Animal Bioscience

  • 제34권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1022-1028
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nitrate supplementation of rations based on rice straw but not Pangola hay, improves growth performance in meat goats

  • Paengkoum, Siwaporn (Faculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University) ;
  • Khotsakdee, Jiravan (Faculty of Sciences and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan) ;
  • Paengkoum, Pramote (School of Animal Technology and Innovation, Suranaree University of Technology) ;
  • Schonewille, Thomas (Faculty of Sciences and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan) ;
  • Yuangklang, Chalermpon (Faculty of Sciences and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.23
  • 심사 : 2020.07.28
  • 발행 : 2021.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: Supplemental nitrate is known to be an effective tool to mitigate methane emission by ruminants. Based on theoretical considerations, supplemental nitrate can improve but also deteriorate the growth performance. The overall effect of supplemental nitrate on growth performance, however, is not yet known. The objective of the current study was therefore to evaluate the effect of a higher dose of NO3- on overall growth performance when feeding either Pangola grass hay or rice straw. Methods: Thirty-two crossbred, 3-month-old Thai native×Anglo-Nubian crossbred male goats were used. The experiment had a 2×2 factorial design with an experimental period of 60 days. Eight goats were randomly allocated to each dietary treatment, i.e. a ration containing either Pangola hay (Digitaria eriantha Steud) or rice straw (Oryza Sativa) as a source of roughage, supplemented with a concentrate containing either 3.2% or 4.8% potassium nitrate. The rations were formulated to be isonitrogenous. The animals were weighed at the start of the experiment and at days 30 and 60. Feces were collected during the last five days of each 30-day period. Results: High-nitrate increased overall DM intake by approximately 3%, irrespective the source of roughage, but only the goats fed a rice straw-based ration responded with an increase in body weight (BW). Thus, the overall feed conversion ratio (kg feed/kg BW gain) was influenced by roughage source ×nitrate and decreased by almost 60% when the goats were fed rice straw in combination with a high versus a low dietary nitrate content. The digestibility of macronutrients was only affected by the source of roughage and the digestibility of organic matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fibre was greater when the goats were fed Pangola hay. Conclusion: It was concluded that the replacement of soybean meal by nitrate improves the growth performance of meat goats fed rations based on rice straw, but not Pangola hay.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Patra AK. Recent advances in measurement and dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions in ruminants. Front Vet Sci 2016;3:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00039
  2. Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootech 2000;49:231-53. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000119
  3. Guyader J, Eugene M, Meunier B, et al. Additive methane-mitigating effect between linseed oil and nitrate fed to cattle. J Anim Sci 2015;93:3564-77. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8196
  4. Nolan JV, Hegarty RS, Hegarty J, Godwin IR, Woodgate R. Effects of dietary nitrate on fermentation, methane production and digesta kinetics in sheep. Anim Prod Sci 2010;50:801-6. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09211
  5. van Zijderveld SM, Gerrits WJJ, Dijkstra J, Newbold JR, Hulshof RBA, Perdok HB. Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:4028-38. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4236
  6. Li L, Davis J, Nolan J, Hegarty R. An initial investigation on rumen fermentation pattern and methane emission of sheep offered diets containing urea or nitrate as the nitrogen source. Anim Prod Sci 2012;52:653-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11254
  7. Lewis D. The metabolism of nitrate and nitrite in the sheep. 2. Hydrogen donators in nitrate reduction by rumen microorganisms in vitro. Biochem J 1951;49:149-53. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0490149
  8. Dijkstra J, France J, Davies DR. Different mathematical approaches to estimating microbial protein supply in ruminants. J Dairy Sci 1998;81:3370-84. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75902-8
  9. Leng RA, Nolan JV. Symposium: protein nutrition of the lactating dairy cow. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J Dairy Sci 1984;67:1072-89. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(84)81409-5
  10. Troy SM, Duthie CA, Hyslop JJ, et al. Effectiveness of nitrate addition and increased oil content as methane mitigation strategies for beef cattle fed two contrasting basal diets. J Anim Sci 2015;93:1815-23. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8688
  11. Ungerfeld EM, Kohn RA. The role of thermodynamics in the control of ruminal fermentation. In: Sejrsen K, Hvelplund T, Nielsen MO, editors. Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism and impact of nutrition on gene expression, immunology and stress. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2006. pp. 55-85.
  12. Goodrich RD, Garrett JE, Gast DR, Kirick MA, Larson DA, Meiske JC. Influence of monensin on the performance of cattle. J Anim Sci 1984;58:1484-98. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5861484x
  13. Park T, Meulia T, Firkins JL, Yu Z. Inhibition of the rumen ciliate Entodinium caudatum by antibiotics. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01189
  14. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Washington DC, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
  15. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  16. SAS Institute Inc. SAS user's guide: statistic, version 5 edition. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute; 1996.
  17. Jouany JP. Effect of rumen protozoa on nitrogen utilization by ruminants. J Nutr 1996;126(Suppl 4):1335S-46S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/126.suppl_4.1335S
  18. Borucki Castro SI, Phillip LE, Lapierre H, Jardon PW, Berthiaume R. Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in treated soybean meal products. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:810-22. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71565-5
  19. Latham EA, Anderson RC, Pinchak WE, Nisbet DJ. Insights on alterations to the rumen ecosystem by nitrate and nitro-compounds. Front Microbiol 2016;7:228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00228
  20. Satter LD, Slyter LL. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro. Br J Nutr 1974;32:199-208. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19740073
  21. Yang WZ, Benchaar C, Ametaj BN, Chaves AV, He ML, McAllister TA. Effects of garlic and juniper berry essential oils on ruminal fermentation and on the site and extent of digestion in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:5671-81. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0369
  22. Guyader J, Eugene M, Doreau M, et al. Nitrate but not tea saponin feed additives decreased enteric methane emissions in nonlactating cows. J Anim Sci 2015;93:5367-77. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9367
  23. Suzuki T, Phaophaisal I, Pholsen P, et al. In vivo nutritive value of pangola grass (Digitaria eriantha) hay by a novel indirect calorimeter with a ventilated hood in Thailand. Jpn Agric Res Q 2008;42:123-9. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.42.123
  24. Bruning-Fann CS, Kaneene JB. The effects of nitrate, nitrite, and n-nitroso compounds on animal health. Vet Hum Toxicol 1993;35:237-53.