DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Conclusions and Suggestions on Low-Dose and Low-Dose Rate Radiation Risk Estimation Methodology

  • Sakai, Kazuo (Higashigaoka Faculty of Nursing, Tokyo Healthcare University) ;
  • Yamada, Yutaka (Department of Radioecology and Fukushima Project, Center for Advanced Radiation Emergency Medicine, Quantum Medical Science Directorate, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology) ;
  • Yoshida, Kazuo (Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry) ;
  • Yoshinaga, Shinji (Department of Environmetrics and Biometrics, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Sato, Kaoru (Environment and Radiation Sciences Division, Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency) ;
  • Ogata, Hiromitsu (Graduate School of Nutrition Sciences, Kagawa Nutrition University) ;
  • Iwasaki, Toshiyasu (Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry) ;
  • Kudo, Shin'ichi (Institute of Radiation Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Association) ;
  • Asada, Yasuki (Deviation of Medical Physics, Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University) ;
  • Kawaguchi, Isao (Center for Radiation Protection Knowledge, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology) ;
  • Haeno, Hiroshi (Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo) ;
  • Sasaki, Michiya (Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry)
  • Received : 2020.11.27
  • Accepted : 2021.02.01
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Background: For radiological protection and control, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) provides the nominal risk coefficients related to radiation exposure, which can be extrapolated using the excess relative risk and excess absolute risk obtained from the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki with the dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF). Materials and Methods: Since it is impossible to directly estimate the radiation risk at doses less than approximately 100 mSv only from epidemiological knowledge and data, support from radiation biology is absolutely imperative, and thus, several national and international bodies have advocated the importance of bridging knowledge between biology and epidemiology. Because of the accident at the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO)'s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station in 2011, the exposure of the public to radiation has become a major concern and it was considered that the estimation of radiation risk should be more realistic to cope with the prevailing radiation exposure situation. Results and Discussion: To discuss the issues from wide aspects related to radiological protection, and to realize bridging knowledge between biology and epidemiology, we have established a research group to develop low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation risk estimation methodology, with the permission of the Japan Health Physics Society. Conclusion: The aim of the research group was to clarify the current situation and issues related to the risk estimation of low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation exposure from the viewpoints of different research fields, such as epidemiology, biology, modeling, and dosimetry, to identify a future strategy and roadmap to elucidate a more realistic estimation of risk against low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation exposure.

Keywords

References

  1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1-332.
  2. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Effects of ionizing radiation. Volume I: Report to the general assembly, scientific annexes A and B. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2006.
  3. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. Volume I: Report to the general assembly, scientific annex A. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2013.
  4. World Health Organization. Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.
  5. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Uncertainties in the estimation of radiation risks and probability of disease causation (NCRP Report No. 171). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2012.
  6. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Approaches for integrating information from radiation biology and epidemiology to enhance low-dose health risk assessment (NCRP Report No. 186). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2020.
  7. National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
  8. Japan Health Physics Society. Reports of JHPS Research Group on low-dose and low-dose-rate radiation risk estimation methodology (vol. 11, no. 1) [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Health Physics Society; 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 11]. Available from: http://www.jhps.or.jp/upimg/files/report11.1.pdf.
  9. Richardson DB, Cardis E, Daniels RD, Gillies M, O'Hagan JA, Hamra GB, et al. Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS). BMJ. 2015;351:h5359.
  10. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C, et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007;167:396-416. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr0553.1
  11. Kudo S, Ishida J, Yoshimoto K, Ohshima S, Furuta H, Kasagi F. The adjustment effects of confounding factors on radiation risk estimates: findings from a Japanese epidemiological study on low-dose radiation effects (J-EPISODE). J Mol Genet Med. 2017;11:1000275.
  12. Gilbert ES, Sokolnikov ME, Preston DL, Schonfeld SJ, Schadilov AE, Vasilenko EK, et al. Lung cancer risks from plutonium: an updated analysis of data from the Mayak worker cohort. Radiat Res. 2013;179:332-342. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3054.1
  13. Kudo S, Ishida J, Yoshimoto K, Furuta H, Kasagi F. Differences in the methods used in radiation epidemiological cohort studies among nuclear workers in each country. Hoken Butsuri (Online). 2017;52:265-274. https://doi.org/10.5453/jhps.52.265
  14. Jacob P, Ruhm W, Walsh L, Blettner M, Hammer G, Zeeb H. Is cancer risk of radiation workers larger than expected? Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:789-796. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.043265
  15. Shore R, Walsh L, Azizova T, Ruhm W. Risk of solid cancer in low dose-rate radiation epidemiological studies and the dose-rate effectiveness factor. Int J Radiat Biol. 2017;93:1064-1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2017.1319090
  16. Haley BM, Paunesku T, Grdina DJ, Woloschak GE. The increase in animal mortality risk following exposure to sparsely ionizing radiation is not linear quadratic with dose. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140989
  17. Tran V, Little MP. Dose and dose rate extrapolation factors for malignant and non-malignant health endpoints after exposure to gamma and neutron radiation. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2017;56:299-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-017-0707-4
  18. Niwa O, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Globus RK, Harrison JD, Hendry JH, Jacob P, et al. ICRP Publication 131: stem cell biology with respect to carcinogenesis aspects of radiological protection. Ann ICRP. 2015;44:7-357.
  19. Conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation: adopted by the ICRP and ICRU in September 1995. Ann ICRP. 1996;26:1-205.
  20. Menzel HG, Clement C, DeLuca P. ICRP Publication 110. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. A report of adult reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2009;39:1-164.
  21. Petoussi-Henss N, Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Endo A, Hertel N, Hunt J, et al. ICRP Publication 116: conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures. Ann ICRP. 2010;40:1-257.
  22. Paquet F, Etherington G, Bailey MR, Leggett RW, Lipsztein J, Bolch WE, et al. ICRP Publication 130: occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 1. Ann ICRP. 2015;44:5-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645315577539
  23. Paquet F, Bailey MR, Leggett RW, Lipsztein J, Fell TP, Smith T, et al. ICRP Publication 134: occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 2. Ann ICRP. 2016;45:7-349.
  24. Paquet F, Bailey MR, Leggett RW, Lipsztein J, Marsh J, Fell TP, et al. ICRP Publication 137: occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 3. Ann ICRP. 2017;46:1-486.
  25. Bolch WE, Jokisch D, Zankl M, Eckerman KF, Fell T, Manger R, et al. ICRP Publication 133: the ICRP computational framework for internal dose assessment for reference adults: specific absorbed fractions. Ann ICRP. 2016;45:5-73.
  26. Thierry-Chef I, Marshall M, Fix JJ, Bermann F, Gilbert ES, Hacker C, et al. The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: study of errors in dosimetry. Radiat Res. 2007;167:380-395. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr0552.1
  27. Thierry-Chef I, Richardson DB, Daniels RD, Gillies M, Hamra GB, Haylock R, et al. Dose estimation for a study of nuclear workers in France, the United Kingdom and the United States of America: Methods for the International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS). Radiat Res. 2015;183:632-642. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14006.1
  28. Task Group on Radiation Quality Effects in Radiological Protection, Committee 1 on Radiation Effects, International Commission on Radiological Protection. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (WR): a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2003;33:1-117.
  29. Cullings HM, Grant EJ, Egbert SD, Watanabe T, Oda T, Nakamura F, et al. DS02R1: improvements to atomic bomb survivors' input data and implementation of dosimetry system 2002 (DS02) and resulting changes in estimated doses. Health Phys. 2017;112:56-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000598
  30. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Human alimentary tract model for radiological protection (ICRP Publication 100: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection). Ann ICRP. 2006;36:25-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2006.03.004
  31. Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection: a report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 1994;24:1-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6453(94)90029-9
  32. Eckerman K, Endo A. ICRP Publication 107: nuclear decay data for dosimetric calculations. Ann ICRP. 2008;38:7-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2009.04.003
  33. Individual monitoring for intakes of radionuclides by workers: design and interpretation: a report of a Task Group of Committee 4 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 1988;19:1-315.
  34. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 1991;21:1-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6453(91)90065-O
  35. Satoh D, Takahashi F, Shigemori Y, Sakamoto K. DOSE-Analyzer: a computer program with graphical user interface to analyze absorbed dose inside a body of mouse and human upon external neutron exposure (No. JAEA-DATA/CODE-2010-004). Tokai-mura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2010.