DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Origin of Record Continuum Theory : Focusing on the Comparison with Record Lifecycle Model

레코드 컨티뉴엄 이론의 기원에 관한 연구 라이프사이클 모델과의 비교를 중심으로

  • 김명훈 (국립 강릉원주대학교, 인문사회 학술연구)
  • Received : 2021.03.03
  • Accepted : 2021.04.12
  • Published : 2021.04.30

Abstract

In this study, the origin of the record continuum theory was analyzed in conjunction with the record management situation in Australia after the mid-20th century and record lifecycle model. For an in-depth understanding of the record continuum theory, it is necessary to consider the background and process of its formation, and to analyze the lifecycle model itself in terms of a theoretical system built with reflections on the lifecycle model. To this end, first of all, with the aim of analyzing the historical background of the formation of the record continuum theory, the background and process that led to intensive illumination of the US lifecycle model in the process of seeking an independent public records management system in Australia in the 1950s were reviewed. Then, the meaning and limitations of the lifecycle model were considered along with the background of the formation. In order to examine the main contents, significance, and limitations of the lifecycle model, it is necessary to analyze the circumstances under which it was formed. Based on this analysis, finally, the problems associated with the application of the lifecycle model in Australia's new record creation environment, as well as the factors that were the origin of the newly born record continuum theory were examined.

본 연구에서는 레코드 컨티뉴엄 이론의 기원을 20세기 중반 이후 호주의 기록관리 상황 및 라이프사이클 모델과 결부하여 분석하였다. 레코드 컨티뉴엄 이론에 대한 심도 있는 이해를 위해서는 형성 배경 및 과정에 대한 고찰이 필요하며, 아울러 라이프사이클 모델에 대한 반향으로 구축된 이론체계란 점에서 라이프사이클 모델 자체에 대한 분석 역시 전제되어야 하기 때문이다. 이를 위해 우선 레코드 컨티뉴엄 이론형성의 역사적 배경 분석을 목표로, 1950년대 호주의 독립된 공공기록관리 체제의 모색 과정 속에서 미국의 라이프사이클 모델을 집중적으로 조명하게 된 배경 및 과정을 고찰하였다. 이어 라이프사이클 모델의 형성 배경과 함께 의미 및 한계를 고찰하였다. 라이프사이클 모델의 주요 내용 및 의의, 한계를 고찰하기 위해서는 어떠한 상황 속에서 형성되었는지에 대한 분석이 필요하며, 아울러 레코드 컨티뉴엄 이론이 라이프사이클 모델에 대한 비판을 통해 형성되었다면, 라이프사이클 모델이 지닌 의의 및 한계에 대한 고찰이 필요하기 때문이다. 이러한 분석을 토대로 마지막으로 호주의 새로운 기록생산 환경 속에 라이프사이클 모델의 적용에 따른 문제점과 더불어, 이를 기반으로 새롭게 태동된 레코드 컨티뉴엄 이론의 기원이 된 요소들을 고찰하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명훈 (2010). 레코드 컨티뉴엄과 평가, 그리고 기록콘텐츠: 기록콘텐츠 개념 정립을 위한 시론. 정보관리연구, 41(3).
  2. 김명훈 (2017). 레코드 컨티뉴엄 기반 기록콘텐츠의 의미 모색: 종교기관 기록콘텐츠 사례를 중심으로. 기록학연구, 52.
  3. 김익한 (2002). EDMS와 기록의 라이프사이클. 기록학연구, 5.
  4. 김익한 (2003). DIRKS-Manual의 실용적 적용. 기록학연구, 8.
  5. 노명환 (2016). 기호학 및 '성리학적 구성주의' 이론을 적용한 기록과 기록관리 행위의 본질과 사회적 역할의 이해: 레코드 컨티뉴엄의 보완에 초점을 맞추어. 역사문화연구, 57.
  6. 노명환 (2017). '개념적 구성물로서의 기록'의 관점에서 보는 조선시대 성리학 세계관과 기록.기록관리. 기록학연구, 51.
  7. 배영수 (1997). 역사와 정치의 교차로: 미국 문서관 제도의 위치. 역사비평, 1997년 봄호.
  8. 원종관 (2007). 레코드 컨티뉴엄의 속성을 통해 본 증거와 기억의 조화에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 한국외국어대학교 대학원 정보기록관리학과.
  9. 이승억 (2001). 한국 공공분야 '기록보유(Recordkeeping)' 체제 전망: '기록물분류기준표의'의 제도적 의의와 특성. 기록학연구, 4.
  10. Cunningham, Adrian (2002). 호주의 공공기록 관리 전략: 동적 기술. 이승억 역. 기록보존, 15.
  11. Jenkinson, Hilary (1937). A Manual of Archive Administration. 정부기록보존소 옮김. (2003). 기록관리편람. 대전: 정부기록보존소.
  12. Schellenberg, Theodore R. (1956). Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. 이원영 옮김. (2002). 현대 기록학개론. 서울: 진리탐구.
  13. Schellenberg, Theodore R. (1956) The Appraisal of Modern Public Records. 오항녕 옮김. (2005). 현대 공공기록의 평가. 기록학의 평가론. 서울: 진리탐구.
  14. Angel, Herbe (1968). Archival Janus: The Records Center. American Archivist, 31(1).
  15. Atherton, Jay (1985-1986). From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management-Archives Relationship. Archivaria, 21.
  16. Bailey, Catherine (1989-1990). Archival Theory and Electronic Records. Archivaria, 29.
  17. Brooks, Philip C. (1940). The Selection of Records for Preservation. American Archivist, 3(4).
  18. Brooks, Philip C. (1948). Archival Procedures for Planned Records Retirement. American Archivist, 11(4).
  19. Brothman, Brien (2001). The Past that Archives Keep: Memory, History, and the Preservation of Archival Records. Archivaria, 51.
  20. Brown, Gerald (1971). The Archivist and the Records Manager: A Records Manager's Viewpoint. Records Management Quarterly, 5(January).
  21. Cook, Terry (1997). What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas since 1898 and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archivaria, 43.
  22. Cook, Terry (2000). Beyond the Screen: The Records Continuum and Archival Cultural Heritage. Paper presented at the Australian Society of Archivists Conference. http://www.mybestdocs.com/cook-t-beyondthescreen-000818.htm
  23. Cunnigham, Adrian (2005). Archival Institutions. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Reed, Barbara, Upward, Frank eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  24. Dingwall, Glenn (2010). Life Cycle and Continuum: A View of Recordkeeping Models from the Postwar Era. Currents of Archival Thinking. Eastwood, Terry and MacNeil, Heather eds. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unilimited.
  25. Dollar, Charles M. (1993). Archivists and Records Managers in the Information Age. Archivaria, 36.
  26. Evans, Frank B. (1967). Archivists and Records Managers: Variations on a Theme. American Archivist, 30(1).
  27. Flynn, Sarah J. A. (2001). The Records Continuum Model in Context and Its Implications for Archival Practice. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1).
  28. Gracy II, David B. (1987). Is There a Future in the Use of Archives?. Archivaria, 24.
  29. Hammitt, J. J. (1965). Government Archivists and Records Management. American Archivist, 28(2).
  30. Hoke, Gordon E. J. (2011). Records Life Cycle: A Cradle-to-Grave Metaphor. Information Management Journal, 45(5).
  31. Holmes, Oliver W. (1949). The National Archives At a Turn in the Road, American Archivist, 12(3).
  32. Krauskopf, Robert W. (1958). The Hoover Commission and Federal Recordkeeping. American Archivist, 21(4).
  33. Maclean, Ian (1956). Trends in Organising Modern Public Records with Special Reference to Classification Needs. Archives & Manuscripts, 1(3).
  34. Maclean, Ian (1959). Australian Experience in Records and Archives Management. American Archivist, 22(4).
  35. McEachreon, Peggy (2012). Records Life Cycle / Continuum Models. Off The Record(The Newsletter of the Archives Association of Ontario), 28(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303785657_Records_Life_CycleContinuum_Models
  36. McKemmish, Sue (2001). Placing Records Continuum Theory and Practice. Archival Science, 1(4).
  37. McKemmish, Sue (2005). Traces: Document, Record, Archive, Archives. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Reed, Barbara, Upward, Frank eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
  38. McKemmish, Sue (2017). Recordkeeping in the Continuum: An Australian Tradition. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Gilliland, Anne J., McKemmish, Sue & Lau, Andrew J. eds. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.
  39. Piggott, Michael (1998). The History of Australian Record-keeping: A Framework for Research. The Australian Library Journal, 47(4).
  40. Piggott, Michael (2012). Archives and Societal Provenance: Australian Essays. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
  41. Posner, Ernst (1940). Some Aspects of Archival Developments Since the French Revolution. American Archivist, 3(3).
  42. Reed, Babara (2005a). Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the Potential of Pluralised Recordkeeping. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1).
  43. Reed, Babara (2005b). Reading the Records Continuum: Interpretations and Explorations. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1).
  44. Scott, Peter J. (1966). The Record Group Concept: A Case for Abandonment. American Archivist, 29(4).
  45. Stoler. Ann Laura (2002). Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance. Archival Science, 2(1-2).
  46. Stuckey, Steve (1994). Keepers of the Fame? The Custodial Role of Australian Archives -Its History and Its Future. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael eds. Clayton, Vic.: Ancora in association with Australian Archives.
  47. TheDataVault (2011). Records Life Cycle Renewed. https://thedatavault.com/recordslife-cycle-renewed/
  48. Upward, Frank (1994). In Search of the Continuum: Ian Maclean's 'Australian Experience' Essays on Recordkeeping. https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/In_search_of_the_continuum_Ian_Maclean_s_Australian_Experience_Essays_on_Recordkeeping/4060014
  49. Upward, Frank (1996). Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial Principles and Properties. https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/Structuring_the_records_continuum_-_part_one_postcustodial_principles_and_properties/4037445/1
  50. Upward, Frank (2000). Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes, and Beyond - A Personal Reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000007262
  51. Vincent, Carl (1976-1977). The Record Group: A Concept in Evolution. Archivaria, 3.
  52. Wagland, Mark & Kelly, Russell (1994). The Series System: A Revolution in Archival Control. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael eds. Clayton, Vic.: Ancora in association with Australian Archives.
  53. Yusof, Zawiyah M. & Chell, Robert W. (2000). The Records Life Cycle: An Inadequate Concept for Technology-generated Records. Information Development, 16(3).

Cited by

  1. 전자기록 환경에서 레코드 컨티뉴엄의 의의와 한계: 기록의 의미 및 속성을 중심으로 vol.21, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2021.21.3.001
  2. 행정정보 데이터세트 기록관리 적용 사례 분석: 전자인사관리시스템 데이터세트 관리기준표 작성을 중심으로 vol.21, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2021.21.3.227