Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회지)

The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship between Flight Crew's Regulatory Focus and Adaptive Performance - Organizational Commitment as a Moderator -

조절초점과 적응수행의 관계에서 조직유효성의 영향 - 조직몰입의 조절효과 -

  • Received : 2020.11.26
  • Accepted : 2021.01.12
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the effect of regulatory focus on adaptative performance for pilots and co-pilots engaged in domestic civil airlines, and verified the moderating effect of organizational commitment in the process of regulatory focus on adaptative performance. For study, the scale developed by Lockwood Penelope and others validated and developed to measure the regulatory focus was adapted to suit the aviation scene and examined through this. As a result of the study, among the sub-variables of the regulatory focus scale, the promotion focus had a statistically significant and positive effect on the adaptative performance. and derived that the prevention focus had a statistically significant negative effect on the adaptative performance. In order to examine the moderating effect of organizational commitment in the relationship between regulatory focus and adaptative performance, the results of hierarchical regression analysis were conducted after controlling the rank, background, and career. Organizational commitment showed a statistically significant positive moderating effect in the relationship of adaptative performance. In addition, as a result of the verification according to the level of organizational commitment, prevention focus and adaptative performance showed statistically significant negative effects when organizational commitment was high.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, D. S., Kim, S. N., and Sohn, Y. W., "The relationship between flight crew's individual cultural values and crew resource management(crm) performance: Psychological safety as a moderator", Journal of The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 25(4), 2017, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.12985/KSAA.2017.25.4.001
  2. Moon, B. S. and Kim, C. Y., "A study on the cultural trait of Korean pilots: Focused on the typology of preferring value", Journal of The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 9(1), 2001, pp. 16-30.
  3. International Air Transport Association, "IATA Annual review 2016: Safety", 2016, pp. 15-20.
  4. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., and Kunda, Z., "Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 2002, pp. 854-864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
  5. Higgins, E. T., "Making a good decision: Value from fit", American Psychologist, 55(11), 2000, pp. 1214-1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1214
  6. Higgins, E. T., "Promotion and Prevention as a Motivational Duality. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology", Guilford Press, New York, 1999, pp. 503-525.
  7. Allworth, E., Hesketh, B., "Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change related and contextully relevant future performance", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 1999, pp. 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00110
  8. Borman, W. C. and Motowildo, S. J., "Task Performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel research", Human Performance, 10, 1997, pp. 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
  9. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Uhlman, C. E., and Costanza, D. P., "Personality, adaptability, and performance: Performance on well-defined and ill-defined problem solving tasks", Human Performance, 6, 1993, pp. 241-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0603_4
  10. Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S. Donovan, M., and Plamondon, K. E., "Adaptability in the work place: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 2000, pp. 612-624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
  11. Meyer, J. P. and Allen, N. J., "A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment", Human Resource Management Review, 1, 1991, pp. 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  12. Crowe, E., and Higgins, E. T., "Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 69, 1997, pp. 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
  13. Har H. R. and Kang, H. J., "The effects of regulatory focus on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in police officers: The mediating effects of self-efficacy", Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies, 26(2), 2012, pp. 121-142. https://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2012.26.2.121
  14. Burke, C. S., Pierce, L. G., and Salas, E., "Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance within Complex Environments", Elsevier JAI, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2006.
  15. Hesketh, B. and Neal, A., "Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The Changing Nature Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development", Jossy-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1999, pp. 21-55.
  16. Ilgen, D. R., Pulakos, E. D., "Employee performance in today's organizations. In D. R. Ilgen, & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The Changing Nature Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development", Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1999, pp. 1-20.
  17. Niessen, C., Swarowsky, C., and Leiz, M., "Age and adaptation to changes in the work place", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 2010, pp. 356-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011035287
  18. Oho, H. S. and Ha, J. H., "The effects of regulatory focus, work motivation, self-efficacy, on psychological well-being and work performance in employees' of public enterprise", Korean Journal of Counseling And Psychotherapy, 22(5), 2010, pp. 515-532.
  19. Bang, E. J., "The causes and results of promotion focus culture and prevention focus culture: Focused on the differences between public and private sectors", Master of Science in Psychology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Feb. 2009.
  20. Mathieu, J. E. and Zajac, D. M., "A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment", Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 1990, pp. 171-194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
  21. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L., and Topolnytsky, L., "Affective, continuance and normative commitment to organization: A meta analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 2002, pp. 20-52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
  22. O'Reilly, C. A. and Chatman, J. "Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior", Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 1986, pp. 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.492
  23. Allen, N. J. and Meyer, J. P., "The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization", Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(2), 1990, pp. 275-297.
  24. Yoo, T. Y., Kim, D. Y., and Hyun, H. J., "The effect of person Organization fit in personality type on organizational member's attitude and behavior toward organization", Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 2002, pp. 65-87.
  25. Charbonnier-Voirin, A., Akremi, A. E., and Vandenberghe, C., "A multi level model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation", Group & Organization Management, 35, 2010, pp. 699-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390833
  26. Kim, B. H., "The moderating effects of person-environment fit on the relationships between transformational leadership and adaptive performance", Ph.D in Business Administration, Soongsil University, Seoul, 2014.
  27. Kim, J. H., "The effects of perceived organizational support, teamwork, organizational commitment on organizational cynicism", Korea Corporation Management Association, 18(3), 2011, pp. 1-16.
  28. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., and Reno, R. R., "Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions", Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1991.
  29. Hayes, A. F., "Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional PROCESS Analysis: A Regression-based Approach", Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2013.