DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) peel pellet as a rumen enhancer in Holstein crossbred bulls

  • Matra, Maharach (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Totakul, Pajaree (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Viennasay, Bounnaxay (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Phesatcha, Burarat (Department of Agricultural Technology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Liberal Arts, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan) ;
  • Wanapat, Metha (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.09
  • 심사 : 2020.07.19
  • 발행 : 2021.04.01

초록

Objective: An experiment was conducted to assess the effect of dragon fruit peel pellet (DFPP) as a rumen enhancer of dry matter consumption, nutrient digestibilities, ruminal ecology, microbial protein synthesis and rumimal methane production in Holstein crossbred bulls. Methods: Four animals, with an average live-weight of 200±20 kg were randomly assigned in a 4×4 Latin square design to investigate the influence of DFPP supplementation. There were four different dietary treatments: without DFPP, and with 200, 300, and 400 g/h/d, respectively. Results: Results revealed that dry matter consumption of total intake, rice straw and concentrate were not significantly different among treatments (p>0.05). It was also found that ruminal pH was not different among treatments (p>0.05), whilst protozoal group was reduced when DFPP increased (p<0.01). Blood urea nitrogen and NH3-N concentrations were increased at 400 g of DFPP supplementation (p<0.01). Additionally, volatile fatty acid production of propionate was significantly enhanced by the DFPP supplementation (p<0.05), while production of methane was consequently decreased (p<0.05). Furthermore, microbial protein synthesis and urinary purine derivatives were remarkably increased especially at 400 g of DFPP supplementation (p<0.05). Conclusion: Plant secondary compounds or phytonutrients (PTN) containing saponins (SP) and condensed tannins (CT) have been reported to influence rumen fermentation. DFPP contains both CT and SP as a PTN. The addition of 400 g of DFPP resulted in improved rumen fermentation end-products especially propionate (C3) and microbial protein synthesis. Therefore, DFPP is a promising rumen enhancer and indicated a significant potential of DFPP as feedstuff for ruminant feed to mitigate rumen methane production.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007. pp. 19-91.
  2. Russell JB, Rychlik JL. Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science 2001;292:1119-22. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058830
  3. Kamra DN, Agarwal N, Chaudhary LC. Manipulation of rumen microbial ecosystem for reducing enteric methane emission in livestock. In: Sejian V, Gaughan J, Baumgard L, Prasad C, editor. Climate change impact on livestock: adaptation and mitigation. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2015. pp. 255-72.
  4. Wanapat M, Puramongkon T, Siphuak W. Feeding of cassava hay for lactating dairy cows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2000;13:478-82. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.478
  5. Wang Y, McAllister TA, Yanke LJ, Cheeke PR. Effect of steroidal saponin from Yucca schidigera extract on ruminal microbes. J Appl Microbiol 2000;88:887-96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01054.x
  6. Addisu S, Assefa A. Role of plant containing saponin on livestock production; a review. Adv Biol Res 2016;10:309-14. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.abr.2016.309.314
  7. Molina-Botero IC, Arroyave-Jaramillo J, Valencia-Salazar S, et al. Effects of tannins and saponins contained in foliage of Gliricidia sepium and pods of Enterolobium cyclocarpum on fermentation, methane emissions and rumen microbial population in crossbred heifers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2019;251:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.01.011
  8. Reddy PRK, Elghandour MMMY, Salem AZM, et al. Plant secondary metabolites as feed additives in calves for antimicrobial stewardship. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020;264:114469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114469
  9. Anantasook N, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A, Gunun P. Effect of plants containing secondary compounds with palm oil on feed intake, digestibility, microbial protein synthesis and microbial population in dairy cows. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013;26:820-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ ajas.2012.12689
  10. Tenore GC, Novellino E, Basile A. Nutraceutical potential and antioxidant benefits of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) extracts. J Funct Foods 2012;4:129-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2011. 09.003
  11. Manihuruk FM, Suryati T, Arief II. Effectiveness of the red dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel extract as the colorant, antioxidant, and antimicrobial on beef sausage. Media Peternakan 2017;40:47-54. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2017.40.1.47
  12. Matra M, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A, Foiklang S, Mapato C. Dietary dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) peel powder improved in vitro rumen fermentation and gas production kinetics. Trop Anim Health Prod 2019;51:1531-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01844-y
  13. Wanapat M, Gunun P, Anantasook N, Kang S. Changes of rumen pH, fermentation and microbial population as influenced by different ratios of roughage (rice straw) to concentrate in dairy steers. J Agric Sci 2014;152:675-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859613000658
  14. Chen XB, Kyle DJ, Orskov ER. Measurement of allantoin in urine and plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with pre-column derivatization. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1993;617:241-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(93)80494-O
  15. Chen XB, Gomes MJ. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives-an overview of the technical details. Bucksburn, Aberdeen, UK: Rowel Research Institute; 1992.
  16. Agricultural Research Council. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Slough, UK: CAB; 1980. pp. 45.
  17. Galyean ML. Laboratory procedures in animal nutrition research. Las Cruces, NM, USA: New Mexico State University; 1989.
  18. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 19th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2012.
  19. Mathew S, Sagathewan S, Thomas J, Mathen G. An HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acids in ruminal fluid. Indian J Anim Sci 1997;67:805-7.
  20. Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootec 2000;49:231-53. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000119
  21. Croker CL. Rapid determination of urea nitrogen in serum or plasma without deproteinization. Am J Med Technol 1967;33:361-5
  22. SAS Institute Inc. User's guide: statistic, version 9.4th edition. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 2013.
  23. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics. NY, USA: Me-Graw Hill; 1980.
  24. Ampapon T, Phesatcha K, Wanapat M. Effects of phytonutrients on ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and microorganisms in swamp buffaloes. Animals 2019;9:671. https://doi.org/10. 3390/ani9090671 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090671
  25. Naumann HD, Tedeschi LO, Zeller WE, Huntley NF. The role of condensed tannins in ruminant animal production: advances, limitations and future directions. Rev Bras Zootec 2017;46:929-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-92902017001200009
  26. Ampapon T, Wanapat M. Dietary rambutan peel powder as a rumen modifier in beef cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2020;33:763-9. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0342
  27. Van Soest PJ. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press; 1994.
  28. Cieslak A, Zmora P, Matkowski A, et al. Tannins from Sanguisorba officinalis affect in vitro rumen methane production and fermentation. J Anim Plant Sci 2016;26:54-62.
  29. Patra AK, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. J Sci Food Agric 2011;91:24-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4152
  30. Foiklang S, Wanapat M, Norrapoke T. In vitro rumen fermentation and digestibility of buffaloes as influenced by grape pomace powder and urea treated rice straw supplementation. Anim Sci J 2016;87:370-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12428
  31. Byers FM, Moxon AL. Protein and selenium levels for growing and finishing beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1980;50:1136-44. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1980.5061136x
  32. Foiklang S, Wanapat M, Norrapoke T. Effect of grape pomace powder, mangosteen peel powder and monensin on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation, nitrogen balance and microbial protein synthesis in dairy steers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:1416-23. https://doi.org/10.5713/ ajas.15.0689
  33. Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, Martinez TF, McAllister TA. Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 2007;85:1990-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-686
  34. Naumann HD, Muir JP, Lambert BD, Tedeschi LO, Kothmann MM. Condensed tannins in the ruminant environment: a perspective on biological activity. J Agric Sci 2013;1:8-20.
  35. Anantasook N, Wanapat M, Gunun P, Cherdthong A. Reducing methane production by supplementation of Terminalia chebula RETZ. containing tannins and saponins. Anim Sci J 2016;87:783-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12494
  36. Abarghuei MJ, Rouzbehan Y, Alipour D. The influence of the grape pomace on the ruminal parameters of sheep. Livest Sci 2010;132:73-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.05.002
  37. Pineiro-Vazquez AT, Jimenez-Ferrer G, Alayon-Gamboa JA, et al. Effects of quebracho tannin extract on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation, and methane production in crossbred heifers fed low-quality tropical grass. Trop Anim Health Prod 2018;50:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1396-3
  38. Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, et al. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. a review of enteric methane mitigation options. J Anim Sci 2013;91:5045-69. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6583
  39. Gemeda BS, Hassen A. Effect of tannin and species variation on in vitro digestibility, gas, and methane production of tropical browse plants. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:188-99. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0325
  40. Yang K, Wei C, Zhao GY, Xu ZW, Lin SX. Effects of dietary supplementing tannic acid in the ration of beef cattle on rumen fermentation, methane emission, microbial flora and nutrient digestibility. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2017;101:302-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12531
  41. Kang S, Wanapat M, Cherdthorng A. Effect of banana flower powder supplementation as a rumen buffer on rumen fermentation efficiency and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers fed a high-concentrate diet. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;196:32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014. 07.003
  42. Polyorach S, Wanapat M. Improving the quality of rice straw by urea and calcium hydroxide on rumen ecology, microbial protein synthesis in beef cattle. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2015;99:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12253
  43. Firkins JL, Yu Z, Morrison M. Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. J Dairy Sci 2007;90(Suppl):E1-16. https://doi.org/10.3168/ jds.2006-518