Korean Journal of Materials Research (한국재료학회지)

Materials Research Society of Korea (한국재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fabrication and Magnetic Properties of Mg and BaFe12O19 Ferromagnetic Composite Powders by Mechanical Alloying

기계적합금화법에 의한 Mg-BaFe12O19 계 강자성 복합분말의 제조 및 자기특성

  • Lee, Chung-Hyo (Department of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, Mokpo National University)
  • 이충효 (목포대학교 신소재공학과)
  • Received : 2020.12.21
  • Accepted : 2021.01.13
  • Published : 2021.02.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Fabrication of a ferromagnetic composite powder for the magnesium and BaFe12O19 system by mechanical alloying (MA) is investigated at room temperature. Mixtures of Mg and BaFe12O19 powders with a weight ratio of Mg:BaFe12O19 = 4:1, 3:2, 2:3 and 1:4 are used. Optimal MA conditions to obtain a ferromagnetic composite with fine microstructure are investigated by X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) measurement. It is found that Mg-BaFe12O19 composite powders in which BaFe12O19 is dispersed in Mg matrix are successfully produced by MA of BaFe12O19 with Mg for 80 min. for all compositions. Magnetization of Mg-BaFe12O19 composite powders gradually increases with increasing the amounts of BaFe12O19, whereas coercive force of MA powders gradually decreases due to the refinement of BaFe12O19 powders with MA time for all compositions. However, it can be seen that the coercivity of Mg-BaFe12O19 MA composite powders with a weight ratio of Mg:BaFe12O19=4:1 and 3:2 for MA 80 min. are still high, with values of 1260 Oe and 1320 Oe compared to that of Mg:BaFe12O19=1:4. This clearly suggests that the refinement of BaFe12O19 powders during MA process for Mg:BaFe12O19=4:1 and 3:2 tends to be suppressed due to ductile Mg powders.

Keywords

References

  1. R. B. Schwarz and C. C. Koch, Appl. Phys. Lett., 49, 146 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.97206
  2. K. Enami, S. Ono, M. Ohara and T. Igarashi, J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall., 56, 350 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2497/jjspm.56.350
  3. J. Eckert and L. Schultz, J. Less Common Met., 166, 293 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(90)90011-8
  4. H. J. Fecht, E. Hellstern, Z. Fu and W. L. Johnson, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 21, 2333 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02646980
  5. R. B. Schwarz and W. L. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett., 51, 415 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.415
  6. L. Schultz and J. Wecker, Mater. Sci. Eng., 99, 127 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(88)90307-2
  7. L. Schultz and J. Wecker, J. Appl. Phys., 64, 5711 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.342234
  8. M. Pardavi-Horvath and L.Takacs, J. Appl. Phys., 73, 6958 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.352447
  9. C. H. Lee, J. Ceram. Proc. Res., 9, 321 (2008). https://doi.org/10.36410/JCPR.2008.9.3.321
  10. K. Tokumitsu, Mater. Sci. Forum, 88-90, 715 (1992). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.88-90.715
  11. W.H. Hall, J. Inst. Met., 75, 1127 (1948).
  12. U. Mizutani and C. H. Lee, Mater. Trans. JIM., 36, 210 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans1989.36.210
  13. K. Schnitzke, L. Schultz, J. Wecker and M. Katter, Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 2853 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.104202
  14. G. Herzer, IEEE. Trans. Magn., 25, 3327 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.42292
  15. K. Goto, M. Ito and T. Sakurai, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 19, 1339 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.19.1339