-girder bridges", Rec. Adv. Struct. Eng., 1, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0362-3_4.
  10. Gupta, T. and Kumar, M. (2018), "Flexural response of skew-curved concrete box-girder bridges", Eng. Struct., 163, 358-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.063.
  11. IRC 21 (2000), Standard Specification and Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Section III-Cement Concrete (Planed and Reinforced), 3rd Edition.
  12. IRC 6 (2014), Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges, Section II, Loads & Stresses.
  13. Jawanjal, V.S. and Kumar, M. (2006), "Finite element analysis of skew-curved RC box girder bridges", Adv. Bridge Eng., 183-190.
  14. Khaloo, A.R. and Kafimosavi, M. (2007), "Enhancement of flexural design of horizontally curved prestressed bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 12(5), 585-590. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:5(585).
  15. Kumar, K., Kumar, A. and Panda, S.K. (2015), "Parametric resonance of composite skew plate under non-uniform in-plane loading", Struct. Eng. Mech., 55(2), 435-459. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.2.435.
  16. Lalanthi, M.C., Kamatchi, P., Balaji Rao, K. and Saibabu, S. (2018), "Methodologies for numerical modelling of prestressed concrete box-girder for long term deflection", Comput. Concrete, 21(3), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.3.269.
  17. Majeed, A.A., Allawi, A.A., Chai, K.H. and Badaruzzam, H.W. (2017), "Behavior of CFRP strengthened RC multicell box girders under torsion", Struct. Eng. Mech., 61(3), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.3.397.
  18. Miner, L.R. (2014), "Effect of abutment skew and horizontally curved alignment on Bridge reaction forces", Master's Thesis, California State University, Sacramento.
  19. Mohseni, I. and Rashid, A.R. (2013), "Transverse load distribution of skew cast-in-place concrete multicell box-girder bridges subjected to traffic condition", Lat. Am. J. Solid. Struct., 10, 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252013000200002.
  20. Panayotounakos, D.E. and Theocaris, P. (1979), "Flexibility matrix for skew-curved beams", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 15(10), 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(79)90004-0.
  21. Puckett, J.A., Huo, X.S., Patrick, M.D., Jablln, M.C., Mertz, D. and Peavy, M.D. (2005), "Simplified live load distribution factor equations for bridge design", Tran. Res. Rec., 11(S), 67-78.
  22. Sisodiya, R.G., Cheung, Y.K. and Ghali, A. (1970), "Finite element analysis of skew, curved box-girder bridge", Publ. Kajima Inst. Constr. Technol. JPN, 30, 191-199.
  23. Wilson, T., Mahmoud, H. and Chen. S. (2014), "Seismic performance of skewed and curved reinforced concrete bridges in mountainous states", Eng. Struct., 1(70), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.039.