DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An efficient reliability analysis strategy for low failure probability problems

  • Cao, Runan (School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University) ;
  • Sun, Zhili (School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University) ;
  • Wang, Jian (School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University) ;
  • Guo, Fanyi (School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University)
  • 투고 : 2020.05.31
  • 심사 : 2021.03.26
  • 발행 : 2021.04.25

초록

For engineering, there are two major challenges in reliability analysis. First, to ensure the accuracy of simulation results, mechanical products are usually defined implicitly by complex numerical models that require time-consuming. Second, the mechanical products are fortunately designed with a large safety margin, which leads to a low failure probability. This paper proposes an efficient and high-precision adaptive active learning algorithm based on the Kriging surrogate model to deal with the problems with low failure probability and time-consuming numerical models. In order to solve the problem with multiple failure regions, the adaptive kernel-density estimation is introduced and improved. Meanwhile, a new criterion for selecting points based on the current Kriging model is proposed to improve the computational efficiency. The criterion for choosing the best sampling points considers not only the probability of misjudging the sign of the response value at a point by the Kriging model but also the distribution information at that point. In order to prevent the distance between the selected training points from too close, the correlation between training points is limited to avoid information redundancy and improve the computation efficiency of the algorithm. Finally, the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method are verified compared with other algorithms through two academic examples and one engineering application.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alibrandi, U., Alani, A.M. and Ricciardi, G. (2015), "A new sampling strategy for SVM-based response surface for structural reliability analysis", Prob. Eng. Mech., 41, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.04.001.
  2. Au, S.K. (2016), "On MCMC algorithm for subset simulation", Prob. Eng. Mech., 43, 117-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.12.003.
  3. Basaga, H.B., Bayraktar, A. and Kaymaz, I. (2012), "An improved response surface method for reliability analysis of structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(2),175-189. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-9228. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.2.175
  4. Beer, M. and Spanos, P.D. (2009), "A neural network approach for simulating stationary stochastic processes", Struct. Eng. Mech., 32(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.32.1.071.
  5. Cadini, F., Santos, F. and Zio, E. (2014), "An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 131, 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.023.
  6. Cao, Z., Dai, H. and Wang, W. (2011), "Low-discrepancy sampling for structural reliability sensitivity analysis", Struct. Eng. Mech., 38(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.38.1.125.
  7. Cheng, J., Cai, C.S. and Xiao, R.C. (2007), "Application of artificial neural networks to the response prediction of geometrically nonlinear truss structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 26(3), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.26.3.251.
  8. Echard, B., Gayton, N. and Lemaire, M. (2011), "AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation", Struct. Saf., 33(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002.
  9. Echard, B., Gayton, N., Lemaire, M. and Relun, N. (2013), "A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 111, 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.008.
  10. Fang, Y. and Teea, K.F. (2017), "Structural reliability analysis using response surface method with improved genetic algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., 62(2), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.2.139.
  11. Fauriat, W. and Gayton, N. (2014), "AK-SYS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 123, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.10.010.
  12. Ghasemi, S.H. and Nowaka, A.S. (2017), "Reliability index for non-normal distributions of limit state functions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 62(3), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.3.365.
  13. Kang, B.J., Kim, J.H. and Kim, Y. (2016), "Engineering criticality analysis on an offshore structure using the first- and second-order reliability method", Int. J. Naval Arch. Ocean Eng., 8(6), 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.05.014.
  14. Kmet, S., Tomko, M. and Brda, J. (2011), "Time-dependent analysis of cable trusses Part II. Simulation-based reliability assessment", Struct. Eng. Mech., 38(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.38.2.171.
  15. Liu, X., Wu, Y., Wang, B., Ding, J. and Jie, H. (2017), "An adaptive local range sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using support vector machine and Kriging model", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 55(6), 2285-2304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1641-9.
  16. Lv, Z., Lu, Z. and Wang, P. (2015), "A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering", Comput. Math. Appl., 70(5), 1182-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.07.004.
  17. Pan, Q. and Dias, D. (2017), "An efficient reliability method combining adaptive Support Vector Machine and Monte Carlo Simulation", Struct. Saf., 67, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.04.006.
  18. Puatatsananon, W. and Saouma, V.E. (2006), "Reliability analysis in fracture mechanics using the first-order reliability method and Monte Carlo simulation", Fatig. Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 29(11), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01009.x.
  19. Au, S.K. and Beck, J.L. (1999), "A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations", Struct. Saf., 21(2), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00014-4.
  20. Schobi, R., Sudret, B. and Marelli, S. (2017), "Rare event estimation using Polynomial-Chaos Kriging", ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst., Part A: Civil Eng., 3(2), D4016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000870.
  21. Song, H., Choi, K.K., Lee, I., Zhao, L. and Lamb, D. (2013), "Adaptive virtual support vector machine for reliability analysis of high-dimensional problems", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 47(4), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0857-6.
  22. Song, S.F. and Lu, Z.Z. (2007), "Improved line sampling reliability analysis method and its application", Key Eng. Mater., 353-358, 1001-1004. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.353-358.1001.
  23. Sun, Z., Wang, J., Li, R. and Tong, C. (2017), "LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 157, 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.09.003.
  24. Tong, C., Sun, Z., Zhao, Q., Wang, Q. and Wang, S. (2015), "A hybrid algorithm for reliability analysis combining Kriging and subset simulation importance sampling", J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 29(8), 3183-3193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0717-6.
  25. Vahedi, J., Ghasemi, M.R. and Miri, M. (2018), "Structural reliability assessment using an enhanced adaptive Kriging method", Struct. Eng. Mech., 66(6), 677-691. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.6.677.
  26. Wagstaff, K., Cardie, C. and Rogers, S. (2001), "Constrained k-means clustering with background knowledge", Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16081290.
  27. Wang, B., Wang, D., Jin, J. and Zhang, J. (2013), "Efficient estimation of the functional reliability of a passive system by means of an improved Line Sampling method", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 55, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.12.015.
  28. Wang, J. and Sun, Z. (2018), "The stepwise accuracy-improvement strategy based on the Kriging model for structural reliability analysis", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 58(2), 595-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1911-9.
  29. Wang, Z. and Shafieezadeh, A. (2018), "ESC: an efficient error-based stopping criterion for kriging-based reliability analysis methods", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 59(5), 1621-1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2150-9.
  30. Wanying, Y., Zhenzhou, L., Yicheng, Z. and Xian, J. (2018), "AK-SYSi: an improved adaptive Kriging model for system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes by a refined U learning function", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 59(1), 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2067-3.
  31. Yang, X., Liu, Y., Mi, C. and Wang, X. (2018), "Active learning Kriging model combining with Kernel-Density-Estimation-based importance sampling method for the estimation of low failure probability", J. Mech. Des., 140(5), https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039339.
  32. Yonezawa, M., Okuda, S. and Kobayashi, H. (2009), "Structural reliability estimation based on quasi ideal importance sampling simulation", Struct. Eng. Mech., 32(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.32.1.055.
  33. Yun, W., Lu, Z. and Jiang, X. (2018), "An efficient reliability analysis method combining adaptive Kriging and modified importance sampling for small failure probability", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 58(4), 1383-1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1975-6.
  34. Zhang, Y., Sun, Z., Yan, Y., Yu, Z. and Wang, J. (2019), "An efficient adaptive reliability analysis method based on Kriging and Weighted average nisclassification rate improvement", IEEE Access, 7, 94954-94965. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928332.
  35. Zhang, Z., Jiang, C., Wang, G.G. and Han, X. (2015), "First and second order approximate reliability analysis methods using evidence theory", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 137, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.12.011.
  36. Zhao, H., Yue, Z., Liu, Y., Gao, Z. and Zhang, Y. (2015), "An efficient reliability method combining adaptive importance sampling and Kriging metamodel", Appl. Math. Model., 39(7), 1853-1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.015.