Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of local hyaluronidase administration in guided bone regeneration surgery: a randomized controlled trial

  • Kwoen, Min-Jeong (Department of Oral and Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Keun-Suh (Department of Oral and Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Na-Hee (Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Jung (Department of Oral and Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.11.06
  • Accepted : 2021.01.11
  • Published : 2021.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Hyaluronoglucosaminidase (hyaluronidase) increases the local intercellular permeability of the peripheral lymphatic channel and capillaries, which may help reduce edema. In the present study, the effects of hyaluronidase on postoperative edema and pain reduction were evaluated. Materials and Methods: The study included 38 patients who underwent guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery before implantation. Patients were randomly assigned to either the control group (n=20) or the test group (n=18). Hyaluronidase was injected into the GBR site of subjects in the test group. Postoperative edema was evaluated by measuring the distance between specific facial landmarks immediately after surgery (T1) and 2-4 days after surgery (T2). The degree of pain at T2 and at 10-14 days after surgery (T3) was assessed. Results: In the test group, the degree of swelling was lower than in the control group, however, only two measurements, from the tragus to the mouth corner and from the outer canthus to the mouth corner, showed statistically significant differences (P=0.012 and P=0.001, respectively). The anti-edema effect of hyaluronidase was more effective in the maxilla than in the mandible. In the maxilla, the percentage of facial swelling was significant for three measurements. However, in the mandible, the percentage of facial swelling was significant for only one measurement. Low levels of pain that were similar at T2 and T3 were reported in both groups. Conclusion: The results indicate the degree of swelling was lower in the test group and hyaluronidase appeared to be more effective in the maxilla. The degree of pain reduction was similar between groups. Further in vivo and randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Keywords

References

  1. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:809-18. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x
  2. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
  3. Reich KM, Huber CD, Lippnig WR, Ulm C, Watzek G, Tangl S. Atrophy of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth loss in an historical population. Oral Dis 2011;17:33-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01699.x
  4. Lim G, Lin GH, Monje A, Chan HL, Wang HL. Wound healing complications following guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:41-50. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5581
  5. Romanos GE. Periosteal releasing incision for successful coverage of augmented sites. A technical note. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00068
  6. Moslemi N, Khorsand A, Torabi S, Shahnaz A, Soleimani Shayesteh Y, Fekrazad R. Periosteal releasing incision with diode laser in guided bone regeneration procedure: a case series. J Lasers Med Sci 2016;7:259-64. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2016.46
  7. Stern S, Lindenhayn K, Schultz O, Perka C. Cultivation of porcine cells from the nucleus pulposus in a fibrin/hyaluronic acid matrix. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:496-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317381207
  8. Khan N, Niazi ZR, Rehman FU, Akhtar A, Khan MM, Khan S, et al. Hyaluronidases: a therapeutic enzyme. Protein Pept Lett 2018;25:663-76. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929866525666180629121823
  9. Nekoroski T, Paladini RD, Sauder DN, Frost GI, Keller GA. A recombinant human hyaluronidase sustained release gel for the treatment of post-surgical edema. Int J Dermatol 2014;53:777-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.12304
  10. Buhren BA, Schrumpf H, Hoff NP, Bolke E, Hilton S, Gerber PA. Hyaluronidase: from clinical applications to molecular and cellular mechanisms. Eur J Med Res 2016;21:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0201-5
  11. Cerqueira PR, Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV. Comparative study of the effect of a tube drain in impacted lower third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:57-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00675-x
  12. Duran-Reynals F. Studies on a certain spreading factor existing in bacteria and its significance for bacterial invasiveness. J Exp Med 1933;58:161-81. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.58.2.161
  13. Hobby GL, Dawson MH, Meyer K, Chaffee E. The relationship between spreading factor and hyaluronidase. J Exp Med 1941;73:109-23. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.73.1.109
  14. Fronza M, Muhr C, da Silveira DS, Sorgi CA, Rodrigues SF, Farsky SH, et al. Hyaluronidase decreases neutrophils infiltration to the inflammatory site. Inflamm Res 2016;65:533-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-016-0935-0
  15. Frost GI. Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20): an enabling platform for subcutaneous drug and fluid administration. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2007;4:427-40. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.4.4.427
  16. van Wijk A, Kieffer JM, Lindeboom JH. Effect of third molar surgery on oral health-related quality of life in the first postoperative week using Dutch version of Oral Health Impact Profile-14. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1026-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.041
  17. Han JH, Kim J, Yoon KC, Shin HW. Treatment of post-traumatic hematoma and fibrosis using hyaluronidase injection. Arch Craniofac Surg 2018;19:218-21. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2017.01396
  18. Kim JH, Yang H, Oh SH, Song SH, Kyung H. The efficacy of hyaluronidase in early surgery of nasal bone fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:e617-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005646
  19. Koc O, Er N. Can hyaluronidase be an alternative postoperative anti-edema agent to dexamethasone? Preliminary results of an animal study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:1653-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.03.010
  20. Amin MM, Laskin DM. Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55:448-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90227-x
  21. Chukwuneke FN, Oji C, Saheeb DB. A comparative study of the effect of using a rubber drain on postoperative discomfort following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:341-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.016
  22. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011;152:2399-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005