Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CISG as a Governing Law to an Arbitration Agreement

  • Park, Eun-Ok (Department of International Trade, Jeonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2021.10.15
  • Accepted : 2021.11.09
  • Published : 2021.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - This paper studies whether the CISG is applicable to the arbitration agreement when the validity of the arbitration agreement becomes an issue. To make the study clear, it limits the cases assuming that the governing law of the main contract is the CISG and the arbitration agreement is inserted in the main contract as a clause. Also, this paper discusses only substantive and formal validity of the arbitration agreement because the CISG does not cover the questions of the parties' capacity and arbitrability of the dispute. Design/methodology - This paper is based on scholarly writings and cases focusing on the principle of party autonomy, formation of contract and the doctrine of separability to discuss characteristic of arbitration agreement. In analyzing the cases, it concentrates on the facts and reasonings that show how the relative regulations and rules are interpreted and applied. Findings - The findings of this paper are; regarding substantive validity of arbitration agreement, the courts and arbitral tribunals consider general principles of law for the contract and the governing law for the main contract. In relation to formal validity of arbitration agreement, the law at the seat of arbitration or the law of the enforcing country are considered as the governing law in preference to the CISG because of the recognition and enforcement issues. Originality/value - This paper attempts to find the correlation between the CISG and the arbitration agreement. It studies scholars' writing and cases which have meaningful implication on this issue. By doing so, it can provide contracting parties and practitioners with some practical guidelines about the governing law for the arbitration agreement. Furthermore, it can help them to reduce unpredictability that they may confront regarding this issue in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Dmytro V. Vorobey, "CISG and Arbitration Clauses: Issues of Intent and Validity", Journal of Law & Commerce, Vo.31, 2012.
  2. Eunok Park, "A Validity of Consumer Arbitration Agreement - Focusing on U.S. Cases", The International Commerce and Law Review, Vol.77, 2018. 2.
  3. Hea-Min Lee, "10 years after the United Nations Convention on International Sales of Goods (CISG) came into effect-the trends and implications on our cases", Supreme Court Law Review, Vol.61, 2015.
  4. Hwa-kyung Mun, "The Application of the CISG as the Substantive Law in International Commercial Arbitration", International Trade Law, No.112, Ministry of Justice, 2013.08.
  5. Hwa-kyung Mun, "An Analysis of Interrelated Factors Affecting Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration", Justice, Vol.136, Korean Society of Law, 2013.
  6. Janet Walker, "Agreeing to Disagree: Can we Just Have Words? CISG Article 11 and the Model Law Writing Requirement", Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol.25, 2005.
  7. Kang-Bin Lee, "A Study on the Role of Party Autonomy in Commercial Arbitration", Journal of Arbitration Study, Vol.19, No.2, The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies, 2009.
  8. Kroll, S "Selected Problems Concerning the CISG'S Scope of Application", Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol.25, 2005/06.
  9. Kyung Han Sohn, "Arbitral Autonomy: The Concept and Scope", Sungkyunkwan Law Review, Vol.24, No.3, 2012.09.
  10. Leonardo Graffi, "The Applicable to the Validity of the Arbitration Agreement: A Practitioner's View", in [Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration], Franco Ferrari & Stefan Kroll eds., 2011.
  11. L. Mistelis, in Kroll, L.Mistelis & P.Perales Viscasillas (Eds.), UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), c.h.Beck, Munich, 2011, Art.1, para.18; Schmidt-Adrendts.
  12. Morten M. Fogt, "The Interaction and Distinction Between The Sales and Arbitration Regimes-The CISG and Agreement or Binding Practice to Arbitrate", American Review of International Arbitration, Vol.26, 2015.
  13. Na-Hee Han & Choong-Lyong Ha, "An Interpretation of the Formation of Arbitration Clause for International Sale of Goods", Journal of Arbitration Study, Vol.27, No.4, The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies, 2017.12.
  14. Nina Tepes, "The More Favorable Right Provision of Art. VII of the New York Convention and Its Application to the Form of the Arbitration Agreement", CROATIA Arbitration Year Book, Vol.12, 2005.
  15. Peter Kucherepa, "Reviewing Trends and Proposals to Recognize Oral Agreements to Arbitrate in International Arbitration Law," American Review of International Arbitration, Vol.16, 2005.
  16. Robert Koch, "The CISG as the Law Applicable to Arbitration Agreements?", in Camilla B. Andersen & Ulrich G Schroeter eds. [Sharing International Commercial Law across National Boundaries], Simmons & Hill Publishing, 2008.
  17. Seog-Ung O, "The Party's Autonomy Principle on the Choice of the Applicable law to International Commercial Arbitral Awards", Journal of Arbitration Study, Vol.17, No.1, The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies, 2007.03.
  18. Stefan Kroll, "Selected Problems concerning the CISG's Scope of Application", Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol.25, 2005. 06.
  19. Thomas E. Carbonneau, "Cases and Materials-Arbitration Law and Practice" 6th ed. American Casebook Series, West.
  20. Restatement of U.S. Law of International Commercial Arbitration, No.4 (2015), §2-7 Separability of Arbitration.
  21. Frey v. Cuccaro e Figli, (Ct. App. Napoli 1976) in The Year Book of Commercial Arbitration, Vol.1
  22. Volt Information Science, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University, 489 U.S. 468, 109 S. Ct. 1248 (1989)
  23. Filanto, S.p.A. v Chilewich Int'l Corp., 789 F. Supp. 1229, 1241 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).
  24. Lucky-Goldstar Int'l (H.K.) Ltd. V. Ng Moo Kee Eng'g Ltd., 2H.K.L.R. 73 (H.C. 1993).
  25. Enka Insaat ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb [2020] UKSC 38.
  26. Golden Valley Grape Juice & Wine, LLC v. Centrisys Corp., 2010 WL 347897.
  27. XL Insurance Ltd v. Owens Corning, (2000) 2 Lloyd's Rep.500 (Q.B.) (U.K.).
  28. H. Small Limited v. Goldroyce Garment Ltd. [1994], 2 H.K.L.R. p.526 (H.C.).
  29. Pace-CISG Database [www.cisg.laq.pace.edu].
  30. CLOUT [www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/case_law.html].