대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제51권3호
  • /
  • Pages.157-165
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of different micro-osteoperforation depths on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A single-center, single-blind, randomized clinical trial

  • Ozkan, Tugba Haliloglu (Department of Oral and Dental Health Program, Uskudar University Vocational School of Health Services) ;
  • Arici, Selim (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.03
  • 심사 : 2020.12.07
  • 발행 : 2021.05.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: This study aimed to identify the clinical effectiveness of two different penetration depths of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Methods: Twenty-four patients requiring the removal of the upper first premolar teeth were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The control group participants did not undergo MOPs. Participants in the experimental group underwent three MOPs each at 4-mm (MOP-4) and 7-mm (MOP-7) depths, which were randomly and equally performed to either the left or right side distal to the canine. The retraction amount was measured on three-dimensional digital models on the 28th day of retraction. MOP-related pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Between-group statistical differences in the VAS scores were determined using an independent t-test and those in canine retraction were determined using analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey test. Results: No significant difference was found between the MOP-4 (1.22 ± 0.29 mm/month) and MOP-7 (1.29 ± 0.31 mm/month) groups in terms of the canine retraction rate. Moreover, both the groups demonstrated a significantly higher canine movement than the control group (0.88 ± 0.19 mm/month). MOPs did not significantly affect the mesialization of the posterior teeth (p > 0.05). Moreover, the pain scores in the MOP-4 and MOP-7 groups were similar and showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Three MOPs with a depth of 4 mm can be performed as an effective method to increase the rate of tooth movement. However, three MOPs with depths of 4-7 mm does not additionally enhance tooth movement.

키워드

과제정보

We are grateful to Dr. Enes Ozkan for editing the manuscript.

참고문헌

  1. Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:308-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.020
  2. Uribe F, Padala S, Allareddy V, Nanda R. Patients', parents', and orthodontists' perceptions of the need for and costs of additional procedures to reduce treatment time. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145(4 Suppl):S65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.015
  3. Talic NF. Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: a clinical perspective. Saudi Dent J 2011;23:55-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.01.003
  4. Soma S, Matsumoto S, Higuchi Y, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashita K, Kurisu K, et al. Local and chronic application of PTH accelerates tooth movement in rats. J Dent Res 2000;79:1717-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790091301
  5. Nishimura M, Chiba M, Ohashi T, Sato M, Shimizu Y, Igarashi K, et al. Periodontal tissue activation by vibration: intermittent stimulation by resonance vibration accelerates experimental tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:572-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.046
  6. Yavuz MC, Sunar O, Buyuk SK, Kantarci A. Comparison of piezocision and discision methods in orthodontic treatment. Prog Orthod 2018;19:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0244-y
  7. Alikhani M, Alansari S, Sangsuwon C, Alikhani M, Chou MY, Alyami B, et al. Micro-osteoperforations: minimally invasive accelerated tooth movement. Semin Orthod 2015;21:162-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2015.06.002
  8. Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J, Chartres I, Liu Y, Thant LM, et al. Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res 2010;89:1135-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510373764
  9. Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:639-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017
  10. Nicozisis JL. Accelerated orthodontics through microosteoperforation. Orthod Pract 2013;4:56-7.
  11. Feizbakhsh M, Zandian D, Heidarpour M, Farhad SZ, Fallahi HR. The use of micro-osteoperforation concept for accelerating differential tooth movement. J World Fed Orthod 2018;7:56-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2018.04.002
  12. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010;8:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
  13. Galvao MCS, Sato JR, Coelho EC. Dahlberg formula: a novel approach for its evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2012;17:115-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512012000100015
  14. Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:771-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.026
  15. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. Boston: Pearson; 2010.
  16. Aboalnaga AA, Salah Fayed MM, El-Ashmawi NA, Soliman SA. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod 2019;20:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0
  17. Cheung T, Park J, Lee D, Kim C, Olson J, Javadi S, et al. Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:958-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.030
  18. Haliloglu-Ozkan T, Arici N, Arici S. In-vivo effects of flapless osteopuncture-facilitated tooth movement in the maxilla and the mandible. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e761-7.
  19. Azeem M, Ul Haq A, Ilyas M, Ul Hamid W, Hayat MB, Jamal F, et al. Bacteremia after micro-osteoperforation. Int Orthod 2018;16:463-9.
  20. Lee JW, Cha JY, Park KH, Kang YG, Kim SJ. Effect of flapless osteoperforation-assisted tooth movement on atrophic alveolar ridge: histomorphometric and gene-enrichment analysis. Angle Orthod 2018;88:82-90. https://doi.org/10.2319/061217-388.1
  21. Sivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT, Wey MC. Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2019;89:183-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/011518-47.1
  22. Cramer CL, Campbell PM, Opperman LA, Tadlock LP, Buschang PH. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on tooth movement and bone in the beagle maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:681-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.015
  23. Andrade I Jr, Sousa AB, da Silva GG. New therapeutic modalities to modulate orthodontic tooth movement. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:123-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.123-133.sar
  24. Shahabee M, Shafaee H, Abtahi M, Rangrazi A, Bardideh E. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement-a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2020;42:211-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz049
  25. Kundi I, Alam MK, Shaheed S. Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction. Saudi Dent J 2020;32:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.05.009
  26. Attri S, Mittal R, Batra P, Sonar S, Sharma K, Raghavan S, et al. Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations- a randomised controlled trial. J Orthod 2018;45:225-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2018.1528746
  27. Alikhani M. Clinical guide to accelerated orthodontics with a focus on micro-osteoperforations. Cham: Springer; 2017.
  28. Kolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:478-81. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.138699
  29. Muller HP, Kononen E. Variance components of gingival thickness. J Periodontal Res 2005;40:239-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00798.x
  30. Isik Aslan B, Balostuncer B, Dincer M. Are there differences on tooth movement between different sectional canine retractors? J Orofac Orthop 2013;74: 226-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-013-0142-3
  31. Kini U, Nandeesh BN. Physiology of bone formation, remodeling, and metabolism. In: Fogelman I, Gnanasegaran G, van der Wall H, eds. Radionuclide and hybrid bone imaging. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 29-57.

피인용 문헌

  1. Efficacy of micro-osteoperforation of the alveolar bone by using mini-screw for acceleration of maxillary canine retraction in young adult orthodontic patients: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial vol.19, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.09.006