DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Skin Irritation and Sensitization on an Acaricide Containing Essential Oils of Chamaecyparis obtusa and Cinnamomum camphora for Control of Poultry Red Mite (Dermanyssus gallinae)

편백정유와 계피정유를 주성분으로 한 닭진드기 살비제에 대한 피부 자극성 및 감작성 평가

  • Song, Jun-Ho (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hwang, Du Hyeon (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Euikyung (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Suk (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Hu-Jang (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 송준호 (경상대학교 수의과대학 동물의학연구소) ;
  • 황두현 (경상대학교 수의과대학 동물의학연구소) ;
  • 김의경 (경상대학교 수의과대학 동물의학연구소) ;
  • 김석 (경상대학교 수의과대학 동물의학연구소) ;
  • 이후장 (경상대학교 수의과대학 동물의학연구소)
  • Received : 2020.10.23
  • Accepted : 2020.12.16
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

This evaluation tested the skin irritation and sensitization of an acaricide (Wagoojabi II®, WGJB) for the control of poultry red mite, containing 20% Chamaecyparis obtusa oil and 56% Cinnamomum camphora oil. In a primary skin irritation test, rabbits were dermally treated with WGJB for 24 h. The acaricide did not induce any adverse reactions such as erythema and edema on intact skin sites, but on abraded skin sites, some rabbits showed very slight erythema and edema 24 h after topical application. So, the acaricide was classified as a practically mild-irritating material based on a 0.625 primary irritation index score. In the skin sensitization test, guinea pigs were sensitized with intradermal injection of 0.1mL WGJB for 24 h. After 1 week, The WGJB was treated on the site of injection, and challenged 2 weeks later. The WGJB did not induce any allergic reactions. Therefore, the WGJB was graded as a weak material at '0' in both sensitization score and rate. From the results of this study, it is suggested that WGJB does not cause contact irritation and sensitization.

본 연구는 닭 진드기 구제를 목적으로 개발된 살비제인와구잡이 II® (WGJB, 편백정유 : 계피정유 = 20 : 56)에 대하여 토끼와 기니픽을 이용하여 피부 자극성 및 감작성 평가를 각각 수행하였다. 일차피부자극시험에서 토끼의 피부에 WGJB를 24시간 동안 처리한 후 피부 자극성을 확인한 결과, WGJB는 비찰과 부위에서 홍반과 부종과 같은 어떠한 부작용도 일으키지 않았으나, 몇몇 토끼의 찰과 부위에서 매우 약한 홍반과 부종을 나타내어 WGJB의 1차 피부자극 지수는 0.625이었다. 따라서 WGJB는 약한 자극성이 있는 물질로 분류되었다. 피부감작성 시험에서 기니픽에 0.1 mL의 WGJB을 피내주사한 후 24시간 동안 감작시켰다. 감작 1주일 후 WGJB를 함유한 패취를 주사부위에 부착하여 48시간 동안 처리한 다음, 2주 후에 WGJB를 함유한 패취를 부착하여 감작을 야기시켰다. WGJB는 어떠한 알러지 반응도 나타내지 않았다. 따라서, 본 연구를 통하여 WGJB는 약한 피부 자극성을 가지며 감작성을 야기하지 않는 물질로 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nam, S.H., Kwak, J.I., Kim, D., An, Y.J., A comparative study of management system of unregulated agricultural pesticides in Korea, the European Union, and the United States of America: a review. J. Appl. Biol. Chem., 61, 195-204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3839/jabc.2018.029
  2. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), 2017. Press release. Result on collection and inspection for extended application of inspection substances for eggs distributed on the market. MFDS, Osong.
  3. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), 2018. Amendment on criteria and standard for food. Notification No. 2018-18. MFDS, Osong.
  4. Kang, S.M., Lee, C.H., Park, O.J., Leem, J.H., Yoon, H.J., Kweon, O.K., Efficacy of fipronil-applied canine hair against house dust mites. J. Vet. Clin., 19, 215-218 (2002).
  5. Moro, C.V., De Luna, C.J., Tod, A., Guy, J.H., Sparagano, O.A., Zenner, L., The poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae): a potential vector of pathogenic agents. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 48, 93-104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-009-9248-0
  6. Flochlay, A.S., Thomas, E., Sparagano, O., Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) infestation: a broad impact parasitological disease that still remains a significant challenge for the egg-laying industry in Europe. Parasite. Vector., 10, 357 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2292-4
  7. Bartley, K., Turnbul, F., Wright, H.W., Huntley, J.F., Palarea-Albaladejo, J., Nath, M., Nisbeta, A.J., Field evaluation of poultry red mite (Dermanysus gallinae) native and recombinant prototype vaccines. Vet. Parasitol., 24, 25-34 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(87)90127-0
  8. Hong, E, Park, K.T., Kang, B.S., Kang, H.K., Jeon, J.J., Kim, H.S. Son, J., Kim, C.H., Acaricidal efect of mixtures of hydrated lime and ethanol on poultry red mite (Dermanysus gallinae). Korean J. Poult. Sci., 47, 21-27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2020.47.1.21
  9. George, D.R., Fin, R.D., Graham, K.M., Mul, M.F., Maurer, V., Moro, C.V., Sparagano, O.A.E., Should the poultry red mite Dermanysus gallinae be of wider concern for veterinary and medical science? Parasite. Vector., 8, 178-187 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0768-7
  10. Valiente-Moro, C., Chauve, C., Zenner, L., Experimental infection of Salmonella enteritidis by the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet. Parasitol., 146, 329-336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.02.024
  11. Abdigoudarzi, M., Mirafzali, M.S., Belgheiszadeh, H., Human infestation with Dermanysus gallinae (Acari: Dermanysidae) in a family refered with pruritus and skin lesions. J. Arthropod. Borne Dis., 8, 19-123 (2013).
  12. Wang, C., Huang, Y., Ma, Y., Xu, X., Wan, Q., Li, H., Yu, H., Pan, B., First record of Aspergilus oryzae as an entomopathogenic fungus against the poultry red mite Dermanysus gallinae. Vet. Parasitol., 271, 57-63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.06.011
  13. Nordenfors, H., Hoglund, J., Tauson R., Chirico, J., Effect of permethrin impregnated plastic strips on Dermanyssus gallinae in loose-housing systems for laying hens. Vet. Parasitol., 102, 121-131 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00528-3
  14. Murano, T., Namiki, K., Shina K., Yasukawa H., Resistance development of Dermanyssus gallinae against commercial acaricides in poultry farms in Japan. J. Jpn. Vet. Med. Assoc., 68, 509-514 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12935/jvma.68.509
  15. Sarwar, M., The dangers of pesticides associated with public health and preventing of the risks. Int. J. Bioinform. Res. Appl., 1, 130-136 (2015).
  16. Tabari, M.A., Youssefi, M.R., Bnelli, G., Eco-friendly control of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae (Dermanyssidae), using the α-thujone-rich essential oil of Artemisia sieberi (Asteraceae): toxic and repellent potential. Parasitol. Res., 116, 1545-1551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-017-5431-0
  17. Ulrichs, C., Han, Y.J., Abdelhamid, M.T., Mewis, I., Management of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae, using silica-based acaricides. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 82, 243- 254 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00541-y
  18. Gorji, S.F., Gorji, S.F., Rajabloo, M., The field efficacy of garlic extract against Dermanyssus gallinae in layer farms of Babol, Iran. Parasitol. Res., 113, 1209-1213 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-3759-2
  19. Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), 2016. Regulations on toxicity test for veterinary drugs. APQA Notice No. 2016-23. APQA, Gimcheon, Korea.
  20. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), 2017. Standard for toxicity study of pharmaceuticals. MFDS Notice No. 2017-71. MFDS, Cheongju, Korea.
  21. Lim, C.W., 2018. A study on acute oral toxicity, skin and ocular irritation tests of Chamaecyparis obtusa essential oil. MS Thesis Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, pp. 29-30.
  22. Jeong, M., Kwon, M.J., Park, S.J., Hong, S.S., Park, K.H., Park, J.E, Yeon, S.H., Evaluation of acute toxicity of plant extracts, lavender, lemon eucalyptus and cassia essential oil. Korean J. Pestic. Sci., 14, 339-346 (2010).
  23. Lauriola, M.M., De Bitonto, A., Sena, P., Allergic contact dermatitis due to cinnamon oil in galenic vaginal suppositories. Acta Derm. Venereol., 90, 187-188 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0782
  24. Olsen, R.V., Andersen, H.H., Moller, H.G., Eskelund, P.W., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Somatosensory and vasomotor manifestations of individual and combined stimulation of TRPM8 and TRPA1 using topical L-menthol and trans-cinnamaldehyde in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Pain., 18, 1333-1342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.494.x
  25. Hwang, D.H., Park, E.K., Yoo, C.Y., Kim, S., Kim, E., Lee, H.J., Skin sensitization test of Chamaecyparis obtusa essential oil in guinea pigs. J. Prev. Vet. Med., 43, 101-106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.13041/jpvm.2019.43.3.101
  26. Woolf, A., Essential oil poisoning. J. Toxicol. Clin., 37, 721- 727 (1999).
  27. Bickers, D., Calow, P., Greim, H., Hanifin, J.M., Rogers, A.E., Saurat, J.H., Sipes, I.G., Smith, R.L., Tagami, H., A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid when used as fragrance ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol., 43, 799-836 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.09.013
  28. Lee, J.S., Lee, S.D., Hwang, K.H., Kim, H.S., Yoo, I.S., Han, K.Y., Chae, Y.Z., Analysis of cinnamic acid, cinnamaldehyde and 2-methoxycinnamaldehyde in Cinnamomi ramulus on the market in Seoul by HPLC. Yakhak Hoeji, 57, 235-240 (2013).