DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Design Factors in a Pump Station on Pressure Variations by Water Hammering

가압 펌프장에서 설계인자들이 수격에 의한 압력변동에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Jong-Hoon (Graduate School of Convergence Science, SeoulTech) ;
  • Sung, Jaeyong (Department of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, SeoulTech)
  • 박종훈 (서울과학기술대 융합과학대학원) ;
  • 성재용 (서울과학기술대학교 기계자동차공학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.16
  • Accepted : 2021.10.01
  • Published : 2021.12.01

Abstract

In this study, the effect of design factors in a pump station on the pressure variations which are the main cause of water hammering has been investigated by numerical simulations. As design factors, the flow rate, Young's modulus, diameter, thickness, roughness coefficient of pipeline are considered. The relationships between the pressure variations and the design factors are analyzed. The results show that the pressure variation increases sensitively with the flow rate and Young's modulus, and increases gradually with the thickness and roughness coefficient of pipe, whereas it decreases with the pipe diameter. The wavelength of the pressure wave becomes longer for a smaller Young's modulus, a smaller pipe thickness and a bigger pipe diameter. These relationships are nondimensionalized, and logarithmic curve-fitted functions are proposed by regression analysis. Most effective factors on the nondimensional pressure variation is Young's modulus. Flow rate, roughness coefficient, relative thickness and pipe diameters are the next impact factors.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Y. H., 2021, Piping Engineering, Books Hill.
  2. Watters, G. Z., 1984, Analysis and Control of Unsteady Flow in Pipelines, 2nd Ed., Butterworth.
  3. Watters, G. Z., 1979, Modern Analysis and Control of Unsteady Flow in Pipelines, Ann Arbor Science Publisher.
  4. Streeter, V. L., and Wylie, E. B., 1967, Hydraulic transients caused by reciprocating pumps, J. Eng. Power, Vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3616754
  5. Wylie, E. B., Streeter, V. L., and Suo, L., 1993, Fluid Transients in System, Prentice Hall.
  6. Lingrieddy S. and Wood, D. J., 2021, Surge Analysis and Wave Plan Method, KYPipe LLC.
  7. Lee, J. H., Chung, K. S., Kim, Y. I., and Sa, K. Y., 2010, A study on the effect of water hammering on pipe supports, Proceedings of the SAREK Conference, pp. 239-244.
  8. Kim, S. Y., Joo, S. S., Lee, S. H., and Yoon, K. S., 2016, Assessment of hammer of penstock by emergency shutdown, Proceedings of the KSCE Conference, pp. 200-201.
  9. Kim, S. G., and Lee, K. B., 2007, Water hammer in the pump pipelines system with an airchamber, J. Energy Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 187-193.
  10. Yang, C. S., 2015, A Study About Facility Damage Protection System Against Water Hammer, Ph. D. Thesis, Incheon University.
  11. Park, J. H., 2010, A Study of Waterhammer Analysis on Pump System, Master's Thesis, Hanyang University.
  12. Korea Water Resources Corporation, 2005, Buan Dam System Water Hammer Analysis and Empirical Experiment, Report for Research Service.
  13. Park, H. Y., Park, J. H., and No, S. M., 2010, Pipe Network Analysis Design using Pipe 2010, Hongneung Science Publishing Company.
  14. Park, H. Y., and Lee, H. D., 2021, Pipe Network Irregular Flow Analysis Theory and Practice, Gong-Gam Books.
  15. Lee, M. H., 1998, An Analysis of Water Hammer in Pipeline Systems with Pump, Journal of the Korean Society Marine Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 92-99.
  16. Ra, B. P., and Park, J. H., 2008, Application & Examination of the plan for optimum stability through Water-hammer in water pipe line and booster pump station, Proceedings of the KFMA Conference, pp. 197-203.
  17. Yang, C. S., and Lee, S. K., 2011, Water-hammer in the Pump Pipeline System with and without an Air-Chamber, Journal of the KOSOS, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1-7.