Journal of Service Research and Studies (서비스연구)

The Society of service Science (서비스사이언스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Servicism Model for Korean

서비스주의 한국인 모델 연구

  • Hyunsoo Kim (School of Business Administration, Kookmin University)
  • 김현수 (국민대 경영대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2021.09.25
  • Accepted : 2021.12.17
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to derive a Korean model that can permanently maintain and develop Korea. After analyzing Korean society, especially modern Korea, which was the foundation of the founding of the Republic of Korea, a Korean model that can lead Korean society as a sustainable society in human society was derived. The situation of Korea and Koreans was analyzed from a fundamental level. We analyzed the root causes of deepening division and conflict and vague concepts of freedom and justice, and presented a Korean model of the Republic of Korea based on the founding ideology and constitutional spirit of the Republic of Korea to solve these problems. The necessary conditions for being a Korean were derived from the founding ideology and constitutional spirit of the Republic of Korea, the indigenous ideology of Korea, and the fashion and lifestyle of Koreans, derived. In addition, basic axioms for the Korean model were presented, and the structure of the Korean model was designed based on this. The Korean model is presented so that Korean society can lead the human society and be happy for a long time. Reflecting the results of in-depth analysis of the ideological foundations of modern Koreans, a new long-term sustainable structure for Koreans with various ideologies to live well together was proposed. The new Korean model was named the service-oriented Korean model. This is because it is a model centered on thorough checks and balances between all opponents, because it is a multidimensional dynamic Korean model rather than a simple linear one-dimensional Korean model, and because it is a Hwajaengtaeguk model that accurately expresses the identity of Koreans. It was proposed as a model for the sustainable development of Korean society. A follow-up study on specific Korean education programs is needed in the future.

본 연구는 대한민국을 영속적으로 유지 발전시킬 수 있는 한국인 모델 도출을 위해 수행되었다. 한국사회를 분석하고, 특히 대한민국 건국의 주역이 된 근대 한국의 한국인을 심층 분석한 후, 지속 가능한 인류사회로서의 중심으로서 한국사회를 이끌어갈 수 있는 한국인 모델을 도출하였다. 대한민국과 한국인의 상황을 근본적 차원에서 분석하였다. 분열과 갈등이 심화되고 있고 자유와 정의의 개념조차 모호해지는 근본 원인을 분석하고, 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 대한민국의 건국이념과 헌법정신에 기반을 둔 대한민국의 한국인 모델을 제시하였다. 한국인으로서의 필요조건은 대한민국의 건국이념과 헌법정신, 한국의 고유사상과 한국인의 멋과 생활 등을 통해 도출하였으며, 한국인으로서의 충분조건은 인류사회의 리더 및 구성원으로서 한국인이 가져야하는 바람직한 사상을 기반으로 도출하였다. 또한 한국인 모델을 위한 기본 공리를 제시하고, 이를 기반으로 한국인 모델의 구조를 디자인하였다. 한국인이 인류사회를 이끌어가는 주체가 되어 오래도록 행복할 수 있도록 한국인 모델을 제시하였다. 현대 한국인의 사상적 기반에 대한 심층적 분석 결과를 반영하여, 다양한 사상을 가진 한국인들이 함께 잘 살 수 있는 장기 지속 가능한 새로운 구조를 제시하였다. 새로운 한국인 모델은 서비스주의 한국인 모델로 명명되었다. 모든 대립자들 간의 철저한 견제와 균형이 중심이 되는 모델이기 때문이며, 단순 선형 1차원 한국인 모델이 아니라 다차원 동태적 모델이기 때문이고, 또한 한국인의 정체성을 정확하게 표현하는 화쟁태극 모델이기 때문이다. 한국사회의 지속적 발전이 가능할 수 있는 모델로 제안되었다. 향후 구체적인 한국인 교육 프로그램에 대한 후속 연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho(1968), Politeness and Persistence, Korea Liberal Arts High School Korean III Textbook, The Ministry of Culture and Education, 1968
  2. Ham, Jaebong (2021a), Making Korean II, H Press
  3. Ham, Jaebong (2021b), Making Korean I, H Press
  4. Ham, Jaebong (2020), Making Korean III, H Press
  5. KBS(2020), Princeton University, Removing Woodrow Wilson by 'Race Discrimination', KBS News, 2020. 7. 6
  6. Kim, Hyunsoo (2021a), A Servicism Model of the New Society and Education System, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.11, No.3 Sept. 2021, pp.75-97
  7. Kim, Hyunsoo (2021b), A Servicism Model of the New Politics and Administration System, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.11, No.2, Jun. 2021, pp.1-19 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2021.11.2.001
  8. Kim, Hyunsoo (2021c), A Servicism Model of the New Economy System, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.11, No.1, Mar. 2021, pp.1-20
  9. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019a), A Study on Service Philosophy for New Economy and Society, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.4, Dec. 2019, pp.1-17 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2019.9.4.001
  10. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019b), A Study on the Service Philosophy of Major Western Ideology, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.3, Sept. 2019, pp.1-16
  11. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019c), A Study on the Service Philosophy of Mainstream Oriental Ideology, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.2, June 2019, pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2019.9.2.001
  12. Kim, Hyunsoo (2019d), A Study on the Service Philosophy of Major Korean Ideology, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.9, No.1, March 2019, pp.1-16
  13. Kim, Hyunsoo (2017), A Study on Korean Traditional Philosophy as the Service Economy Philosophy, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.7, No.3, Sept. 2017, pp.105-118
  14. Kim, Sanggoo(2014), Kim Go Hearing, Magic House
  15. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation(2021), Constitution of the Republic of Korea
  16. Lamprecht, S.P.(1992), Our Philosophical Traditions, Kim Taegil, etc. Tr., Eulyou Culture Co.
  17. Lao-Tzu(1982), Tao Te Ching, Ki Keun Chang Tr., Samsung Publishing Co.
  18. Lee, Keun Chul(2011), Research on Cheonbugyung Philosophy, Serving People Publisher, 2011.4
  19. Lee, Kidong(2010), Lecture on The Book Of Changes, Sungkyunkwan University Press
  20. Lee, Seungman (2018), Independence Spirit, Bibong Publishing Co.
  21. Lee, Sungmoo(2010), Justificationism of Korean, The Seoul Shinmun, p.30, May 7th, 2010
  22. Lee, Younghoon (2021), 'Our Ethnic Group' disagree with Real Korean History, Lee Seungman TV Lecture, 2021.7
  23. Myers(2014), Interview with Munhwailbo, 2021.12.19
  24. Namuwiki(2021), Daekkmun, Namu.wiki
  25. NAVER Knowledge Encyclopedia(2021), The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Physics Stroll, Jongpil Lee.
  26. Park, Chanseung(2014), Korea Independence Movement History, History Review Co.
  27. Plutarchos (2019), Lee, S. K. Tr., Bioi Paralleloi, Modern Intellect.
  28. Pung, W. R.(2017), Park, S. K. Tr., The History of China Philosophy, Kkachi.
  29. Samachun(2017), So, J. S. Tr., Samachun Saki 56, Modern Intellect.
  30. Song, Hogeun(2006), Equalitarianism in Korea, SERI
  31. The DuburuMinjoo Party(2021), The DuburuMinjoo Party Doctrine(https://theminjoo.kr/)
  32. The People Power Party(2021), The People Power Party Doctrine (https://www.peoplepowerparty.kr/)