Journal of Veterinary Science

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.37.1-37.14
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-845X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-555X(eISSN)
대한수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of microbiota diversity of engorged ticks collected from dogs in China

  • Wang, Seongjin (Epidemiological Investigation Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency) ;
  • Hua, Xiuguo (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) ;
  • Cui, Li (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.26
  • 심사 : 2021.04.07
  • 발행 : 2021.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Ticks are one of the most common external parasites in dogs, and are associated with the transmission of a number of major zoonoses, which result in serious harm to human health and even death. Also, the increasing number of pet dogs and pet owners in China has caused concern regarding human tick-borne illnesses. Accordingly, studies are needed to gain a complete understanding of the bacterial composition and diversity of the ticks that parasitize dogs. Objectives: To date, there have been relatively few reports on the analysis of the bacterial community structure and diversity in ticks that parasitize dogs. The objective of this study was to investigate the microbial composition and diversity of parasitic ticks of dogs, and assessed the effect of tick sex and geographical region on the bacterial composition in two tick genera collected from dogs in China. Methods: A total of 178 whole ticks were subjected to a 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) next generation sequencing analysis. The Illumina MiSeq platform targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was used to characterize the bacterial communities of the collected ticks. Sequence analysis and taxonomic assignment were performed using QIIME 2 and the GreenGene database, respectively. After clustering the sequences into taxonomic units, the sequences were quality-filtered and rarefied. Results: After pooling 24 tick samples, we identified a total of 2,081 operational taxonomic units, which were assigned to 23 phyla and 328 genera, revealing a diverse bacterial community profile. The high, moderate and low prevalent taxa include 46, 101, and 182 genera, respectively. Among them, dominant taxa include environmental bacterial genera, such as Psychrobacter and Burkholderia. Additionally, some known tick-associated endosymbionts were also detected, including Coxiella, Rickettsia, and Ricketssiella. Also, the potentially pathogenic genera Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were detected in the tick pools. Moreover, our preliminary study found that the differences in microbial communities are more dependent on the sampling location than tick sex in the tick specimens collected from dogs. Conclusions: The findings of this study support the need for future research on the microbial population present in ticks collected from dogs in China.

키워드

과제정보

We would like to express our gratitude to the following veterinarians for their generous support in the sample collection. Zhuming from the police dog station of Shanghai public security bureau; Pengmenghua from the Nanchang police dog station of the ministry of the public security; Xiufuxiao from the Shenyang police dog station of the ministry of the public security; Taoshunqi from Zhumadian animal disease control center in Henan province; Zhangbin from the Jiangsu animal husbandry and veterinary college; Yudayi from the animal disease control center of Minhang district, Shanghai.

참고문헌

  1. Wang S, Zhao T, Yu X, Lin Z, Hua X, Cui L. Characterization of tick viromes collected from dogs in China. Biosaf Health. 2020;2(2):79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2020.03.002
  2. Zhang J, Liu Q, Wang D, Li W, Beugnet F, Zhou J. Epidemiological survey of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in pet dogs in south-eastern China. Parasite. 2017;24:35. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017036
  3. Jones EH, Hinckley AF, Hook SA, Meek JI, Backenson B, Kugeler KJ, et al. Pet ownership increases human risk of encountering ticks. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65(1):74-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12369
  4. Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Best practices for preventing vector-borne diseases in dogs and humans. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(1):43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.09.004
  5. Chomel B. Tick-borne infections in dogs-an emerging infectious threat. Vet Parasitol. 2011;179(4):294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.03.040
  6. Andersson MO, Tolf C, Tamba P, Stefanache M, Radbea G, Frangoulidis D, et al. Molecular survey of neglected bacterial pathogens reveals an abundant diversity of species and genotypes in ticks collected from animal hosts across Romania. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2756-1
  7. Khoo JJ, Chen F, Kho KL, Ahmad Shanizza AI, Lim FS, Tan KK, et al. Bacterial community in Haemaphysalis ticks of domesticated animals from the Orang Asli communities in Malaysia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7(5):929-937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.04.013
  8. Lalzar I, Harrus S, Mumcuoglu KY, Gottlieb Y. Composition and seasonal variation of Rhipicephalus turanicus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(12):4110-4116. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00323-12
  9. Ravi A, Ereqat S, Al-Jawabreh A, Abdeen Z, Abu Shamma O, Hall H, et al. Metagenomic profiling of ticks: Identification of novel rickettsial genomes and detection of tick-borne canine parvovirus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(1):e0006805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006805
  10. Zhang R, Huang Z, Yu G, Zhang Z. Characterization of microbiota diversity of field-collected Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) with regard to sex and blood meals. J Basic Microbiol. 2019;59(2):215-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800372
  11. Ruiling Z, Zhendong H, Guangfu Y, Zhong Z. Characterization of the bacterial community in Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) throughout developmental stages. Exp Appl Acarol. 2019;77(2):173-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00339-7
  12. Earl JP, Adappa ND, Krol J, Bhat AS, Balashov S, Ehrlich RL, et al. Species-level bacterial community profiling of the healthy sinonasal microbiome using Pacific biosciences sequencing of full-length 16S rRNA genes. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0569-2
  13. Poirier S, Rue O, Peguilhan R, Coeuret G, Zagorec M, Champomier-Verges MC, et al. Deciphering intraspecies bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: a comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204629
  14. Zhang YK, Zhang XY, Liu JZ. Ticks (Acari: Ixodoidea) in China: Geographical distribution, host diversity, and specificity. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2019;102(3):e21544. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21544
  15. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
  16. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(7):5069-5072. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05
  17. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460-2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
  18. R Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Core Team; 2013.
  19. Elbir H, Almathen F, Alhumam NA. A glimpse of the bacteriome of Hyalomma dromedarii ticks infesting camels reveals human Helicobacter pylori pathogen. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019;13(11):1001-1012. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.11604
  20. Rene-Martellet M, Minard G, Massot R, Tran Van V, Valiente Moro C, Chabanne L, et al. Bacterial microbiota associated with Rhipicephalus sanguineus (s.l.) ticks from France, Senegal and Arizona. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):416. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2352-9
  21. Duan D, Cheng T. Determination of the microbial community features of Haemaphysalis flava in different developmental stages by high-throughput sequencing. J Basic Microbiol. 2017;57(4):302-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201600557
  22. Li LH, Zhang Y, Zhu D. Effects of antibiotic treatment on the fecundity of Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides ticks. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2807-7
  23. Vila A, Estrada-Pena A, Altet L, Cusco A, Dandreano S, Francino O, et al. Endosymbionts carried by ticks feeding on dogs in Spain. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019;10(4):848-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.04.003
  24. Mira A, Moran NA. Estimating population size and transmission bottlenecks in maternally transmitted endosymbiotic bacteria. Microb Ecol. 2002;44(2):137-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-0012-9
  25. Gottlieb Y, Lalzar I, Klasson L. Distinctive genome reduction rates revealed by genomic analyses of two coxiella-like endosymbionts in ticks. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(6):1779-1796. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv108
  26. Smith TA, Driscoll T, Gillespie JJ, Raghavan R. A Coxiella-like endosymbiont is a potential vitamin source for the Lone Star tick. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(3):831-838. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv016
  27. Kageyama D, Narita S, Watanabe M. Insect sex determination manipulated by their endosymbionts: incidences, mechanisms and implications. Insects. 2012;3(1):161-199. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3010161
  28. Hunter DJ, Torkelson JL, Bodnar J, Mortazavi B, Laurent T, Deason J, et al. The rickettsia endosymbiont of ixodes pacificus contains all the genes of de novo folate biosynthesis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144552
  29. Greay TL, Gofton AW, Paparini A, Ryan UM, Oskam CL, Irwin PJ. Recent insights into the tick microbiome gained through next-generation sequencing. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2550-5
  30. Cusco A, Sanchez A, Altet L, Ferrer L, Francino O. Individual signatures define canine skin microbiota composition and variability. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00006
  31. Chermprapai S, Ederveen TH, Broere F, Broens EM, Schlotter YM, van Schalkwijk S, et al. The bacterial and fungal microbiome of the skin of healthy dogs and dogs with atopic dermatitis and the impact of topical antimicrobial therapy, an exploratory study. Vet Microbiol. 2019;229:90-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.12.022
  32. Rodrigues Hoffmann A, Patterson AP, Diesel A, Lawhon SD, Ly HJ, Elkins Stephenson C, et al. The skin microbiome in healthy and allergic dogs. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e83197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083197
  33. Bonwitt J, Tran M, Droz A, Gonzalez A, Glover WA. Psychrobacter sanguinis wound infection associated with marine environment exposure, Washington, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(10):1942-1944. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2410.171821
  34. Meason-Smith C, Older CE, Ocana R, Dominguez B, Lawhon SD, Wu J, et al. Novel association of Psychrobacter and Pseudomonas with malodour in bloodhound dogs, and the effects of a topical product composed of essential oils and plant-derived essential fatty acids in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study. Vet Dermatol. 2018;29(6):465-e158. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12689
  35. Weese JS. The canine and feline skin microbiome in health and disease. Vet Dermatol. 2013;24(1):137-145.e31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01076.x
  36. He XM, Cheng TY. Tick saliva microbiomes isolated from engorged and partially fed adults of Haemaphysalis flava tick females. J Appl Entomol. 2018;142(1-2):173-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12427
  37. Fastres A, Roels E, Vangrinsven E, Taminiau B, Jabri H, Bolen G, et al. Assessment of the lung microbiota in dogs: influence of the type of breed, living conditions and canine idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01784-w
  38. Muturi EJ, Dunlap C, Ramirez JL, Rooney AP, Kim CH. Host blood-meal source has a strong impact on gut microbiota of Aedes aegypti. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2019;95(1):1-9.
  39. Zhang XC, Yang ZN, Lu B, Ma XF, Zhang CX, Xu HJ. The composition and transmission of microbiome in hard tick, Ixodes persulcatus, during blood meal. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5(6):864-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.07.009