DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Taxpayer Behavior in Using E-Vehicle in Indonesia

  • Evi Zubaidah (Department of Political Science Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta) ;
  • Achmad Nurmandi (Department of Political Science Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta) ;
  • Ulung Pribadi (Department of Political Science Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta) ;
  • Mega Hidyati (Department of Political Science Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta)
  • Received : 2021.02.22
  • Accepted : 2021.08.09
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

The low use of e-vehicles in Yogyakarta City and Pekanbaru City is an essential issue for local governments to maximize e-government policies in both regions. The purpose of this research is to analyze people's attitudes and factors influencing the community of e-Samsat (e-Vehicle tax) users in developing the UMEGA theory, namely technology and government trust. This is a quantitative research based on the philosophy of positivism, which is used to examine populations and individual samples. Data were collected using research instruments and quantitatively analyzed. Furthermore, the hypothesis of the obtained data was tested using SEM-PLS. The results showed that social influence does not affect attitudes of e-Samsat (e-Vehicle tax) users. Furthermore, the study showed that the development of umega theory by adding variables of trust in technology and government affects people's behavior in using e-Samsat services.

Keywords

References

  1. Abu-shanab, E. (2014). Antecedents of trust in e-government services: An empirical test in Jordan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4), 480-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2013-0027 
  2. Al-hujran, O., Al-debei, M. M., Chatfield, A., and Migdadi, M. (2015). Computers in human behavior the imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers In Human Behavior, 53, 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025 
  3. Anggraeny, C. D., Pribadi, U., and Iqbal, M. (2020). Faktor yang mempengaruhi masyarakat menggunakan aplikasi lapor polisi kita di kabupaten sleman. ARISTO, 9(1), 30-50. 
  4. Anggraini, A. T., and Iqbal, M. (2020). The uttilization of Jogja smart service application: An E-readiness approach. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 7(2), 150-159. 
  5. Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S. B., and Oh, W. (2011). An odyssey into virtual worlds: exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 789-810. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042809 
  6. Bahtiar, R. (2018). Implementasi sistem pembayaran pajak kendaraan bermotor berbasis elektronik (E-Samsat) di Jawa Barat. Diploma thesis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. 
  7. Daniel, M. (2015). Electronic government: Understanding factors affecting citizen adoption in Papua New Guinea using the UTAUT. Contemporary PNG Studies 23, 1-12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2015.1007683
  8. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., and Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001 
  9. Fahrianta, R. Y., Chandrararin, G., and Subiyantoro, E. (2018). The conceptual model of integration of acceptance and use of technology with the information systems success. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 407(1), 012144. 
  10. Gautam, V., and Sharma, V. (2020). Online young consumer shopping self-efficacy: An indian exploration. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 532-546.  https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2020.30.3.532
  11. Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., and Gupta, A. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.004 
  12. Hung, H. T., Chiu, Y. C. J., and Yeh, H. C. (2013). Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory -driven design rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.x 
  13. Iqbal, M. (2021). Smart city in practice: Learn from Taipei city. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 8(1), 50-59.  https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.811342
  14. Iqbal, M., Pribadi, U., and Elianda, Y. (2020). Factors affecting the citizen to use e-report application in Gunungkidul Regency. Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, 4(2), 27-39. 
  15. Kallaya, K., Prasong, P., and Kittima, M. (2009). An acceptance of mobile learning for higher education students in thailand. Faculty of Informatics, Doctor of Philosophy Program in Information Technology Sripatum University, Bangkok 10900, 17-18. 
  16. Lim, C. J. F., Koh, B., and Lee, D. (2020). Adoption of mobile Peer-to-Peer payment: Enabling role of substitution and social aspects. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 571-590. 
  17. Mapanoo, M. E. D., and Caballero, J. M. (2018). E-Government for human capability development program: An implementation of G2E System for enhanced government services. MATEC Web of Conferences, 189, 10005. 
  18. Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006 
  19. Pavlou, P. A., and Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148720 
  20. Pribadi, U., Iqbal, M., and Saputra, H. A. (2021, March). Implementation of online single submission software application in Yogyakarta city: Identifying prominent factors of organizational aspects. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 717, No. 1, p. 012025). IOP Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/717/1/012025
  21. Rahman, Amni Zarkasyi and Usmani, L. F. (2020). Kualitas pelayanan aplikasi SAKPOLE dalam upaya pembangunan daerah provinsi jawa tengah. In Slamet Riyadi Conference on Public Administration (SRIPA), 16 April 2020, Surakarta. 
  22. Rana, N. P., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Citizen's adoption of an e-government system : Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.02.002 
  23. Sa'idah, N. (2017). Analisis penggunaan sistem pendaftaran online (E-health) berdasarkan unified theory of accepptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Journal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia, 5(1), 72-81.  https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v5i1.2017.72-81
  24. Sabbir, M., Akter, S., Tabish, T., and Das, A. (2020). Exploring Factors Affecting Consumers' Intention to Use Smartwatch in Bangladesh: An Empirical Study. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 636-663.  https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2020.30.3.636
  25. Simanjuntak, S. E., Timbul, H., and Imam Mukhlis, S. E. (2012). (2012). Dimensi Ekonomi Perpajakan Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi.pdf. 
  26. Sjafrizal, T., and Jacob, D. W. (2017). The critical factors affecting e-Government adoption in Indonesia: A conceptual framework. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(1), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.1.1614 
  27. Slade, E., Williams, M., Dwivedi, Y., and Piercy, N. (2015). Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(3), 209-223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2014.914075
  28. Taiwo, A. A., and Downe, A. G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology 49(1), 48-58. 
  29. Ulfa, E. F. (2016). Inovasi layanan samsat walk thru sebagai wujud pelayanan prima di kantor bersama samsat mojokerto. Publika, 4(8). 
  30. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.  https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  31. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
  32. Verkijika, S. F., and De Wet, L. (2018). E-government adoption in sub-Saharan Africa. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.05.012 
  33. Wang, C. (2014). Computers in human behavior antecedents and consequences of perceived value in mobile government continuance use: An empirical research in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.034 
  34. Zawaideh, F. (2016). Acceptance of e-government services among Jordanian citizen. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 4(2), 2348-2351 
  35. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Iinformation Quarterly, 32(4), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.005