한국항공우주학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences)

  • 제49권4호
  • /
  • Pages.343-354
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-1348(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6871(eISSN)
한국항공우주학회 (The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

우주분야 공공민간협력을 위한 정책수단과 운영사례 연구

Policy Instruments for Public Private Partnership and Lessons from Case Study in Space

  • Shin, Sangwoo (Space Policy Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Eunjeong (Space Policy Team, Korea Aerospace Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2020.09.29
  • 심사 : 2021.02.23
  • 발행 : 2021.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

공공민간협력(Public-Private Partnerships)은 공공부문과 민간부문의 협력적 관계를 통해 공동의 목표를 달성하는 운영방식이다. 최근 우주분야에서 공공민간협력이 중요해짐에도 불구하고 민간부문과 공공부문 간 협력적 네트워크를 활성화 시키는 정책수단에 관한 연구는 부족했다. 이 연구는 선진국에서 사용 중인 16가지 정책수단을 4가지(구매계약, 재정지원, 연구개발지원, 자원지원)로 유형화하였다. 그리고 미국, 유럽, 일본 등 5가지 공공민간협력 운영사례 연구를 통해 우주산업 경쟁력 강화에 도움이 되는 정책적 시사점을 발굴하였다.

The purpose of this study is to contribute to an understanding of the policy instruments used by the public sector to ensure cooperation with the private sector in the delivery of space policy. Despite the importance of public and private partnership in recent years, there has been a lack of research on policy instruments. This study categorized 16 policy instruments into 4 types: purchase contracts, capital subsidies, research and development support and input subsidies. In addition, 5 cases of public private partnership in the United State, Europe and Japan were studied to explore policy implications to strength industrial competition.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT, Space Industry Strategy, 2018.
  2. Harris, S., Public-Private Partnerships: Delivering Better Infrastructure Services, International Financial Services, London, 2004.
  3. NASA Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate Chief Knowledge Officer, Lessons Learned Report of Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS), April 2017.
  4. OECD, Ch. 3, Institutions and Policies Conductive to Space Innovation, Space and Innovation, 2016 pp. 58-86.
  5. Khanom, N. A., "Conceptual Issues in Defining Public Private Partnerships (PPPs)," International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 6, No. 2, July 2010, pp. 150-163.
  6. OECD, Ch. 3. Public/Private Partnerships for Innovations, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2004, 2004, pp. 87-111.
  7. Chun, Y. H. and Lee, K. L., Research on Policy Instruments: Origin, Development, and Future, Hengjungnonchong, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2010, pp. 91-118.
  8. Salamon, L. M. (ed.), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  9. Crane, K. W., Linck, E., Carioscia, S. A. and Lal, B., "Assessment of the Utility of a Government Strategic Investment Fund for Space," IDA Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2019.
  10. https://alexsli.com/thespacebar/2020/2/25/cost-plus-contracts-in-a-new-space-age
  11. NASA, Fiscal Year 2018 Annual Procurement Report. 2018.
  12. NASA Office of Inspector General, NASA's Engineering and Technical Services Contracts, 2019.
  13. https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-selects-early-stage-technology-concepts-for-new-continued-study
  14. Federal Aviation Administration(FAA), State Support for Commercial Space Activities, https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/State%20Support%20for%20Commercial%20Space%20Activities.pdf
  15. NearEarth, Supporting Commercial Space Development, 2010.
  16. NASA SBIR homepage, https://sbir.nasa.gov/content/nasa-sbirsttr-basics
  17. NASA, NASA Advisory Implementing Instruction, Space Act Agreements Guide, 2014.
  18. https://www.nasa.gov/lunarcatalyst
  19. Federal Acquisition Regulation, PART 35, Research and Development Contracting, https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-35
  20. NASA, Grant and Cooperative Agreement Manual, 2014 (2020 revised).
  21. Hashimoto, M., Public-Private Partnerships in Space Projects: An Analysis of Stakeholder Dynamics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009.
  22. McCall, S. M., National Security Space Launch, Congressional Research Service, 2020.
  23. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle: Introducing Competition into NSS Launch Acquisition, U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Defense, GAS14-259T, March 5, 2014, p. 2.
  24. Money, S., Competition and EELV: Challenges and Opportunities in New Launch Vehicle Acquisition, Pt. 1, Future In-Space Operations Presentation, May 9, 2012, p. 16.
  25. The White House, U.S. Space Transportation Policy, NSPD-40, Washington, DC, January 6, 2005.
  26. Homeland Security Digital Library, National Security Space Launch Programs, U.S, Senate Committee on Appropriations, March 5, 2014.
  27. European Commission, Galileo, COM (54), Brussels: EC, 1999.
  28. Barensky, S., "Galileo Public-private Partnership Crashes to Earth," Politico, May 9, 2007.
  29. Bertrán, X. and Vidal, A., "The Implementation of a Public-Private Partnership for Galileo," Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2005), Long Beach, CA, September 2005, pp. 390-399.
  30. European Commission, Green Paper on public-private partnerships and community law on public contracts and concessions, COM (327), Brussels: EC, 2004.
  31. Zervos, V. and Siegel, D. S., "Technology, security, and policy implications of future transatlantic partnerships in space: Lessons from Galileo," Research Policy, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1630-1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.008
  32. Morth, U., "Public and Private Partnerships as Dilemmas between Efficiency and Democratic Accountability: The Case of Galileo," Journal of European Integration, Vol. 29, Issue 5, 2007, pp. 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701694907
  33. Killemaes, E. "Study of Public-Private Partnerships in the European Space Industry," Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, and Universiteit Gent, 2012.
  34. Iron, D. and Davidian, K., "Applying the UK's PPP Lessons to NASA's Commercial Development Policy," AIAA SPACE 2008 Conference & Exposition, 9 September 2008.
  35. Werninghaus, R. and Buckreuss, S., "The TerraSAR-X Mission and System Design," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2010 pp. 606-614. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2031062
  36. Spude, M. and Grimard, M., "The Astrium experience-a large space system prime contractor point of view towards PPP space projects," International Astronautical Congress 2008, Glasgow, Scotland, 2008.
  37. Taki, I., Akira, S. and Kenji. K., "Development of the GX Launch Vehicle, New Medium Class Launch Vehicle of Japan," Journal of IHI Technologies, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2009, pp. 172-177.
  38. Sato, K. and Kondou, Y., Overview of GX Launch services by GALEX, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 59, Issues 1-5, July-September 2006, pp. 381-391 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.02.029
  39. Development Bank of Japan, Strengthening the competitiveness of the space industry in Japan, 2017, https://www.dbj.jp/topics/dbj_news/2017/html/0000027278.html
  40. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, GX Rocket, https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/kaihatu/space/kaihatsushi/detail/1299819.htm