DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Deterioration Propagation Life of Steel Bridge Paints According to Surface Treatment Methods and Heavy-Duty Painting Types

표면처리방법에 따른 강교용 일반중방식도장계의 열화진행수명 평가

  • 김기혁 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 정영수 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 안진희 (경남과학기술대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 김인태 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2020.12.31
  • Accepted : 2021.01.19
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

In this study, to evaluate deterioration propagation life and deterioration curve of the shop painted and field re-painted steel bridges, accelerated corrosion tests were carried out on 4 types of heavy-duty painting systems with different surface treatments. The surface treatments prior to painting were examined by hand tool(SSPC SP-2), power tool(SP-3,) or blast cleaning(SP-10) considering shop painting and field re-painting. The paint deterioration curves for each painting system and surface treatment were evaluated based on corrosion propagation from the initial paint defects. From the test results, the paint deterioration life of shop painted and field re-painted system was evaluated and compared by using corrosivity categories and durability performance evaluation of structural steel. The deterioration propagation life of shop and field paint was estimated in 18 to 21 years and 5.3 to 8.0 years with atmospheric corrosion category C4.

본 연구에서는 강교량용 일반중방식 도장계열의 신설 도장계 및 재도장계의 내구수명 예측과 도막 열화곡선을 검토하기 위하여 표면처리방법과 도장 종류를 변수로 총 12종류의 도장 시험편에 대하여 실내 부식촉진시험을 실시하였다. 표면처리는 신설(공장도장)과 재도장(현장도장)에 따라 수공구 (SSPC SP-2), 동력공구 (SP-3), 블라스트 처리(SP-10)를 적용하였다. 도장 시험편은 ISO 20340 부식환경 조건에서 실시하였으며, 각 도장계별 열화곡선은 초기결함으로부터 발생된 부풂 및 녹 면적을 기준으로 평가되었다. 또한 대기 부식성 범주와 강재 내구 성능평가 기준을 이용하여 신설 및 보수 도장계의 내구수명을 실험적으로 평가하였다. 그 결과 표면처리 방법에 따른 신설 도장계와 재도장계의 내구수명을 정량적으로 평가하였으며, 대기부식성 등급 C4에서 일반중방식 신설 도장계의 내구수명은 18 ~ 21년, 재도장계는 5.3 ~ 8.0년으로 추정된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, C. Y., Park H. S., and Soe, J. W. (2013), Establishment of guidelines for maintenance coatings of steel bridge, Magazine of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 17(2), 29-35.
  2. Park, C. G., Lee, I, K., and Kim, K. M. (2015), Prediction model for long-term maintenance costs of highway bridge, Expressway & Transportation Research Institute.
  3. Lee, C. Y., and Chang, T. S. (2016), Service life prediction for steel bridge coatings with type of coating systems, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, 28(5), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2016.28.5.325
  4. Jeong, Y. S., Kim, M. J., Jeon, S. H., Ahn, J. H., and Kim, I. T. (2019), Suggestion of deterioration curve for new-type coating on atmospheric environment by acceleration corrosion test, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 23(2), 75-83.
  5. KCS 14 31 40 (2016), Coating, Korean Construction Specification.
  6. ISO 12944 (2018), Paints and varnishes - Corrosion protection of steel structures by protective paint systems, International organization for Standardization.
  7. ISO 20340 (2009), Paints and varnishes - Performance requirements for protective paint systems for offshore and related structures, International organization for Standardization.
  8. Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)(1997), FHWA Study tour for bridge maintenance coatings.
  9. Fujiwara, H., and Miyake, M. (2002), Quantitative Analysis on Deterioration and Remaining Life of Steel Bridge Painting based on Field Data, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 696, 111-123.
  10. Lee, C.Y., Cheong, H.M., and Chang, T.S. (2015), A Study on Application of High Performance Coatings for Service Life Extension of Steel Bridge Coatings, 2015-46-534.9607, Final Report, Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute.
  11. Cheong, H.M., and Lee, C.Y. (2002), Environmentally Friendly Maintenance Coating of Steel Bridge, Final Report, Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute.