DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Directions of mandibular canal displacement in ameloblastoma: A computed tomography mirrored-method analysis

  • 투고 : 2020.05.27
  • 심사 : 2020.09.09
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31

초록

Purpose: This study was performed to investigate mandibular canal displacement in patients with ameloblastoma using a 3-dimensional mirrored-model analysis. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of computed tomographic scans of patients with ameloblastoma (n=10) and healthy controls (n=20). The amount of mandibular canal asymmetry was recorded as a continuous variable, while the buccolingual (yaw) and supero-inferior (pitch) directions of displacement were classified as categorical variables. The t-test for independent samples and the Fisher exact test were used to compare groups in terms of differences between sides and the presence of asymmetric inclinations, respectively (P<0.05). Results: The length of the mandibular canal was similar on both sides in both groups. The ameloblastoma group presented more lateral (2.40±4.16 mm) and inferior (-1.97±1.92 mm) positions of the mental foramen, and a more buccal (1.09±2.75 mm) position of the middle canal point on the lesion side. Displacement of the mandibular canal tended to be found in the anterior region in patients with ameloblastoma, occurring toward the buccal and inferior directions in 60% and 70% of ameloblastoma patients, respectively. Conclusion: Mandibular canal displacement due to ameloblastoma could be detected by this superimposed mirrored method, and displacement was more prevalent toward the inferior and buccal directions. This displacement affected the mental foramen position, but did not lead to a change in the length of the mandibular canal. The control group presented no mandibular canal displacement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. El-Naggar AK, Chan JK, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ. WHO classification of head and neck tumours. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017. p. 215-7.
  2. Becelli R, Carboni A, Cerulli G, Perugini M, Iannetti G. Mandibular ameloblastoma: analysis of surgical treatment carried out in 60 patients between 1977 and 1998. J Craniofac Surg 2002; 13: 395-400. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200205000-00006
  3. Nakamura N, Mitsuyasu T, Higuchi Y, Sandra F, Ohishi M. Growth characteristics of ameloblastoma involving the inferior alveolar nerve: a clinical and histopathologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91: 557-62. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.113110
  4. Effiom OA, Ogundana OM, Akinshipo AO, Akintoye SO. Ameloblastoma: current etiopathological concepts and management. Oral Dis 2018; 24: 307-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12646
  5. Abdi I, Taheri Talesh K, Yazdani J, Keshavarz Meshkin Fam S, Ghavimi MA, Arta AS. The effect of ameloblastoma and keratocystic odontogenic tumor on the displacement pattern of inferior alveolar canal in CBCT examinations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2016; 10: 155-61. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.025
  6. Kolokythas A, Al-Ghamia H, Miloro M. Does a difference exist in inferior alveolar canal displacement caused by commonly encountered pathologic entities? An observational study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 1944-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.016
  7. Mortazavi H, Baharvand M, Safi Y, Dalaie K, Behnaz M, Safari F. Common conditions associated with mandibular canal widening: a literature review. Imaging Sci Dent 2019; 49: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.2.87
  8. Iwanaga J, Mikushi S, Tohara H. Oral cavity and pharynx. In: Watanabe K, Shoja MM, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. Anatomy for plastic surgery of the face, head, and neck. New York: Thieme; 2016. p. 183-200.
  9. AlHadidi A, Cevidanes LH, Mol A, Ludlow J, Styner M. Comparison of two methods for quantitative assessment of mandibular asymmetry using cone beam computed tomography image volumes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 351-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13993523
  10. Cevidanes LH, Alhadidi A, Paniagua B, Styner M, Ludlow J, Mol A, et al. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: 75770.
  11. Thiesen G, Griebel BF, Freitas MP, Oliver DR, Kim KB. Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. Angle Orthod 2018; 88: 545-51. https://doi.org/10.2319/111517-785.1
  12. Ruellas AC, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Gomes MR, Danesi C, Lione R, Nguyen T, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 149: 533-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.026
  13. Reichart PA, Philipsen HP, Sonner S. Ameloblastoma: biological profile of 3677 cases. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1995; 31B: 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-1955(94)00037-5
  14. Sehdev MK, Huvos AG, Strong EW, Gerold FP, Willis GW. Proceedings: ameloblastoma of maxilla and mandible. Cancer 1974; 33: 324-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197402)33:2<324::AID-CNCR2820330205>3.0.CO;2-U
  15. Ghandhi D, Ayoub AF, Pogrel MA, MacDonald G, Brocklebank LM, Moos KF. Ameloblastoma: a surgeon's Dilemma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 1010-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.022
  16. Sham E, Leong J, Maher R, Schenberg M, Leung M, Mansour AK. Mandibular ameloblastoma: clinical experience and literature review. ANZ J Surg 2009; 79: 739-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05061.x
  17. Black CC, Addante RR, Mohila CA. Intraosseous ameloblastoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 585-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.02.040
  18. Hendra FN, Van Cann EM, Helder MN, Ruslin M, de Visscher JG, Forouzanfar T, et al. Global incidence and profile of ameloblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Dis 2020; 26: 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13031
  19. Huang IY, Lai ST, Chen CH, Chen CM, Wu CW, Shen YH. Surgical management of ameloblastoma in children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104: 478-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.033