DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Distribution Characteristics, Population Structure and Dynamics of the Endangered Plant, Viola websteri Hemsl.

멸종위기야생식물인 왕제비꽃(Viola websteri Hemsl.)의 분포특성과 개체군 구조 및 동태

  • Chae, Hyun-Hee (Department of Biology, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Chul (Research Center for Natural Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kwak, Myoung-Hai (Plants Resource Division, Biological Resources Research Department, National Institute of Biological Resource) ;
  • Nam, Gi-Heum (Plants Resource Division, Biological Resources Research Department, National Institute of Biological Resource)
  • 채현희 (강릉원주대학교 생물학과) ;
  • 김영철 (강릉원주대학교 자연과학연구소) ;
  • 곽명해 (국립생물자원관 식물자원과) ;
  • 남기흠 (국립생물자원관 식물자원과)
  • Received : 2020.10.29
  • Accepted : 2021.01.11
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

Plant species exhibit current characteristics as a result of interactions with environmental conditions. The plants of Viola sp. have selected chasmogamous flowers with vigorous vegetative propagation or development of cleistogamous flowers as an adaptation strategy. Viola websteri is distributed on the Korean peninsula and the eastern part of Jilin Province, China. The center and edge of the distribution are expected to exhibit different population-dynamics. It is necessary to investigate the cause of its current limited distribution even though V. websteri has a mixed-mating strategy. Firstly, We examined the vegetation environment of habitats and evaluated its characteristics. Growth characteristics were examined through plant phenology. We then evaluated the population structure, characteristics of chasmogamous flowers, and productivity of cleistogamous flowers. Moreover, we compared population sizes between 2014 and 2018. Most habitats were located in deciduous broadleaf mixed forests adjacent to valleys. V. websteri produced chasmogamous flowers with self-incompatibility in April-May and cleistogamous flowers in June-September. The cleistogamous flower production is a strategy ensuring seed production under uncertain environmental fluctuations; these were approximately twice as numerous as chasmogamous flowers. The population structure was distinguished into stable and very unstable regions. There were sites where the population experienced a sharp decline in the 2018 compared to that of 2014. This large decline was found in the edge populations. The habitats had different microsites depending on the natural disturbances of drought and the matrix constituting the habitat, thus supporting various plants. Ensuring the production of seeds through cleistogamous flowers, it was determined that rapid seedling re-establishment and population replenishment were possible when the natural disturbance factor was removed. Environmental factors did not equally affect all populations or individuals. Therefore, it was expected that it would be able to persisted in a long time, despite the rapid decrease in the number of individuals in the population regionally. Local extinction and re-establishment are likely to repeat according to environmental change. We propose the additional population investigation based on this works are required. We also suggest a need to assess the long-term population dynamics and the genetic characteristics of chasmogamous flowers and cleistogamous flowers to establish and implement effective conservation strategies.

식물 종은 주어진 환경조건과의 상호작용의 결과로 현재와 같은 특성을 나타낸다. 제비꽃속의 식물은 적응전략으로 개방화와 더불어 왕성한 영양번식체계를 선택하였거나 또는 폐쇄화를 발달시키는 전략을 선택하였다. 왕제비꽃은 제비꽃 속의 식물로 세계적으로 한반도와 중국 지린(길림)성의 동부에만 분포한다. 분포의 중심과 가장자리는 서로 다른 개체군 동태를 나타낼 것으로 예상된다. 왕제비꽃이 복합적인종자생산전략(Mixed-mating strategy)을 소유함에도 현재와 같은 제한적인 분포를 나타내는 원인을 알아볼 필요가 있다. 먼저 우리는 분포지의 식생환경을 조사하여 그 특성을 평가하였다. 식물계절학을 통해 생장특성을 알아보았다. 또한 개체군의 구조, 개방화의 결실특성, 폐쇄화의 생산성을 평가하였다. 그리고 2014년과 2018년 사이의 개체군크기 변화를 비교하였다. 분포지의 대부분은 계곡에 인접한 낙엽활엽수혼효림의 식생하부에 위치하였다. 4~5월에 자가불화합성의 개방화를 생산하였고 6~9월까지 폐쇄화를 생산하였다. 폐쇄화의 생산은 불확실한 환경변화에서 종자의 생산을 보증하기 위한 전략으로 평가되며 개방화에 비해 약 2배의 생산량을 나타내었다. 개체군의 구조는 안정적인 지역과 매우 불안정한 지역이 구분되었다. 2014년에 비해 2018년의 조사에서 개체군의 급격한 감소를 경험한 지역이 존재하였다. 이러한 큰 폭의 감소는 가장자리 개체군에서 크게 나타나는 것으로 평가되었다. 왕제비꽃 분포지는 가뭄이라는 자연적인 교란 요인과 분포지를 구성하는 기질에 따른 다양한 미소입지의 존재로 다양한 식물을 부양하였다. 이러한 불확실한 조건에서 폐쇄화를 통해 종자의 생산을 보증하고 그에 따라 자연적인 교란요인이 제거되었을 때 빠르게 유묘의 재정착과 개체군의 보충이 가능한 것으로 판단되었다. 그리고 환경요인은 모든 개체군 및 개체군 내의 모든 개체에 동일하게 작용하지 않는 것으로 추정되었다. 따라서 지역적으로 급격한 개체수의 감소에도 불구하고 완전한 소멸에 이르지 않을 것이고 환경의 변화에 따라 국지적인 소멸과 재정착이 반복될 것으로 예상되었다. 우리는 본 연구를 통해 수집된 종의 특성에 대한 정보를 바탕으로 추가적인 분포지의 조사가 필요함을 제안하였다. 또한 효과적인 보전 전략의 수립과 시행을 위해서는 보다 장기적인 개체군 동태와 개방화와 폐쇄화의 유전적 특성을 평가하는 것이 필요함을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baskin, J.M. and C.C. Baskin(2017) Seed germination in cleistogamous species: Theoretical considerations and a literature survey of experimental results. Seed Science Research 2: 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258517000058
  2. Braun-Blanquet, J.(1964) Pflanzensoziologie. 3. Springer-Verlag, New York, 865pp.
  3. Bray, R.J. and J.T. Curtis(1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268
  4. Chae, H.H., H.U. Ji, J.H. Min and Y.C. Kim(2017) Report on the monitoring of special protection zone in Odaesan National Park-Iris odaesanensis Y.N. Lee, Paeonia obovata Maxim-. Journal of National Park Research 8: 8-23. (in Korean and English abstract)
  5. Crawley, M.J. and G.J.S. Ross(1990) The population dynamics of plants [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 330: 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0187
  6. Crawley, M.J.(1986) Plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 496pp.
  7. Culley, T.M.(2002) Reproductive biology and delayed selfing in Viola pubescens(Violaceae), an understory herb with chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1086/324180
  8. Dupre, C. and J. Ehrlen(2002) Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. Journal of Ecology 90: 796-805.
  9. Eckert, C.G., K.E. Samis and S.C. Lougheed(2008) Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: The centralmarginal hypothesis and beyond. Molecular Ecology 17: 1170-1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03659.x
  10. Eckstein, R.L. and A. Otte(2005) Effects of cleistogamy and pollen source on seed production and offspring performance in three endangered violets. Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2004.12.002
  11. Elzinga, L., D.W. Salzer and J.W. Willoughby(1998) Measuring & monitering plant populations. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Lincoln, USA, 496pp.
  12. Evju, M., R. Halvorsen, K. Rydgren, G. Austrheim and A. Mysterud(2010) Interaction between local climate and grazing determine the population dynamics of the small herb Viola biflora. Oecologia 163: 921-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1637-x
  13. Flora of China(2020). http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200027868, 2020.1.15.
  14. Garciia, M.B., X. Picoo and J. Ehrleen(2008) Life span correlates with population dynamics in perennial herbaceous plants. American Journal of Botany 95(2): 258-262. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.95.2.258
  15. Grubb, J.P.(1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Review 52: 107-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1977.tb01347.x
  16. Hampe, A. and R.J. Petit(2005) Conservation biodiversity under climate change: The rear edge matters. Ecology Letters 8: 461-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x
  17. Hampe, A.(2011) Plants on the move: The role of seed dispersal and initial population establishment for climate-driven range expansions. Acta Oecologica 37: 666-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.05.001
  18. Hanski, I.(1982) Dynamics of regional distribution: The core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544021
  19. Hanski, I.(1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1038/23876
  20. Harper, J.L.(1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, 892pp.
  21. Hunter Jr, M.L. and J. Gibbs(2011) Fundamentals of conservation biology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 497pp.
  22. Hutchinson, G.E.(1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22: 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039
  23. Jang, S.K., K.S. Cheon, K.A. Kim, J.H. Jang and K.O. Yoo(2010) Ecological characteristics of Viola westeri Hemsley habitats. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 23: 261-273.(in Korean and English abstract)
  24. Kang, J.S., X. Zhang and M.H. Kwak(2017) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Viola websteri (Violaceae) and cross-species amplification within the Genus Viola. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 35: 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-016-1011-1
  25. Kim, Y.C., H.H. Chae, B.R. Hong, H.K. Oh, K.H. Lee and K.S. Lee(2016) The status of endangered plants distributed in the middle eastern area of Korea and evaluation of the risk factors. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 30: 291-307. (in Korean and English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2016.30.3.291
  26. Kim, Y.C., H.H. Chae, G.H. Nam and K.S. Lee(2018) Adapting strategy of biennial endangered Halenia corniculata (L.) Cornaz to environmental stress and its implications for conservation plan. Journal of Plant Biology 61: 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-018-0016-8
  27. Koontz, S.M., C.W. Weekley, S.J. Haller Crate and E.R. Menges(2017) Patterns of chasmogamous and cleistogamous, a mixed-mating strategy in an endangered perennial. AoB PLANTS 6: 1-9.
  28. Korea National Arboretum(KNA)(2012) Rare plants in Korea. Korea National Arboretum, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 412pp.(in Korean)
  29. Korean National Arboretum(KNA) and The Plant Taxonomic Society of Korea(2007) A synonymic list of vascular plants in Korea. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon.
  30. Lammi, A., P. Siikamaki and K. Mustajarvi(1999) Genetic Diversity, Population Size, and Fitness in Central and Peripheral Populations of a Rare Plant Lychnis viscaria. Conservation Biology 13(5): 1069-1078. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98278.x
  31. Leps, J. and P. Silauer(2007) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, New York, 269pp.
  32. Lienert, J.(2004) Habitat fragmentation effects on fitness of plant populations-a review. Journal for Nature Conservation 12(1): 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2003.07.002
  33. Lord, E.M.(1981) Cleistogamy: A tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. The Botanical Review 47: 421-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860538
  34. Mayberry, R.J. and E. Elle(2010) Conservation of a rare plant requires different methods in different habitats: Demographic lessons from Actaea elata. Oecologia 164: 1121-1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1809-8
  35. Mayers, A.M. and E.M. Lord(1983) Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. I. A growth rate study. American Journal of Botany 70: 1548-1555. https://doi.org/10.2307/2443353
  36. Ministry of Environment(MOE)(2012) Law of wild animal and plants protection. Ministry of Environment.
  37. Ministry of Environment(MOE)(2015) Law of wild animal and plants protection. Ministry of Environment.
  38. Moora, M. and U. Jogar(2006) Competitive responses of the rare Viola elatior and common Viola mirabilis. Plant Ecology 184: 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9055-6
  39. Myers, J.A., M. Vellend, S. Gardescu and P.L. Marks(2004) Seed dispresal by white-tailed deer: Implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139: 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1474-2
  40. Nathan, R., M. Schurr, O. Spiegel and O. Steinitz(2008) Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 638-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.08.003
  41. National Institute of Biological Resources(NIBR)(2012) Red data book of endangered vascular plants in Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, 390pp.(in Korean)
  42. National Institute of Biological Resources(NIBR)(2017) An overview of endangered wild organisms. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, 593pp.(in Korean)
  43. Newell, S.J.(1982) Demography of Newfoundland population of three Viola species. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 2581-2591. https://doi.org/10.1139/b83-284
  44. Newell, S.J., O.T. Solbrig and D.T. Kincaid(1981) Studies on the population biology of the Genus Viola: III. The demography of Viola blanda and Viola pallens. Journal of Ecology 69: 997-1016. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259650
  45. Ohkawara, K. and S. Higashi(1994) Relative importance of ballistic and ant dispersal in two diplochorous Viola species(Violaceae). Oecologia 100: 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317140
  46. Pearman, P.B., A. Guisan, O. Broennimann and C.F. Randin(2007) Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends in Plant Science 23: 149-158.
  47. Pearson, G.A., A. Lago-Leston, M. Valente and E.A. Serrao(2009) Frayed at the edges: Selective pressure and adaptive response to abiotic stressors are m ism atched in low diversity edge populations. Journal of Ecology 97: 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01481.x
  48. Pellerin, M., M. Picard, S. Saïid, E. Baubet and C. Baltzinger(2016) Complementary endozoochorous long-distance seed dispersal by three native herbivorous ungulates in Europe. Basic and Applied Ecology 17: 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.01.005
  49. Pfeifer, M., N.G. Passalacqua, S. Bartram, B. Schatz, A. Croce, P.D. Carey, H. Kraudelt and F. Jeltsch(2010) Conservation priorities differ at opposing species borders of a European orchid. Biological Conservation 143: 2207-2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.005
  50. Pianka, E.R.(1970) On r-and K-Selection. The American Naturalist 104: 592-597. https://doi.org/10.1086/282697
  51. Pickett, S.T.A. and J.N. Thompson(1978) Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 13(1): 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(78)90016-2
  52. Pickett, S.T.A.(1980) Non-equilibrium coexistence of plants. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107(2): 238-248. https://doi.org/10.2307/2484227
  53. Ranua, V.A. and C. Weinig(2010) Mixed-mating strategies and their sensitivity to abiotic variation in Viola lanceolata L.(Violaceae). The Open Ecology Journal 3: 83-94. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213001003010083
  54. Raunkiaer, C.(1907) Planterigets Livsformer og deres Betydning for Geografien. Gyldendalske Boghandel-Nordisk Forlag, Kobenhavn and Kristiania, 132pp.
  55. Rejmanek, M., E. Rejmankova and W. Holzner(2004) Species diversity of plant communities on calcareous screes: The role of intermediate disturbance. Preslia 76: 207-222.
  56. Reznick, D., M.J. Bryant and F. Bashey (2002) r- and K-selection revisited: the role of population regulation in life-history evolution. Ecological Society of America 83:1509-1520.
  57. Roxburgh, S.H., K. Shea and J.B. Wilson(2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: Patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85: 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0266
  58. Schellner, R.A., S.J. Newell and O.T. Solbrig(1982) Studies on the population biology of the Genus Viola: IV. Spatial pattern of ramets and seedlings in three stoloniferous species. Journal of Ecology 70: 273-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259878
  59. Song, J.M., G.Y. Lee, N.Y. Kim and J.S. Yi(2010) Vegetation structure and site environment of natural habitat of an endangered plant, Viola westeri. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99: 261-276. (in Korean and English abstract)
  60. Wilkinson, D.M.(1999) The disturbing history of intermediate disturbance. Oikos 84: 145-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546874
  61. Yang, Y.Y. and J.G. Kim(2016) The optimal balance between sexual and asexual reproduction in variable environment: A systematic review. Journal of Ecology and Environment 40: 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-016-0009-9