Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

The Korean Association for Radiation Protection (대한방사선방어학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimating Organ Doses from Pediatric Cerebral Computed Tomography Using the WAZA-ARI Web-Based Calculator

  • Etani, Reo (Laboratory of Environmental Health Science, Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences) ;
  • Yoshitake, Takayasu (Graduate School of Nursing, Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences) ;
  • Kai, Michiaki (Laboratory of Environmental Health Science, Oita University of Nursing and Health Sciences)
  • Received : 2020.10.03
  • Accepted : 2020.12.22
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The use of computed tomography (CT) device has increased in the past few decades in Japan. Dose optimization is strongly required in pediatric CT examinations, since there is concern that an unreasonably excessive medical radiation exposure might increase the risk of brain cancer and leukemia. To accelerate the process of dose optimization, continual assessment of the dose levels in actual hospitals and medical facilities is necessary. This study presents organ dose estimation using pediatric cerebral CT scans in the Kyushu region, Japan in 2012 and the web-based calculator, WAZA-ARI (https://waza-ari.nirs.qst.go.jp). Materials and Methods: We collected actual patient information and CT scan parameters from hospitals and medical facilities with more than 200 beds that perform pediatric CT in the Kyushu region, Japan through a questionnaire survey. To estimate the actual organ dose (brain dose, bone marrow dose, thyroid dose, lens dose), we divided the pediatric population into five age groups (0, 1, 5, 10, 15) based on body size, and inputted CT scan parameters into WAZA-ARI. Results and Discussion: Organ doses for each age group were obtained using WAZA-ARI. The brain dose, thyroid dose, and lens dose were the highest in the Age 0 group among the age groups, and the bone marrow and thyroid doses tended to decrease with increasing age groups. All organ doses showed differences among facilities, and this tendency was remarkable in the young group, especially in the Age 0 group. This study confirmed a difference of more than 10-fold in organ doses depending on the facility and CT scan parameters, even when the same CT device was used in the same age group. Conclusion: This study indicated that organ doses varied widely by age group, and also suggested that CT scan parameters are not optimized for children in some hospitals and medical facilities.

Keywords

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-2284. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072149
  2. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
  3. Nikkila A, Raitanen J, Lohi O, Auvinen A. Radiation exposure from computerized tomography and risk of childhood leukemia: Finnish register-based case-control study of childhood leukemia (FRECCLE). Haematologica. 2018;103:1873-1880. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.187716
  4. Nikkila A, Raitanen J, Lohi O, Auvinen A. Radiation exposure from computerized tomography and risk of childhood leukemia: Finnish register-based case-control study of childhood leukemia (FRECCLE). Haematologica. 2020;105:849-850. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.245704
  5. Meulepas JM, Ronckers CM, Smets AM, Nievelstein RA, Gradowska P, Lee C, et al. Radiation exposure from pediatric CT scans and subsequent cancer risk in the Netherlands. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111:256-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy104
  6. Huang R, Liu X, He L, Zhou PK. Radiation exposure associated with computed tomography in childhood and the subsequent risk of cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Dose Response. 2020;18:1559325820923828.
  7. Lee C, Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Harbron RW, Little MP, McHugh K, et al. Reduction in radiation doses from paediatric CT scans in Great Britain. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150305.
  8. Pace E, Borg M. Optimisation of a paediatric CT brain protocol: a figure-of-merit approach. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018;182: 394-404.
  9. Strauss KJ, Somasundaram E, Sengupta D, Marin JR, Brady SL. Radiation dose for pediatric CT: comparison of pediatric versus adult imaging facilities. Radiology. 2019;291:158-167. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019181753
  10. Smith-Bindman R, Wang Y, Chu P, Chung R, Einstein AJ, Balcombe J, et al. International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2019;364:k4931.
  11. Muhogora WE, Ahmed NA, Alsuwaidi JS, Beganovic A, CirajBjelac O, Gershan V, et al. Paediatric CT examinations in 19 developing countries: frequency and radiation dose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;140:49-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq015
  12. Takahashi F, Sato K, Endo A, Ono K, Yoshitake T, Hasegawa T, et al. WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations. I: Radiation transport calculation for organ and tissue doses evaluation using JM phantom. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;146:241-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr160
  13. Ban N, Takahashi F, Ono K, Hasegawa T, Yoshitake T, Katsunuma Y, et al. WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations. II: Development of web-based system. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;146:244-247. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr161
  14. Ban N, Takahashi F, Sato K, Endo A, Ono K, Hasegawa T, et al. Development of a web-based CT dose calculator: WAZA-ARI. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;147:333-337. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr333
  15. Koba Y. Summary of the dose assessment tool for diagnostic X-ray CT, WAZA-ARIv2. Hoshasen Seibutsu Kenkyu. 2016;51:141-154.
  16. The Radiation Imaging Section of the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology. Standardization in X-Ray CT imaging: GALACTIC. 2nd ed. Tokyo, Japan: Ohmsha; 2019.
  17. Mazonakis M, Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N. Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction? Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1352-1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0417-9
  18. Kamei O, Ojima M, Yoshitake T, Ono K, Nishijima K, Kai M. Calculating patient-specific organ doses from adult body CT scans by Monte Carlo analysis using male-individual voxel phantoms. Health Phys. 2015;108:44-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000170
  19. Bolch WE, Eckerman K, Endo A, Hunt JG, Jokisch DW, Kim CH, et al. ICRP Publication 143: Paediatric reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2020;49:5-297.
  20. Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposures. National diagnostic reference levels in Japan [Internet]. Kyoto, Japan: Japanese Society of Radiological Technology; 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Available from: http://www.radher.jp/J-RIME/report/DRL2020_Engver.pdf.
  21. Matsubara K, Matsunaga Y, Yanagawa N, Muramatsu Y, Ida Y, Suzuki S, et al. [Survey of recognition, utilization, and evaluation for diagnostic reference levels in the field of X-ray computed tomography]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2018;74:700-707. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2018_JSRT_74.7.700
  22. Ideguchi R, Yoshida K, Ohtsuru A, Takamura N, Tsuchida T, Kimura H, et al. The present state of radiation exposure from pediatric CT examinations in Japan-what do we have to do? J Radiat Res. 2018;59(suppl_2):ii130-ii136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx095