디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권2호
  • /
  • Pages.83-92
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비대면 근무에 대한 근로자와 관리자의 인식에 관한 상호지향성 분석

Co-orientation Analysis of Workers' and Managers' Perceptions on Untact Work

  • 권호중 (고려대학교 디지털경영학과) ;
  • 민대환 (고려대학교 디지털경영학과)
  • Kwon, Hojung (Department of Digital Management, Korea University) ;
  • Min, Daihwan (Digital Management, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.23
  • 심사 : 2021.02.20
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

코로나19로 인한 '사회적 거리 두기' 확산에 따라 비대면 근무가 불가피하게 시행되고 있는데, 실효성에 대한 논란이 있어 구성원의 인식을 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 비대면 근무에 관한 기존 문헌 검토 후 쟁점들을 도출하고, 비대면 근무를 경험한 근로자와 관리자를 대상으로 심층 면담을 실시하여 정성적으로 내용을 분석하고, 상호지향성 모델을 적용하여 비교하였다. 두 집단 공통으로 '소통의 어려움'을 가장 많이 지적하였고, 직무만족, 소속감, 일과 삶의 균형 등에 대한 근로자와 관리자의 인식 차이는 발견하지 못했으나, 인사고과 시 불이익에 대해 인식(객관적 일치도, 근로자의 정확도)의 차이를 보였고, 업무 생산성에 대한 인식(근로자의 주관적 일치도)에서도 차이를 보였다. 기존 연구는 비대면 근무의 일반적인 쟁점들을 논의하였지만, 본 연구는 근로자와 관리자의 인식 차이에 초점을 맞추어 조사하고 인식 차이를 완화시킬 방안의 필요성을 제기한 점에 의의가 있으며, 향후 더 많은 근로자와 관리자를 대상으로 하는 정량적 연구로 확장할 필요가 있다.

Recently many organizations have adopted 'untact' work due to social distancing caused by Coronavirus-19. To clarify some controversy about the effectiveness from 'untact' work, it is necessary to examine the cognition of organizational members. This study identified issues in 'untact' work from the literature review, analyzed the content of in-depth interviews with workers and managers experiencing 'untact' work, and compared both groups' cognition by applying the co-orientation model. Both groups pointed out the communication difficulty as the top disadvantage and showed no significant differences in job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and work-life balance. However, the two groups showed significant differences in their cognition about performance evaluation (agreement and workers' congruence) and productivity enhancement (workers' accuracy). This paper has an academic contribution in that it has focused on cognitive gaps between workers and managers, urges organizations to devise ways to reduce the gaps, and suggests future studies with quantitative approaches.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. J. Kang. & S. M. Park.(2020). Smart Work Policy Trends. Digital Seoul Issue Report, 2.
  2. H. Huws. (1990). Telework: Towards the Elusive Office. John Wiley & Sons.
  3. C. J. Seo. & H. J. Kim. (2013). Delphi Study on Profiles of Fit for Home-based Call Center -Focused Call Center Service-. Journal of Korea Service Management Society, 14(1), 207-227.
  4. M. S. Ahan. (2020). Let's solve this problem through ICT-based telecommuting and telecommuting. Local Informatization Magazine, 121(0), 60-63.
  5. J. M. McLeod & S. H. Chaffee (1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(4).
  6. M. J. Kang & S. M. Park. (2020). Smart Work Policy Trends: Focused on remote work in major countries. Digital Seoul Issue Report, 2.
  7. E. Raguseo, L. Gastaldi, & P. Neirotti. (2016). "Smart work: Supporting employees' flexibility through ICT, HR practices and office layout," in Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 4(3), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-01-2016-0004
  8. S. Oh, J. M. Lee & Y. Y. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Job Satisfaction in the Smart Work Environment. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(11), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.11.393
  9. H. L. Angle & J. L. Perry. (1981). An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392596
  10. S. H. Choi. & J. M. Lee. (2020). The Effect of Work-Life Balance on Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(3), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.3.083
  11. J. Nilles. (1998). Managing Telework: Strategies for Managing the Virtual Workforce. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  12. A. Felstead. & D. Reuschke. (2020). 'Homeworking in the UK: before and during the 2020 lockdown', WISERD Report, Cardiff: Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research.
  13. S. J. Oh., J. M. Lee. & Y. Y. Kim. (2020). Study on the Organizational Support for Smart Work. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(7), 231-238, https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.7.231
  14. Y. Baruch. (2000). Telewoking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00063
  15. M. K. Sung, S. H. Bang & S. H. Kwon. (2011). An Exploratory Study on Perception and Changes due to Smartwork: Focusing on Experience of Smartwork Participants. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 7(3), 79-107. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2011.12.7.3.79
  16. Y. S. Kang & S. D. Kwon. (2016). A Study on the Influencing Factors of Smart-Work Performance. Journal of Information Technology Application & Management, 23(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.21219/jitam.2016.23.1.061
  17. Y. J. Cho. (2019). A Qualitative Study on Communication among Teachers in an Elementary School. Doctoral dissertation. Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.
  18. B. H. Jung. (2018). A Study on the Job Productivity by the Smart Work Investment - Focused on the Organizational Change Resistance and the Communication. Management & Information Systems Review, 37(3), 83-113. DOI : 10.29214/damis.2018.37.3.005
  19. S. Y. Jung & Y. T. Shin.(2018), Study on the Analysis of Difference between IT and Non-IT Companies on the Smart Work Environment Continuous Use Intention-Focusing on Korean Small and Medium Enterprises, Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 16. No. 3, pp. 249-259. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.249
  20. H. Y. Kim., H. G. Oh (2018). Study on the Effects of Work Autonomy, Work Environment, and Innovation-oriented Culture on the Innovative Behavior of Public Servants : Focusing on the Effect Difference of Satisfaction with using the Smart Work Center. Journal of Social Science, 29(3), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2018.07.29.3.243
  21. D. H. Baek & J. H. Park. (2020). Impact of Use of Smart Work on Women's Work-Life Balance. The Journal of Women and Economics, 17(3), 1-26.
  22. Statistics Korea. (2019). Work-Family Balance Indicators.
  23. NIA. (2010). Age of IT Navigation, Future Trends and National Strategy. Seoul : NIA.
  24. S. W. Choi. (2020). Characteristics and Distribution of Teleworkable Jobs Based on Physical Working Conditions. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 23(3), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.23841/EGSK.2020.23.3.276
  25. J. H. Park. & S. I. Kim. (2020). A Study on the Usability of Authorized Tools by Types of Collaboration-Focused on Collaboration between Designer and Developer. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(10), 453-458 https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.10.453
  26. C. S. Kim., W. S. Lee. & M. I. Choi. (2014). Mutual Understanding and Misunderstanding between Viewers and KBS Employees on TV License Fee Focusing on Co-orientation Model. Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunications Research, 85, 68-101.
  27. J. S. Kim. & Y. M. Lee. (2013). An Exploratory Study on the Applicability of a Co-orientation Model for Explaining the Cognitive Difference in Project Communication. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 20(5), 1-25.