Economic and Environmental Geology (자원환경지질)

The Korean Society of Economic and Environmental Geology (대한자원환경지질학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Groundwater Recharge Evaluation on Yangok-ri Area of Hongseong Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model (VELAS)

분포형 수문모형(VELAS)을 이용한 홍성 양곡리 일대 지하수 함양량 평가

  • Ha, Kyoochul (Geologic Environment Division, Korea institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Park, Changhui (GeoGreen21 Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Sunghyun (GeoGreen21 Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Shin, Esther (GeoGreen21 Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Eunhee (Geologic Environment Division, Korea institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM))
  • Received : 2021.02.03
  • Accepted : 2021.02.21
  • Published : 2021.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, one of the distributed hydrologic models, VELAS, was used to analyze the variation of hydrologic elements based on water balance analysis to evaluate the groundwater recharge in more detail than the annual time scale for the past and future. The study area is located in Yanggok-ri, Seobu-myeon, Hongseong-gun, Chungnam-do, which is very vulnerable to drought. To implement the VELAS model, spatial characteristic data such as digital elevation model (DEM), vegetation, and slope were established, and GIS data were constructed through spatial interpolation on the daily air temperature, precipitation, average wind speed, and relative humidity of the Korea Meteorological Stations. The results of the analysis showed that annual precipitation was 799.1-1750.8 mm, average 1210.7 mm, groundwater recharge of 28.8-492.9 mm, and average 196.9 mm over the past 18 years from 2001 to 2018 in the study area. Annual groundwater recharge rate compared to annual precipitation was from 3.6 to 28.2% with a very large variation and average 14.9%. By the climate change RCP 8.5 scenario, the annual precipitation from 2019 to 2100 was 572.8-1996.5 mm (average 1078.4 mm) and groundwater recharge of 26.7-432.5 mm (average precipitation 16.2%). The annual groundwater recharge rates in the future were projected from 2.8% to 45.1%, 18.2% on average. The components that make up the water balance were well correlated with precipitation, especially in the annual data rather than the daily data. However, the amount of evapotranspiration seems to be more affected by other climatic factors such as temperature. Groundwater recharge in more detailed time scale rather than annual scale is expected to provide basic data that can be used for groundwater development and management if precipitation are severely varied by time, such as droughts or floods.

본 연구는 과거와 미래의 연 단위보다 상세한 일단위 지하수 함양량을 평가하기 위해, 분포형 수문모형중의 하나인 VELAS를 이용하여 물수지에 근거한 수문요소별 변동을 분석하고자 하였다. 가뭄에 매우 취약한 충남 홍성군 서부면 양곡리 일대 소유역을 대상으로, VELAS의 입력자료인 수치표고모델, 식생도, 경사도 등의 공간특성자료를 구축하였고, 기후자료는 기상청의 일별 대기온도, 강수, 평균풍속, 상대습도 등의 자료를 공간적으로 보간하였다. 연구지역의 과거 2001년부터 2018년까지 18년 동안 일단위 물수지 분석결과, 연간 강수량은 799.1~1750.8 mm로 평균 1210.7 mm이고, 지하수 함양량은 28.8~492.9 mm로 평균 196.9 mm로 분석되었다. 연 강수량 대비 지하수 함양률은 최소 3.6%에서 최대 28.2%로 변동폭이 매우 크고, 평균 함양률은 14.9%였다. 미래 기후변화 RCP 8.5시나리오에 의한 2019년부터 2100년까지의 일단위 물수지 분석결과, 연간 강수량은 572.8~1996.5 mm(평균 1078.4 mm)이고, 지하수함양량은 26.7~432.5 mm, 평균 174.6 mm(평균 강수량의 16.2%)로서 과거보다 다소 증가하였다. 미래 연간 지하수 함양률은 최소 2.8%, 최대 45.1%, 평균 18.2%로 분석되었다. 물수지를 구성하는 요소들은 강수량과의 상관성이 잘 나타나며, 일단위보다는 연단위로 갈수록 그러한 상관성이 뚜렷했다. 다만, 증발산량은 강수량보다는 기온 등 다른 기후요소에 더 영향을 받는 것으로 보인다. 본 연구를 통해 산정된 연단위 보다 상세 시간 단위에서의 지하수함양량은 가뭄 또는 홍수 등 시기별로 강수량 변동이 심한 경우 지하수개발과 관리에 활용될 수 있는 기초자료를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbot, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, P.E., Connell, O. and Rasmussen, J. (1986) An introduction to the European hydrological system-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, SHE, 1: Histroy and Philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. Journal of Hydrology, v.87, p.45-59. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(86)90114-9
  2. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, Rome.
  3. Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah,R.S. and Allen, P.M. (1999) Continentalscale simulation of the hydrologic balance. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, JAWRA v.35(5), p.1037-1051. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04192.x
  4. Bae, S.-K. and Kim, Y.-H. (2006) Estimation of groundwater recharge rate using the NRCS-CN and baseflow separation methods. Journal of Environmental Science International, v.15(3), p.253-260. doi: 10.5322/JES.2006.15.3.253
  5. Batelaan, O. and de Smedt (2001) WetSpass: a flexible, GIS based, distributed recharge methodology for regional groundwater modelling, Impact of Human Activity on Groundwater Dynamics (Proceedings of a symposium held during the Sixth IAHS Scientific Assembly at Maastricht, The Netherlands, July 2001). IAHS Publ. no. 269, p.11-17.
  6. Choi, B.-S. and Ahn, J.-G. (1998) A study on the estimation of regional groundwater recharge ratio. Journal of the Korean Society of Groundwater Environment, v.5(2), p.57-65.
  7. DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute) (1999) MIKE SHE Water Movement: User manual, Denmark: Horsholm, Danish Hydraulic Institute.
  8. Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C. and McDonald, M.G. (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process. Open-File Report 00-92, US Geological Survey. doi: 10.3133/ofr200092
  9. Healy, R.W. and Cook, P.G. (2002) Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeology Journal, v.10, p.91-109. doi: 10.1007/s10040-001-0178-0
  10. Jang, C.H., Kim, H.J., Kim, Y.M. and Nam, M.A. (2013) Assessing the effect of water and heat cycle of green roof system using distributed hydrological model in urban area. Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment, v.13(4), p.33-41. doi: 10.12813/kieae.2013.13.4.033
  11. Jarvis, A., Reuter, H.I., Nelson, A. and Guevara, E. (2008) Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org (accessed 19.01.09).
  12. KICT(Korea Institute of Construction and Transportation) (2007) Development of analyzing system for surface water hydrological components, 21st Century Frontier R&D program -Sustainable Water Resources Research Program, 384p.
  13. KIGAM(Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) (2012) Development of integrated core technologies in aquifer recharge system for groundwater sustainability, GP2012-013-2012(1), 267p.
  14. KIGAM(Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources), KRC(Korea Rural Community Corporation), and GeoGreen21 (2018) Annual performance and plan for Well network system technology development against Drought, Environmental Technology Development Project, 170p.
  15. Kim, C.G, Kim, H., Jang, C.H. and Im, S.J. (2007) Groundwater recharge estimation of the Gyeongan-cheon watershed with MIKE SHE modeling system, J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc., v.40(6), p.459-468. doi: 10.3741/JKWRA.2007.40.6.459
  16. Kim, G.-B., Yi, M.-J., Kim, J.-W., Lee, J.-Y. and Lee, K.-K. (2004) Evaluation of estimating groundwater recharge using waterlevel data obtained from the national groundwater monitoring stations. The Journal of Engineering Geology, v.14(3), p.313-323.
  17. Kim, M., Jeong, G., Lee, J.E. and Kim, M. (2020) Estimating exploitable groundwater as a function of precipitation using a distributed hydrologic model and frequency analysis. The Journal of Engineering Geology, v.30(3), p.253-268. doi: 10.9720/kseg.2020.3.253
  18. Kim, N.W., Lee, J., Chung, I.M. and Kim, D.P. (2008) Hydrologic component analysis of the Seolma-Cheon watershed by using SWAT-K model, Journal of Environmental Science International, v.17(12), p.1363-1372. doi: 10.5322/JES.2008.17.12.1363
  19. Kim, N.W., Shin, A.H. and Kim, C.G. (2009) Comparison of SWAT-K and HSPF for Hydrological Components Modeling in the Chungju Dam Watershed, Journal of Environmental Science International, v.18(6), p.609-619. doi: 10.5322/JES.2009.18.6.609
  20. Kim, S.W., Park, S.-I., Ko, K., Lee, H.-J., Kihm, Y.H. and Lee, S.R. (2014) 1:100,000 Tectonostratigraphic map of the Hongseong area, map 1: solid geology interpretation; Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources.
  21. KMA(Korea Meteorological Agency) (2018) Analysis of Climate Change Forecasts on the Korean Peninsula, 172p.
  22. Koo, M.-H. and Lee, D.-H. (2002) A numerical analysis of the water level fluctuation method for quantifying groundwater recharge. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, v.38(3), p.407-420.
  23. KSIS(Korea Soil Information System) (2019), Soil Series, http://soil.rda.go.kr, (accessed 19.01.09).
  24. Lee, C.H. and Kim, S.S. (1963) Explanatory text of the geological map of Hong song sheet (1:50,000). Geological survey of Korea, Korea, 33p
  25. Lee, J.H., Jun, S.W., Lee, M.J. and Hong, H.J. (2010) Coupled Model Development between Groundwater Recharge Quantity and Climate Change in River Watershed II, Green Growth Research 2010-18, Korea Environment Institute, 149p.
  26. MCT(Ministry of Construction and Transportation), K-water, KIGAM(Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) (2005) Report for basic groundwater survey of Hongseon area, 253p.
  27. ME(Ministry of Environment) and K-water (2019) 2019 Groundwater Annual Report, 372p.
  28. MLT(Ministry of Land and Transport) (2017) National Groundwater Basic Plan (supplemented), 168p.
  29. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R. and King, K.W. (2002) Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical documentation, Version 2000, TWRI Report TR-191. College Station, TX.: Texas Water Resources Institute.
  30. Park, C.K. (1996) Estimation of the available amount of groundwater in south Korea: 2. Application of five major river basins. J. Soil Groundw. Environ. v.3(1), p.21-26.
  31. Park, C., Lee, J. and Koo, M.-H. (2013) Development of a fully-distributed daily hydrologic feedback model addressing vegetation, land cover, and soil water dynamics (VELAS). Journal of Hydrology, v.493, p.43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.027
  32. Park, E. (2012) Delineation of recharge rate from a hybrid water table fluctuation method. Water Resources Research, v.48, W07503, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011696.
  33. Park J.-H. and Kang, B.-S. (2006) Comparison of runoff analysis between GIS-based distributed model and lumped model for flood forecast of dam watershed, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, v.9(3), p.171-182.
  34. Park, J.-S., Kim, K.-H., Jeon, M.-W. and Kim, J.-S. (1999) Estimation methods of groundwater recharge rate in small basin. Journal of the Korean Society of Groundwater Environment, v.6(2), p.76-86.
  35. Shin, E., Koh, E.-H., Ha, K., Lee, E. and Lee, K.-K. (2016) Impact of climate change on the groundwater recharge and groundwater level variations in Pyoseon watershed of Jeju island, Korea, Journal of the Korean Society of Groundwater Environment, v.21(6), p.22-35.
  36. Vieux, B.E. (2004) Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS, second ed. Water Science Technology Series, v. 48. ISBN:1-4020-2459-2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 289p.
  37. Yoon, H., Yoon, P., Lee, E., Kim, G.B. and Moon, S.H. (2016) Application of machine learning technique-based time series models for prediction of groundwater level fluctuation to national groundwater monitoring network data. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, v.52, p.187-199. https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2016.52.3.187