지역사회간호학회지 (Research in Community and Public Health Nursing)

  • 제32권1호
  • /
  • Pages.24-39
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-9594(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4203(eISSN)
한국지역사회간호학회 (Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Trends in Willingness to Pay Research in Healthcare Service of Korea

  • Seo, Soyoung (Graduate School, Department of Nursing Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Jang, Soong-Nang (Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.19
  • 심사 : 2021.01.04
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study was to review the previous studies on the 'Willingness to Pay (WTP)' for healthcare services and suggest future implications for nursing research. Methods: Using the scoping review method, we used RISS, KISS, KMbase, Koreamed, PubMed, EMbase, CINAHL as searching engines. According to the selection and exclusion criteria, 40 appropriate studies were selected and analyzed. Results: 24 studies were categorized into medical service field among medical, public health, and nursing service fields. A total of 16 studies were related to healthcare system (policies), 13 studies were to the healthcare intervention, and 11 studies were categorized into the health management. Most of the methods for eliciting WTP (70%) were about a contingent valuation method (CVM), and the use of double bounded dichotomous choice (DBDC) tended to increase. In the nursing field, five WTP studies were identified: two studies published in the early years of 2000, which were conducted on hospital-based home health visit services. Recent studies were mostly about counseling and education by advanced practice nurses (APNs). Conclusion: WTP studies on healthcare services were largely published from the medical fields and health policy areas with the CVM method. In the field of nursing, studies have been conducted on the subject of limited service areas. More active exploration of research topics is required, particularly under the current policy setting, where discussion of the public health insurance fee for nursing practice is essential.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ko SK, Park JY. Determination of nursing price using willingness to pay. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2001;7(2):205-221.
  2. Kim NJ, Lee YK, Kim HJ, Cheung OJ, Song NG, Jun MS. Activity to reduce the record missing for nursing care charge. Journal of Korean Society Quality Assurance in Health Care. 2009;15(1):73-78.
  3. HIRA. Overview of health insurance fee system [Internet]. Wonju: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. 2020 [cited 2020 September 05]. Available from: http://www.hira.or.kr/dummy.do?pgmid=HIRAA020028000000
  4. Lee TJ, Lee SH. Estimation of willingness to pay for long-term care insurance using the contingent valuation method. Health Policy and Management. 2006;16(1):95-116. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2006.16.1.095
  5. Choi HS, Suk HW. Discovering public service preferences of citizen groups using willingness to pay. The Korea Local Administration Review. 2018;32(1):95-124. https://doi.org/10.22783/KRILA.2018.32.1.95.
  6. Yang BM, Kim JH, Lee TJ, Bae EY. Health care economics. Paju: Nanam; 2013. 464 p.
  7. Donaldson C, Shackley P. Willingness to Pay for Health Care. In: Scott A, Maynard A, Elliott R, editors. Advances in health economics. Chichester WS: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003. p. 1-20.
  8. McDougall JA, Furnback WE, Wang BCM, Mahlich J. Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2020;8(1): 1717030. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030
  9. Lee JH, Lee YE, Lee MH, Sohn SK. A study on the expressed desire at discharge of patients to use home nursing and affecting factors of the desire. Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing. 1999;2(2):257-270.
  10. Lee EK, Ryu GC, Jung Y-H, Lim JY, Ko S, Park S-J, et al. Policy directions to facilitate the economic evaluation of new health technologies: focused on pharmaceuticals. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health And Social Affairs; 2005 December. Report No.: 2005-02.
  11. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  12. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare. 2015;13(3):141-146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
  13. Lim JY, Song MS, Han YR, Kim EJ, Choi KW, Sung YM. Willingness to pay for cognitive enhancement program for elders. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing. 2010;24(2): 173-181. https://doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2010.24.2.173
  14. Olsen JA, Smith RD. Theory versus practice: A review of 'willingness-to-pay' in health and health care. Health Economics. 2001;10(1):39-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1%3C39::AIDHEC563%3E3.0.CO;2-E
  15. Lee JY. Valuing public goods using the life satisfaction approach. Sejong: Korean Development Institute; 2015 December. Report No.: 2015-04.
  16. Klose T. The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy. 1999;47(2):97-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(99)00010-X
  17. Cummings RG, Elliott S, Harrison GW, Murphy J. Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible? Journal of Political Economy. 1997;105(3):609-621. https://doi.org/10.1086/262084
  18. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register. 1993;58(10):4601-4614.
  19. Hanemann M, Loomis J, Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1991;73(4):1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
  20. Ko CM, Koh CK, Kwon SH, Ko JW. Breast cancer self-care education and payment to advanced practice nurses: A web-based research study. Nursing Economic$. 2020;38(3):133-141.
  21. Park BH, Ko YK. Hospital preferences of nursing students in Korea: A discrete choice experiment approach. Human Resources for Health. 2016;14(1):58-68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0156-1
  22. Ko YK, Park B, Ryu JI. Hospital preferences of Korean nurses using a discrete choice experiment. Korean Journal of Health Economics and Policy. 2018;24(2):107-128.
  23. Lee MJ. Nurses' perception and willingness to pay for nursing career ladder system in general hospital. Korean Journal of Hospital Management. 2019;24(3):61-71.
  24. Park OY, Jung MS. Analysis of the nursing interventions performed in the medical & surgical units and the health insurance cost items based on the NIC. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2005;11(4):1-19.
  25. Kim DS, Kim SH, Kim KS, Jun MH, Kim J, Lee HJ. The real picture of the care costs paid to Korean oncology advanced practice nurses. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2011;11(2):155-162. https://doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.2.155
  26. Kim MS, Moon SY, Kim JA, Shim OS, Kim JH. Estimation of nursing cost for hemodialysis using RBRVS(Resource Based Relative Value Scale). Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2003;9(2):205-216.
  27. Kim YM, Nam HK, Sung YH, Park KO, Park HO. A survey for developing strategies to improve the fees for nursing care. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2008;14(1):5-14.