DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Industrial Process Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis Based on Temporal Attention Augmented Deep Network

  • Mu, Ke (Dept. of Information and Control Engineering, Liaoning Shihua University) ;
  • Luo, Lin (Dept. of Information and Control Engineering, Liaoning Shihua University) ;
  • Wang, Qiao (Dept. of Information and Control Engineering, Liaoning Shihua University) ;
  • Mao, Fushun (Synthetic Detergent Factory of Fushun Petrochemical Company, China National Petroleum Corporation)
  • Received : 2020.11.18
  • Accepted : 2021.01.06
  • Published : 2021.04.30

Abstract

Following the intuition that the local information in time instances is hardly incorporated into the posterior sequence in long short-term memory (LSTM), this paper proposes an attention augmented mechanism for fault diagnosis of the complex chemical process data. Unlike conventional fault diagnosis and classification methods, an attention mechanism layer architecture is introduced to detect and focus on local temporal information. The augmented deep network results preserve each local instance's importance and contribution and allow the interpretable feature representation and classification simultaneously. The comprehensive comparative analyses demonstrate that the developed model has a high-quality fault classification rate of 95.49%, on average. The results are comparable to those obtained using various other techniques for the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61703191), the Foundation of Liaoning Educational Committee (No. L2017LQN028), the Scientific Research Foundation of Liaoning Shihua University (No. 2017XJJ-012).

References

  1. F. A. P. Peres and F. S. Fogliatto, "Variable selection methods in multivariate statistical process control: a systematic literature review," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 115, pp. 603-619, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.006
  2. H. Lahdhiri, M. Said, K. B. Abdellafou, O. Taouali, and M. F. Harkat, "Supervised process monitoring and fault diagnosis based on machine learning methods," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 2321-2337, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03306-z
  3. Y. Wang, Z. Pan, X. Yuan, C. Yang, and W. Gui, "A novel deep learning based fault diagnosis approach for chemical process with extended deep belief network," ISA Transactions, vol. 96, pp. 457-467, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2019.07.001
  4. S. J. Qin and L. H. Chiang, "Advances and opportunities in machine learning for process data analytics," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 126, pp. 465-473, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.04.003
  5. Q. Jiang, X. Yan, and B. Huang, "Review and perspectives of data-driven distributed monitoring for industrial plant-wide processes," Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 58, no. 29, pp. 12899-12912, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02391
  6. L. Luo, L. Xie, U. Kruger, K. Alzebdeh, and H. Su, "A novel Bayesian robust model and its application for fault detection and automatic supervision of nonlinear process," Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 54, no. 18, pp. 5048-5061, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie503633p
  7. J. C. Kabugo, S. L. Jamsa-Jounela, R. Schiemann, and C. Binder, "Industry 4.0 based process data analytics platform: a waste-to-energy plant case study," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 115, article no. 105508, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105508
  8. Q. Jiang and X. Yan, "Learning deep correlated representations for nonlinear process monitoring," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 6200-6209, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2886048
  9. Z. Zhang and J. Zhao, "A deep belief network based fault diagnosis model for complex chemical processes," Computers & Chemical Engineering, viol. 107, pp. 395-407, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.02.041
  10. L. Luo, L. Xie, and H. Su, "Deep learning with tensor factorization layers for sequential fault diagnosis and industrial process monitoring," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 105494-105506, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3000004
  11. M. Aamir, Y. F. Pu, Z. Rahman, W. A. Abro, H. Naeem, F. Ullah, and A. M. Badr, "A hybrid proposed framework for object detection and classification," Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1176-1194, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.02.0095
  12. F. Lv, C. Wen, Z. Bao, and M. Liu, "Fault diagnosis based on deep learning," in Proceedings of 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), Boston, MA, 2016, pp. 6851-6856.
  13. H. Zhao, S. Sun, and B. Jin, "Sequential fault diagnosis based on LSTM neural network," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 12929-12939, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2794765
  14. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.
  15. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, "Attention is all you need," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 5998-6008, 2017.
  16. A. Bathelt, N. L. Ricker, and M. Jelali, "Revision of the Tennessee Eastman process model," IFACPapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 309-314, 2015.
  17. X. Glorot and Y. Bengio, "Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks," in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Sardinia, Italy, 2010, pp. 249-256.
  18. S. Heo and J. H. Lee, "Fault detection and classification using artificial neural networks," IFACPapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 18, 470-475, 2018.
  19. R. Eslamloueyan, "Designing a hierarchical neural network based on fuzzy clustering for fault diagnosis of the Tennessee-Eastman process," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1407-1415, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.04.012