Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Measuring of Combat Effectiveness for Naval Frigates Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

AHP를 이용한 해군 호위함 전투효과 측정에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Kitae (System Analysis Center, ROK Naval Force Analysis Test Evaluation Group) ;
  • Lim, Yojoon (Division of Liberal Arts, Kangnam University)
  • 김기태 (해군전력분석시험평가단 체계분석처) ;
  • 임요준 (강남대학교 교양학부)
  • Received : 2020.12.06
  • Accepted : 2021.02.26
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Modern combat has been extended to the concept of real-time response to a variety of threats simultaneously occurring in vast areas. In order to quick command determination and accurate engagement in these threats, the combat system has emerged in frigate. Frigates conduct anti-surface, anti-submarine, and anti-aircraft as the core forces of the fleet. In this study, the combat effectiveness measures naval frigates using AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method. A hierarchical structure for measuring the combat effectiveness was developed, and weights of criteria were calculated by expert surveys and pair-wise comparisons. In addition, the combat effectiveness of frigates was synthesized and compared. The weights for each attribute were calculated, and the weights for the three main attributes were in the order of act (0.594), evaluate (0.277), and see (0.129). As a result of calculating the weight, anti surface warfare (0.203) was the highest. The combat effectiveness of FFG Batch-III, which has advanced hardware and software and improved combat system capabilities, see (1.73 to 2.56 times), evaluate (1.68 to 2.08 times), and act (1.31 to 3.80 times) better than the comparative frigate. In summarizing the combat effects of the frigate, FFG Batch-III was 1.41~2.95 times superior to the comparative frigate. In particular, a group of experts evaluated the act importantly, resulting in better combat effectiveness.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, K.H., A Study on the Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness for the New Generation Multiple Launcher Rocket System Using AHP & Parametric Estimating, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2010, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 84-90.
  2. Chung, S.M., Park, K.J., Kim, H.C., Park, Y.M., Lim, Y.J., Lee, J.H., Cho, H.J., and Kim, H.K., A Study on the Operation Tactics for the Ulsan Class Batch-3 Combat System, Changwon, Korea : Naval Academy, 2019.
  3. Jolene, M., Eric, R.L., Joshua, T., Alfred, T.D., Daniel, Q., John, G., Kenneth, R., Curt, W., and Mark, B., An Analysis of the Open Architecture Warfare System Domain Model for Surface Time Critical Targets, [Master's Thesis], [California, USA] : Naval Postgraduate School, 2007.
  4. Jung, W.S., Lee, J.Y., and Kim, Y.H., An Assessment of Combat Effectiveness for C4I System Considering Network Effect, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2010, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 23-32.
  5. Kang, S.C., A Study on the Analysis of Combat Effectiveness of the Ground Tactical C4I Systems using AHP, [Master's Thesis], [Seoul, Korea] : Korea National Defense University, 2001.
  6. Kim, J.H. and Lee, C.J., AHP/DEA-AR Model Design for Structural Efficiency Analysis of Naval Combat Ships, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 2019, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 59-72.
  7. Kim, J.W., Kwon, T.H., Joo, S.H., and Choi, J.M., Principles and Understanding of Combat System, Changwon, Korea : Naval Education & Training Command, 2016.
  8. Kim, K.T. and Jeon, G.W., Efficiency Evaluation for Battleships by using AHP & DEA Model, Journal of Military Science and Technology Studies, 2007, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 68-91.
  9. Lee, I.H., 5-year plan for shipping reconstruction and Established Ocean Promotion Corporation, Maritime Korea, 2018, Vol. 543, pp. 20-21.
  10. Lee, J.M., Jeong, C.Y., and Lee, J.Y., The Combat Effectiveness Analysis of Attack Helicopter Using Simulation and AHP, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 2010, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 63-70.
  11. Lee, M.H., Moon, H.K., and Park, C.W., Development of Defense Simulation Model for Ground Weapon System Effectiveness Analysis, Proceedings of the Korea Society for Simulation, 2002, pp. 131-136.
  12. Lee, S.E., Development Status and Future Directions of Naval Combat System, Journal of Maritime Strategy, 2011, Vol. 150, pp. 1-24.
  13. Lee, S.Y. and Lee, J.Y., A Study on the Assessment of Force Improvement Effectiveness of KNTDS, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 2001, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 56-75.
  14. Ministry of Government Legislation, Act on Organization of National Armed Forces, Ver. 10821(3), 2011.
  15. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 5-year plan for shipping reconstruction, 2018.
  16. Park, S.K. and Lee J.Y., A Study on the Assessment of Power Improvement Effectiveness of Corps Level C4I System Applied to Integrated Fire Operation, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 2003, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 8-27.
  17. ROK Navy Headquarters, Naval doctrine, 2017.
  18. ROK Navy Homepage(https://www.navy.mil.kr/), Military Archives, 2020.
  19. Saaty, T.L., Decision Making for Leaders; The Analytic Hierarchy Process Decisions in an Complex World, RWS Publications, 1982.
  20. Song, Y.I. and Lee, G.L., A Study on the Improvement Effectiveness of Ship Combat System by using the Simulation Model, Journal of Military Science and Technology Studies, 2009, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 74-93.