Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Factors Influencing Corporate Patent Activities on Management Performance

기업의 특허활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 요인

  • Park, Eun-Mi (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seo, Joung-Hae (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2020.12.29
  • Accepted : 2021.02.20
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Companies are actively engaged in various innovation activities and intellectual property rights activities such as patents in order to survive in a fiercely competitive global environment. The purpose of this study is to understand the factors that influence corporate patent-related activities on business results. For this reason, we conducted a questionnaire survey of patent practitioners and R & D personnel of Chinese companies, and analyzed the causal relationship using PLS analysis tools. As a result of the analysis, it was found that compensation and obstacle factors have a significant effect on information sharing (collaboration)... It was found that information sharing (collaboration) has a significant impact on technology complementation (improvement) and corporate image. It was also found that technical complementation (improvement) and corporate image have an impact on management results. The results of this study will be able to find and strategically utilize the factors that promote and encourage companies to develop their patent activities.

치열한 글로벌 경쟁환경하에서 살아남기 위해 기업들은 다양한 혁신활동과 특허 등의 지식재산권 활동을 활발하게 전개하고 있다. 본 연구는 기업의 특허 관련 활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향요인을 파악하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 중국기업의 특허담당 실무자와 연구개발 담당자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, PLS 분석도구를 활용하여 인과관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 보상과 장애요인이 정보공유(협업)에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 정보공유(협업)이 기술적 보완(개선)과 기업이미지에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기술적 보완(개선)과 기업이미지가 경영성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 기업이 특허활동을 전개하는데 있어 촉진 및 장려하는 요인을 찾아내어 전략적으로 활용이 가능할 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. T. Park, & C. Liu. (2020). A study on topic models using LDA and Word2Vec in travel route recommendation: focus on convergence travel and tours reviews. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00779-020-01476-2
  2. S. T. Park, J. R. Jung, & C. Liu. (2020). A study on policy measure for knowledge-based management in ICT companies: focused on appropriability mechanisms. Information Technology and Management, 21(1), 1-13. DOI:10.1007/s10799-019-00298-w
  3. Y. K. Kim, & S. T. Park. (2019). An Examination on Factors Influencing Patent Valuation and their Effects on Business Management Performance, Test Engineering and Management, 59(6s), 483-490.
  4. Y. K. Kim, & S. T. Park. (2019). Effects of Rewards and Collaboration on Patenting and Innovative Activities and Performance, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 168-172.
  5. S. M. Choi, Y. K. Kim, S. T. Par, & T. U. Kim. (2018) Effect of Technological Innovation Competencies on Patent Activities and Product Performance, Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10(1), 235-241.
  6. S. T. Park, S. M. Choi & Y. K. Kim. (2017). Effects of Patent Infringement Response Activities and Patent-based Activities on Corporate Image and Management Performance, International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(20), 119-127.
  7. S. T. Park, S. J. Lee, & Y. K. Kim. (2011). Weight Differences of Patent Valuation Factors by Industries. Journal of Digital Convergence, 9(3), 105-116. DOI: 10.14400/JDPM.2011.9.3.105
  8. D. E. Shin. (2019). http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/economy_general/915881.html
  9. S. T. Park, Y. K. Kim & T. U. Kim. (2013). A study on influencing factors of patent activities on management performance. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 12(3), 121-129.
  10. K. W. Artz, P. M. Norman, D. E. Hatfield & L. B. Cardinal. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725-740. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x
  11. S. M. Choi, S. T. Park, & Y. K. Kim. (2017). A Study on effects of Exploration and Exploitation on Patent Activities and Innovation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(8), 2735-2742. DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00486.3
  12. E. M. Park & J. H. Seo. (2018). A study on effect of technological Innovation and Patent Competency on business Performance. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(8), 571-579. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00794.5
  13. E. M. Park, & J. H. Seo. (2020). The Effects of Obstructive Factors and Rewards Related to Technological Innovation on Management Performance: Focusing on Chinese Companies. Research in World Economy, 11(2), 98-104. DOI: 10.5430/rwe.v11n2p98
  14. J. M. Song. (2011). A Study on Corporate Brand Image through Collaboration of Designer -Focus on the Case design by Lee Sang Bong using Korean Images. Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 12(6), 243-251.
  15. W. W. Chin. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
  16. J. C. Nunnally. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill education.
  17. R. Thompson, D. W. Barclay & C. A. Higgins. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology studies: special issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 284-324.
  18. C. Fornell, & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312
  19. R. F. Falk & N. B. Miller. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.