DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비즈니스 시뮬레이션으로 살펴본 스마트워크의 확산 기간과 생산성 연구

The Diffusion Period and Productivity of Smartwork by Business Simulation

  • 정병호 (인하대학교 산업경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.23
  • 심사 : 2021.02.26
  • 발행 : 2021.03.30

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the diffusion period and productivity of smartwork in an organization. Firms are increasingly interested in smartwork for non contact work and working from home because of the corona 19. The smartwork is a new technology that changes face-to-face work in an organization. It helps the work of individuals and organizations regardless of time and place. The theoretical background describes the complexity, system thinking, diffusion theory, smart work, organizational resistance, and productivity. This study analyzes the diffusion period and productivity of smart work through business simulation techniques. A simulation study progresses four stages. There are problem definition, hypothesis establishment and causal loop diagram, model construction and verification, and policy evaluation. The simulation models contain an individual's resistance variables organizational investment and leadership variables related to the operation of smartwork. The organizational investment variables include organizational culture, legal system, implement systems and technology investment. The individual resistance variables include cognitive, attitude, structure and technological resistance. The leadership includes leadership interest variables and performance linkage variables. The simulation executed the changes of a people number adopting smart work and the organizational productivity monthly. As a result of the simulation, many organization members have accepted the smart work innovation after 20 months. The organizational productivity through smart work showed very high value after 16 months. In scenario analysis, the individuals' awareness and attitude resistance showed very important variables to productivity and a personal change of smart work adoption. Meanwhile, The organizational investment showed that the high driving-force increased not productivity and the low driving-force showed decreased low productivity. Also, leadership variables showed a powerful driver for changing smart work productivity. The implication of the study has suggested extending complexity, diffusion theory and organization resistance theory based on simulation methods.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 정병호, "스마트워크 투자에 따른 직무 생산성에 관한 연구 : 조직 변화저항과 의사소통을 중심으로," 경영과 정보연구, 제37권, 제3호, 2018, pp. 83-113.
  2. 정병호, "스마트워크 활용 수준에 따른 조직성과 강화에 관한 연구," 디지털정보산업학회지, 제14권, 제4호, 2018, pp.189-204.
  3. 윤영수.채승병, 복잡계 개론, 삼성경제연구소, 2005.
  4. Simon, Herbert A. "Near decomposability and complexity: How a mind resides in a brain," SANTA FE INSTITUTE STUDIES IN THE SCIENCES OF COMPLEXITY-PROCEEDINGS VOLUME, Vol. 22, ADDISON-WESLEY PUBLISHING CO, 1995.
  5. Singer, J. L., "Mental processes and brain architecture: confronting the complex adaptive systems of human thought," In SANTA FE INSTITUTE STUDIES IN THE SCIENCES OF COMPLEXITY-PROCEEDINGS VOLUME, Vol. 22, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1995.
  6. 김도훈.문태훈.김동환, 시스템 다이내믹스, 서울: 대영문화사, 1999.
  7. Richmond, B., The "thinking" in systems thinking: Seven essential skills., Pegasus Communications, 2000.
  8. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations (5th edition), NY:Free Press, 2003.
  9. Rogers, E.M., "The 'critical mass' in the diffusion of interactive technologies in organizations, The information systems research challenge: survey research methods," Harvard Business School Press, Vol. 3, 1991, pp.245-263.
  10. Kaminski, J., "Diffusion of innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics," Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011, pp.1-6.
  11. 신철우.박하진.장수덕.최병우, 조직행동론, 문영사, 2002.
  12. Robbins, S. P. and Judge, T. A., Organizational behavior, pearson, 2013.
  13. Schwab, K., The fourth industrial revolution., 2017.
  14. S. Klaus, The 4th industrial revolution World Economic Forum, New York: Crown Business, 2016.
  15. Laudon, K. C. and Laudon, J. P., Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm, Global Edition. Pearson., 2017.
  16. 곽상만, 시스템 다이내믹스 모델링과 시뮬레이션: Vensim의 활용, 북코리아, 2016.
  17. 김동환, "인과지도의 시뮬레이션 방법론: NUMBER," 한국시스템다이내믹스학회 학술발표논문집, 2000, pp.39-60.
  18. 김기찬.정관용.최진.김희숙.김성원, Vensim을 활용한 System Dynamics, 서울: 서울경제경영출판사, 2014.
  19. Sterman, J. D., "Testing behavioral simulation models by direct experiment," Management Science, Vol.33, No.12, 1987, pp.1572-1592. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.12.1572
  20. 정병호.주형근, "인공지능 기술 위험관리에 따른 과학기술 정책과 활용 불안감," e-Business Studies, 제21권, 제3호, 2020, pp.91-104. https://doi.org/10.20462/TeBS.2020.06.21.3.91
  21. 정병호.주형근, "조직 내 4차 산업혁명의 기술적용에 관한 연구," 디지털정보산업학회지, 제16권, 제4호, 2020, pp.95-110.