Korean Journal of Audiology (대한청각학회지)

The Korean Audiology Society (대한청각학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Can Narrow Band Chirp Stimulus Shake the Throne of 500 Hz Tone Burst Stimulus for Cervical Vestibular Myogenic Potentials?

  • Ocal, F Ceyda Akin (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Traning and Research Hospital) ;
  • Karacayli, Ceren (Department of Audiology, University of Health Sciences) ;
  • Coban, Volkan Kenan (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Traning and Research Hospital) ;
  • Satar, Bulent (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Medical School)
  • Received : 2020.09.14
  • Accepted : 2020.12.24
  • Published : 2021.04.20
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare effects of tone-burst (TB) and narrow-band (NB) Claus Elberling (CE)-chirp stimuli on amplitude, latency and interaural asymmetry ratio (IAR) of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) in healthy individuals. Subjects and Methods: The study included 50 healthy volunteers. cVEMP procedure was carried out using 500 Hz TB and NB-CE-chirp stimulus (360-720 Hz, up-chirp) in random order. cVEMP were recorded at 100 dB nHL. For each ear and each stimulus, P1 latency, N1 latency and P1N1 amplitude were measured. IAR was also calculated. Results: Mean age was 26.66±9.48 years. cVEMP's in response to both TB and NB CE-chirp stimuli were obtained in all subjects. No statistically significant difference in P1 latency, N1 latency, and P1N1 amplitude was found between the right and left ears for both TB and NB CE-chirp stimuli (p>0.05). In both sides, P1 and N1 latencies were significantly shorter in NB CE-chirp stimulation compared to TB stimulation (p=0.000). In both sides, no statistically significant difference was found in P1N1 amplitude between two types of stimuli (p>0.05). Conclusions: The chirp stimulus produces robust but earlier cVEMP than TB does. This largest series study on NB chirp cVEMP shows that NB chirp is a good and new reliable alternative.

Keywords

References

  1. Fife TD, Colebatch JG, Kerber KA, Brantberg K, Strupp M, Lee H, et al. Practice guideline: cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2017;89:2288-96. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004690
  2. Wu HJ, Shiao AS, Yang YL, Lee GS. Comparison of short tone burst-evoked and click-evoked vestibular myogenic potentials in healthy individuals. J Chin Med Assoc 2007;70:159-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70350-8
  3. Cheng PW, Huang TW, Young YH. The influence of clicks versus short tone bursts on the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Ear Hear 2003;24:195-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000069225.80220.CB
  4. Rauch SD. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14:299-304. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.moo.0000244185.65022.01
  5. Isaradisaikul S, Navacharoen N, Hanprasertpong C, Kangsanarak J. Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials: norms and protocols. Int J Otolaryngol 2012;2012:913515. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/913515
  6. Papathanasiou ES, Murofushi T, Akin FW, Colebatch JG. International guidelines for the clinical application of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: an expert consensus report. Clin Neurophysiol 2014;125:658-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.042
  7. Meyer N, Vinck B, Heinze B. cVEMPs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Audiol 2015;54:143-51. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.971468
  8. Walther LE, Cebulla M. Band limited chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:2983-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3888-y
  9. Bargen GA. Chirp-evoked auditory brainstem response in children: a review. Am J Audiol 2015;24:573-83. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0016
  10. Wang BC, Liang Y, Liu XL, Zhao J, Liu YL, Li YF, et al. Comparison of chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:3139-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2724-5
  11. Ozgur A, Celebi Erdivanli O, Ozergin Coskun Z, Terzi S, Yigit E, Demirci M, et al. Comparison of tone burst, click and chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in healthy people. J Int Adv Otol 2015;11:33-5. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2015.927
  12. Zakaria MN, Zainun Z, Cheu Lih A. Considerations when analyzing vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) outcomes elicited by chirp stimulus in healthy participants. J Int Adv Otol 2015;11:271-2. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2015.1703
  13. Cebulla M, Walther LE. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials via air conduction delivered by either sequentially or quasisimultaneously presented narrow-band chirp stimuli. Int J Audiol 2019;58:174-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1534280
  14. Murofushi T, Tsubota M, Tsuda Y, Yoshimura E. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential with chirp sounds. J Vestib Res 2020;30:153-8. https://doi.org/10.3233/ves-200704
  15. Akin FW, Murnane OD, Proffitt TM. The effects of click and toneburst stimulus parameters on the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP). J Am Acad Audiol 2003;14:500-9. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.14.9.5
  16. Curthoys IS. A critical review of the neurophysiological evidence underlying clinical vestibular testing using sound, vibration and galvanic stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:132-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.027
  17. Elberling C, Callo J, Don M. Evaluating auditory brainstem responses to different chirp stimuli at three levels of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;128:215-23. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3397640
  18. Atcherson SR, Moore PC. Are chirps better than clicks and tone-bursts for evoking middle latency responses? J Am Acad Audiol 2014;25:576-83. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.25.6.7
  19. Rodrigues GR, Ramos N, Lewis DR. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:1555-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.003
  20. Ferm I, Lightfoot G, Stevens J. Comparison of ABR response amplitude, test time, and estimation of hearing threshold using frequency specific chirp and tone pip stimuli in newborns. Int J Audiol 2013;52:419-23. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.769280
  21. Elberling C, Don M, Cebulla M, Sturzebecher E. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;122:2772-85. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2783985
  22. Maheu M, Alvarado-Umanzor JM, Delcenserie A, Champoux F. The clinical utility of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in the diagnosis of Meniere's disease. Front Neurol 2017;8:415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00415