Geomechanics and Engineering

  • 제24권4호
  • /
  • Pages.323-335
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2005-307X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6219(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of the excavation damage zone in TBM tunnel using large deformation FE analysis

  • Kim, Dohyun (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) ;
  • Jeong, Sangseom (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.25
  • 심사 : 2021.01.28
  • 발행 : 2021.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper aims to estimate the range of the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) formation caused by the tunnel boring machine (TBM) advancement through dynamic three-dimensional large deformation finite element analysis. Large deformation analysis based on Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) analysis is used to accurately simulate the behavior during TBM excavation. The analysis model is verified based on numerous test results reported in the literature. The range of the formed EDZ will be suggested as a boundary under various conditions - different tunnel diameter, tunnel depth, and rock type. Moreover, evaluation of the integrity of the tunnel structure during excavation has been carried out. Based on the numerical results, the apparent boundary of the EDZ is shown to within the range of 0.7D (D: tunnel diameter) around the excavation surface. Through series of numerical computation, it is clear that for the rock of with higher rock mass rating (RMR) grade (close to 1st grade), the EDZ around the tunnel tends to increase. The size of the EDZ is found to be direct proportional to the tunnel diameter, whereas the depth of the tunnel is inversely proportional to the magnitude of the EDZ. However, the relationship between the formation of the EDZ and the stability of the tunnel was not found to be consistent. In case where the TBM excavation is carried out in hard rock or rock under high confinement (excavation under greater depth), large range of the EDZ may be formed, but less strain occurs along the excavation surface during excavation and is found to be more stable.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ABAQUS CAE (2013), ABAQUS User's Manual, Dessault Systemes Simulia Corporation, Rhode Island, U.S.A.
  2. Arson, C. and Gatmiri, B. (2012), "Thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling of damage in unsaturated porous media: Theoretical framework and numerical study of the EDZ", Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 36(3), 272-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1005.
  3. Bathe, K.J. (1996), Finite Element Procedures, Klaus-Jurgen Bathe, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.
  4. Bauer, C., Homand-Etienne, F., Ben Slimane, K., Hinzen, K.G. and Reamer, S.K. (1996), "Damage zone characterization in the near field in the Swedish ZEDEX tunnel using in situ and laboratory measurements", Proceedings of the Eurock '96, Turin, Italy, September.
  5. Belytschko, T., Liu, K. and Moran, B. (2000), Non-linear Finite Element Analysis for Continua and Structures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, U.S.A.
  6. Benson, D.J. and Okazawa, S. (2004), "Contact in a multi-material Eulerian finite element formulation", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 193, 4277-4298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.061.
  7. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1993), Classification of Rock Masses for Engineering: The RMR System and Fracture Trends, in Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Pergamon Press, 553-574.
  8. Blumberg, N.N. and Tamuzh, V.P. (1980), "Edge effects and stress concentrations in multilaminate composite plates", Mech. Compos. Mater., 16(3), 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00608331.
  9. Cai, M. and Kaiser, P.K. (2005), "Assessment of excavation damaged zone using a micromechanics model", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 20(4), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.12.002.
  10. Carbonell, J., Onate, E. and Suarez, B. (2010), "Modeling of ground excavation with the particle finite-element method", J. Eng. Mech., 136(4), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000086.
  11. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Bae, G.J. and Jeon, S. (2006), "Performance prediction of TBM disc cutting on granitic rock by the linear cutting test", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 21(3), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.131.
  12. Chern, J.C., Yu, C.W. and Shiao, F.Y. (1998), "Tunnelling in squeezing ground and support estimation", Proceedings of the Regular Symposium of Sedimentary Rock Engineering, Taipei, Tawian.
  13. Cho, W.J., Jeon, S., Yu, S.H. and Chang, S.H. (2010), "Optimum spacing of TBM disc cutters: A numerical simulation using the three-dimensional dynamic fracturing method", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 25(3), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2009.11.007.
  14. Cundall, P.A., Potyondi, D.O. and Lee, C.A. (1996), "Micromechanics-based models for fracture and breakout around the mine-by tunnel", Proceedings of the Canadian Nuclear Society International Conference on Deep Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste, Winnipeg, Canada, September.
  15. Diederichs, M.S., Kaiser, P.K. and Eberhardt, E. (2004), "Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunneling and the influence of near-face stress rotation", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41, 785-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.003.
  16. Eberhardt, E.D. (1998), "Brittle rock fracture, progressive damage in uniaxial compression", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  17. Eftekhari, A. and Aalianvari, A. (2019), "An overview of several techniques employed to overcome squeezing in mechanized tunnels; A case study", Geomech. Eng., 18(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.18.2.215.
  18. Eitzenberger, A. (2012), "Wave propagation in rock and influence of discontinuities", Ph.D. Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden.
  19. Emsley, S., Olsson, O., Stenberg, L., Alheid, H.J. and Falls, S. (1997), ZEDEX - A Study of Damage and Disturbance from Tunnel Excavation by Blasting and Tunnel Boring, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management CO, Sweden.
  20. Gehring, K.H. (1996), Design criteria for TBM's with Respect to Real Rock Pressure. Tunnel Boring Machines-Trends in Design & Construction of Mechanized Tunneling, International Lecture Series TBM Tunnelling trends, Hagenberg. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 43-53.
  21. Hammerer, N. (2013), "Influence of steering actions by the machine operator on the interpretation of TBM performance data", Research Report, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  22. Hardine, E. (2014), "Review of underground construction methods and opening stability for repositories in clay/shale media", Research Report, Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico, U.S.A.
  23. Harrison, J.P. and Hudson, J.A. (2000), Engineering Rock Mechanics: Part 2: Illustrative Worked Examples, Elsevier.
  24. Hoek, E. and Bieniawski, Z.T. (1965), "Brittle fracture propagation in rock under compression", Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1(3), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186851.
  25. Jeon, Y.J., Jeon, S.C., Jeon, S.J. and Lee, C.J. (2020), "Study on the behaviour of pre-existing single piles to adjacent shield tunnel by considering the changes in the tunnel face pressures and the location of the pile tips", Geomech. Eng., 21(2), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.2.187.
  26. Jeong, S.S., Han, Y.C., Kim, Y.M. and Kim, D.H. (2014), "Evaluation of the NATM tunnel load on concrete lining using the ground lining interaction model", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 18(2), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0597-9.
  27. Jonsson, M., Backstrom, A., Feng, Q., Berglund, J., Johansson, M. and Olsson, M. (2009), "Aspo hard rock laboratory: studies of factors that affect and controls the excavation damage/disturbed zone", SKB Report R-09-17, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management CO, Sweden.
  28. Kim, D.H., Jeong, S.S. and Kim, K.Y. (2015), "FEM based estimation of EDZ under TBM induced vibration", Proceedings of the ITA World Tunnel Congress 2015, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May.
  29. Kim, Y.H. and Jeong, S.S. (2014), "Analysis of dynamically penetrating anchor based on coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) methods", J. Kor. Soc. Civ. Eng., 34(3), 895-906. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.3.0895.
  30. Ko, J.Y. (2015), "Evaluation of bearing capacity for open-ended piles with soil plugging", Ph.D. Dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  31. Kwon, S.K., Lee, C.S., Cho, S.J., Jeon S.W. and Cho, W.J. (2009), "An investigation of the excavation damaged zone at the KAERI underground research tunnel", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 24(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2008.01.004.
  32. Lee, S.Y., Kim, D.H. and Jeong, S.S. (2016), "A study on the excavation damage zone (EDZ) under TBM advancement based on large deformation technique (Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian)", J. Kor. Geotech. Soc., 32(10), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2016.32.12.5.
  33. Martin, C.D. (1989), "Failure observations in situ stress domains at the Underground Research Laboratory", Proceedings of the Conference on Rock Mechanics and Rock Physics at Great Depth, Pau, France, August-September.
  34. Martin, C.D. (1993), "The strength of massive Lac du Bonnet granite around underground openings", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada.
  35. Martin, C.D., Christiansson, R., and Soderhall, J. (2001), "Rock stability considerations for siting and constructing a KBS-3 repository: Based on experiences from Aspo HRL, AECL's URL, Tunneling and mining", Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management CO, Sweden.
  36. Martin, C.D., Read, R.S. and Martino, J.B. (1997), "Observation of brittle failure around a circular test tunnel", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 34(7), 1065-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)90200-8.
  37. Martino, J.B. and Chandler, N.A. (2004), "Excavation-induced damage studies at the Underground Research Laboratory", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41(8), 1413-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.010.
  38. Martino, J.B., Dixon, D.A., Kozak, E.T., Gascoyne, M., Vignal, B., Sugita, Y., Fujita, T. and Masumoto, K. (2007), "The tunnel sealing experiment: An international study of full-scale seals", Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 32(1-7), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.04.023.
  39. Perras, M.A. and Diederichs, M.S. (2016), "Predicting excavation damage zone depths in brittle rocks", J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 8(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.11.004.
  40. Ramoni, M. and Anagnostou, G. (2011), "The interaction between shield, ground and tunnel support in TBM tunnelling through squeezing ground", Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 44(1), 37-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-010-0103-8.
  41. Read, R.S. (2004), "20 years of excavation response studies at AECL's Underground Research Laboratory", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41(8), 1251-1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.012.
  42. Read, R.S., Chandler, N.A. and Dzik, E.J. (1998), "In situ strength criteria for tunnel design in highly-stressed rock masses", Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 35(3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(97)00302-1.
  43. Saiang, D. (2004), "Damaged rock zone around excavation boundaries and its interaction with shotcrete", Licentiate Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
  44. Sakurai, S. (1983), "Displacement measurements associated with the design of underground openings", Proceedings of the International Symposium of Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Zurich, Switzerland, September.
  45. Shen, B., Stepansson, O., Rinne, M., Amemiya, K., Yamashi, R., Toguri, S., and Asano, H. (2011), "FRACOD modeling of rock fracture and permeability change in excavation damaged zones", Int. J. Geomech., 11(4), 302-313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000034.
  46. Shiwa, M. and Kishi, T. (2005), Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology.
  47. Siren, T. (2015), "Excavation damage zones, fracture mechanics simulation and in situ strength of migmatitic gneiss and pegmatitic granite at the nuclear waste disposal site in Olkiluoto", Ph.D. Dissertation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
  48. Skrzat, A. (2012), "Application of coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach in metal forming simulations", Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, 284, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.7862/rm.2012.9.
  49. Stepansson, O., Shen, B., Rinne, M., Amemiya, K., Yamashi, R., and Toguri S. (2008), "FRACOD modeling of rock fracture and permeability change in excavation damaged zones", Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, India, October.
  50. Tho, K.K., Leung, C.F., Chow, Y.K. and Swaddiwedhipong, S. (2012), "Eulerian finite-element technique for analysis of jackup spudcan penetration", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 12(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000111.
  51. Winberg, A. (1997), "The role of the disturbed rock zone in radioactive waste repository safety and performance assessment. A topical discussion and international overview", Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management CO, Sweden.
  52. Xu, H. and Arson, C. (2014), "Anisotropic damage models for geomaterials: Theoretical and numerical challenges", Int. J. Comput. Meth., 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876213420,073.
  53. Zhang, C., Chu, W., Liu, N., Zhu, Y., and Hou, J. (2011), "Laboratory tests and numerical simulations of brittle marble and squeezing shist at Jinping II hydropower station China", J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 3(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1235.2011.00030.
  54. Zhang, Y., Ding, X., Huang, S., Yang, Q., Peng, L. and Li, Y. (2018), "Field measurement and numerical simulation of excavation damage zone in a 2000 m-deep cavern", Geomech. Eng., 16(4), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.16.4.399.
  55. Zhao, K., Janutolo, M. and Barla, G. (2012), "A completely 3D model for the simulation of mechanized tunnel excavation", Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 45(4), 475-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0224-3.

피인용 문헌

  1. Large deformation finite element analyses in TBM tunnel excavation: CEL and auto-remeshing approach vol.116, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104081