DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Extraoral versus endoscopic-assisted transoral treatment modalities for mandibular condylar fractures: a current opinion

  • Anand, Manish (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital) ;
  • Panwar, Shreya (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University)
  • Received : 2021.04.30
  • Accepted : 2021.08.30
  • Published : 2021.11.15

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Shiju M, Rastogi S, Gupta P, et al. Fractures of the mandibular condyle: open versus closed: a treatment dilemma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:448-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.01.012
  2. Al-Moraissi EA, Louvrier A, Colletti G, et al. Does the surgical approach for treating mandibular condylar fractures affect the rate of seventh cranial nerve injuries? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a new classification for surgical approaches. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:398-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.10.024
  3. Haug RH, Brandt MT. Traditional versus endoscope-assisted open reduction with rigid internal fixation (ORIF) of adult mandibular condyle fractures: a review of the literature regarding current thoughts on management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1272-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.017
  4. Schubert W, Jenabzadeh K. Endoscopic approach to maxillofacial trauma. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:154-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318191cfb8
  5. Handschel J, Ruggeberg T, Depprich R, et al. Comparison of various approaches for the treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:e397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.02.012
  6. Schneider M, Lauer G, Eckelt U. Surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle: a comparison of long-term results following different approaches: functional, axiographical, and radiological findings. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:151-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.01.003
  7. Rozeboom A, Dubois L, Bos R, et al. Open treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46:1257-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.06.018
  8. Shakya S, Zhang X, Liu L. Key points in surgical management of mandibular condylar fractures. Chin J Traumatol 2020;23:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.08.006
  9. Han C, Dilxat D, Zhang X, et al. Does intraoperative navigation improve the anatomical reduction of intracapsular condylar fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:2583-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.07.030
  10. Zeng W, Lian X, Chen G, et al. Digital diagnosis and treatment program for maxillofacial fractures: a retrospective analysis of 626 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:1470-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.040
  11. de Souza GM, Rodrigues DC, Celegatti Filho TS, et al. In-vitro comparison of mechanical resistance between two straight plates and a Y-plate for fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:168-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.005
  12. Ganguly A, Mittal G, Garg R. Comparison between 3D delta plate and conventional miniplate in treatment of condylar fracture: a randomised clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2021 Feb 6 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.026.
  13. Sukegawa S, Kanno T, Masui M, et al. Which fixation methods are better between three-dimensional anatomical plate and two miniplates for the mandibular subcondylar fracture open treatment? J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:771-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.033
  14. Kanno T, Okuma S, Karino M, et al. Unexpected plate fracture in a three-dimensional subcondylar locking plate system. J Hard Tissue Biol 2016;25:442-6. https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.25.442
  15. Bischoff EL, Carmichael R, Reddy LV. Plating options for fixation of condylar neck and base fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2017;25:69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2016.11.003