DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of extraction treatment on upper airway dimensions in patients with bimaxillary skeletal protrusion relative to their vertical skeletal pattern

  • Cho, Ha-Nul (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Yoon, Hyun Joo (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Jae Hyun (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Young-Guk (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Jung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2020.06.03
  • Accepted : 2020.12.09
  • Published : 2021.05.25

Abstract

Objective: To investigate dimensional changes in regional pharyngeal airway spaces after premolar extraction in bimaxillary skeletal protrusion (BSP) patients according to vertical skeletal pattern, and to further identify dentoskeletal risk factors to predict posttreatment pharyngeal changes. Methods: Fifty-five adults showing BSP treated with microimplant anchorage after four premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the mandibular plane steepness: hyperdivergent (Frankfort horizontal plane to mandibular plane [FH-MP] ≥ 30) and nonhyperdivergent groups (FH-MP < 30). The control group consisted of 20 untreated adults with skeletal Class I normodivergent pattern and favorable profile. Treatment changes in cephalometric variables were evaluated and compared. The association between posttreatment changes in the dentoskeletal and upper airway variables were analyzed using linear regression analysis. Results: The BSP patients showed no significant decrease in the pharyngeal dimensions to the lower level in comparison with controls, except for middle airway space (MAS, p < 0.01). The upper airway variable representing greater decrease in the hyperdivergent group than in the nonhyperdivergent group was the MAS (p < 0.01). Posttreatment changes in FH-MP had negative correlation with changes in MAS (β = -0.42, p < 0.01) and inferior airway space (β = -0.52, p < 0.01) as a result of multivariable regression analysis adjusted for sagittal skeletal relationship. Conclusions: Decreased pharyngeal dimensions after treatment in BSP patients showed no significant difference from the normal range of pharyngeal dimensions. However, the glossopharyngeal airway space may be susceptible to treatment when vertical dimension increased in hyperdivergent BSP patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim TK, Ryu YK. Lip profile changes after orthodontic tooth movement in female adult with bimaxillary protrusion. Korean J Orthod 1994;24:135-48.
  2. Chu YM, Po-Hsun Chen R, Morris DE, Wen-Ching Ko E, Chen YR. Surgical approach to the patient with bimaxillary protrusion. Clin Plast Surg 2007;34:535-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.006
  3. Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod 2005;75:333-9.
  4. Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Licciardello V, Barbato E. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2010;80:211-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/010709-16.1
  5. Uesugi S, Imamura T, Kokai S, Ono T. Cone-beam computed tomography-based diagnosis and treatment simulation for a patient with a protrusive profile and a gummy smile. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:189-99. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.189
  6. Sharma K, Shrivastav S, Sharma N, Hotwani K, Murrell MD. Effects of first premolar extraction on airway dimensions in young adolescents: a retrospective cephalometric appraisal. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:190-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.132314
  7. Valiathan M, El H, Hans MG, Palomo MJ. Effects of extraction versus non-extraction treatment on oropharyngeal airway volume. Angle Orthod 2010;80:1068-74. https://doi.org/10.2319/010810-19.1
  8. Jones AG, Bhatia S. A study of nasal respiratory resistance and craniofacial dimensions in white and West Indian black children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:34-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70018-4
  9. Chen Y, Hong L, Wang CL, Zhang SJ, Cao C, Wei F, et al. Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients. Angle Orthod 2012;82:964-70. https://doi.org/10.2319/110211-675.1
  10. Wang Q, Jia P, Anderson NK, Wang L, Lin J. Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of Class I bimaxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod 2012;82:115-21. https://doi.org/10.2319/011011-13.1
  11. Al Maaitah E, El Said N, Abu Alhaija ES. First premolar extraction effects on upper airway dimension in bimaxillary proclination patients. Angle Orthod 2012;82:853-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/101711-646.1
  12. Zheng ZH, Yamaguchi T, Kurihara A, Li HF, Maki K. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway in patients with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014;17:38-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12029
  13. Baik UB, Suzuki M, Ikeda K, Sugawara J, Mitani H. Relationship between cephalometric characteristics and obstructive sites in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Angle Orthod 2002;72:124-34.
  14. Joseph AA, Elbaum J, Cisneros GJ, Eisig SB. A cephalometric comparative study of the soft tissue airway dimensions in persons with hyperdivergent and normodivergent facial patterns. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:135-9; discussion 139-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90850-3
  15. Ucar FI, Uysal T. Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 2011;81:460-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/091910-545.1
  16. Behrents RG, Shelgikar AV, Conley RS, Flores-Mir C, Hans M, Levine M, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and orthodontics: an American Association of Orthodontists White Paper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:13-28.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.009
  17. Marsan G, Cura N, Emekli U. Changes in pharyngeal (airway) morphology in Class III Turkish female patients after mandibular setback surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:341-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.03.001
  18. Keum BT, Choi SH, Choi YJ, Baik HS, Lee KJ. Effects of bodily retraction of mandibular incisors versus mandibular setback surgery on pharyngeal airway space: a comparative study. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:344-52. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.6.344
  19. Germec-Cakan D, Taner T, Akan S. Uvulo-glossopharyngeal dimensions in non-extraction, extraction with minimum anchorage, and extraction with maximum anchorage. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:515-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq109
  20. Iwasaki T, Saitoh I, Takemoto Y, Inada E, Kakuno E, Kanomi R, et al. Tongue posture improvement and pharyngeal airway enlargement as secondary effects of rapid maxillary expansion: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:235-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.014
  21. Hu Z, Yin X, Liao J, Zhou C, Yang Z, Zou S. The effect of teeth extraction for orthodontic treatment on the upper airway: a systematic review. Sleep Breath 2015;19:441-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-015-1122-1
  22. Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK. Sagittal mandibular development effects on the dimensions of the awake pharyngeal airway passage. Angle Orthod 2010;80:1061-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/030210-125.1
  23. Zheng Z, Liu H, Xu Q, Wu W, Du L, Chen H, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the upper airway response to large incisor retraction in adult class I bimaxillary protrusion patients. Sci Rep 2017;7:45706. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45706
  24. Eggensperger N, Smolka W, Iizuka T. Long-term changes of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal airway size following mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2005;33:111-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2004.10.004
  25. Zinchuk AV, Gentry MJ, Concato J, Yaggi HK. Phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea: a definition, examples and evolution of approaches. Sleep Med Rev 2017;35:113-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2016.10.002

Cited by

  1. Personalized Orthodontics: From the Sagittal Position of Lower Incisors to the Facial Profile Esthetics vol.11, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080692