Wind and Structures

  • 제32권4호
  • /
  • Pages.283-292
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-6116(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6225(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance-based wind design framework proposal for tall buildings

  • Alinejad, Hamidreza (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering & Engineering Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Thomas H.K. (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering & Engineering Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seung Yong (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering & Engineering Research Institute, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.17
  • 심사 : 2021.03.08
  • 발행 : 2021.04.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Performance-based seismic design (PBSD) is currently used for retrofitting of older buildings and the design of new buildings. Whereas, application of performance-based design for wind load is still under development. The tendency has been in the codes to increase wind hazard based on recent recorded events. Since tall buildings are highly susceptible to wind load, necessity for developing a framework for performance-based wind design (PBWD) has intensified. Only a few guidelines such as ASCE (2019) provide information on using PBWD as an alternative for code prescriptive wind design. Though wind hazards, performance objectives, analysis techniques, and acceptance criteria are explained, no recommendations are provided for several aspects like how to select a proper level of wind hazard for each target performance criterion. This paper is an attempt to explain current design philosophy for wind and seismic loads and inherent connection between the components of PBSD for development of a framework for PBWD of tall buildings. Recognizing this connection, a framework for PBWD based on limits set for serviceability and strength is also proposed. Also, the potential for carrying out PBWD in line with ASCE 7-16 is investigated and proposed in this paper.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdullah, S.A., Aswegan, K., Jaberansari, S., Klemencic, R. and Wallace, J.W. (2020), "Performance of reinforced concrete coupling beams subjected to simulated wind loading", ACI Struct. J., 117(3), 283-295.
  2. AIJ (2004a), Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (AIJ 2004), Architectural Institute of Japan.
  3. AIJ (2004b), Guidelines for the Evaluation of Habitability to Building Vibration, Architectural Institute of Japan.
  4. Alinejad H., Jeong, S.Y. and Kang, T. H.-K. (2020a), "Performance-based design of tall buildings for wind load and application of response modification factor", Wind Struct., 31(2), 153-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.31.2.153.
  5. Alinejad H., Jeong, S.Y. and Kang, T. H.-K. (2020b), "Comparative assessment of ASCE 7-16 and KBC 2016 for determination of design wind loads for tall buildings", Wind Struct., 31(6), 575-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.31.6.575.
  6. Alinejad, H. and Kang, T. H.-K. (2020), "Engineering review of ASCE 7-16 wind-load provisions and wind effect on tall concrete-frame buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 146(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002622.
  7. ASCE (2017), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-16), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  8. ASCE (2017), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE 41-17), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  9. ASCE (2019), Prestandard for Performance-Based Wind Design, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  10. Aswegan, K., Larsen, R., Klemencic, R., Hooper, J. and Hasselbauer, J. (2017), "Performance-based wind and seismic engineering: Benefits of considering multiple hazards," In Buildings and Special Structures, Proceedings of the Structures Congress.
  11. Boggs, D. and Dragovich, J. (2006), "The nature of wind loads and dynamic response", Special Publication, ACI SP-240, 15-44.
  12. Bracci, J.M. (2006), "Performance-based design of RC buildings for wind loads-Overview and issues", Special Publication, ACI SP-240, 1-14.
  13. El Damatty, A.A. and Elezaby, F.Y. (2018), "The integration of wind and structural engineering", In The 2018 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, & Materials Research (ACEM18), Songdo, Korea.
  14. ISO (2007), Bases for Design of Structures - Serviceability of Buildings and Walkways Against Vibrations (ISO 10137), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  15. Kang, T. H.-K., Jeong, S. Y. and Alinejad, H. (2019), "Understanding of wind load determination according to KBC 2016 and its application to high-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Institute of Korea, 23(2), 83-89.
  16. Kwok, K.C., Burton, M.D. and Abdelrazaq, A.K. (2015), Wind-Induced Motion of Tall Buildings: Designing for Habitability, American Society of Civil Engineers.
  17. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (Korea) (2016), Korean Building Code (KBC 2016).
  18. Peterka, J.A. and Shahid, S. (1988), "Design gust wind speeds in the United States", J. Struct. Eng., 124(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:2(207).
  19. Pozzuoli, C., Bartoli, G., Peil, U. and Clobes, M. (2013), "Serviceability wind risk assessment of tall buildings including aeroelastic effects", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 123(B), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.014
  20. Smith, B.S. and Coull, A. (1991), Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design, John Wiley and Sons.
  21. Tall Buildings Initiative (TBI) (2017), Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings (TBI 2017), developed by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center as part of the Tall Building Initiative.
  22. Tamura, Y., Kawai, H., Uematsu, Y., Okada, H. and Ohkuma, T. (2004), "Documents for wind resistant design of buildings in Japan," In Workshop on Regional Harmonization of Wind Loading and Wind Environmental Specifications in Asia-Pacific Economies (APEC-WW).