의학교육논단 (Korean Medical Education Review)

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.3-10
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2092-5603(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-6370(eISSN)
연세대학교 의과대학 (Yonsei university college of medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미래학습에서의 Learning by Teaching 적용가능성

Reconsidering the Concept and Potential of Learning by Teaching

  • 최효선 (조선대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
  • Choi, Hyoseon (Department of Medical Education, Chosun University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.12.24
  • 심사 : 2021.02.04
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Learning by teaching (LbT) has long been recognized as an important learning behavior that constructs meaning based on interactions between learners. This study aimed to explore the meaning of LbT as an important learning activity for future implementation in education. LbT is based on the cultural historical activity theory and sociocultural learning theory, as developed by scholars including Vygotsky. These frameworks value the construction of meaning based on language, and LbT is reported to be effective in constructing meaning. In addition, within the zone of proximal development posited by Vygotsky, learning through interaction between learners improves academic achievement, higher-order thinking, deep learning, and reflective learning. LbT also promotes students' learning presence, and strengthens various competencies such as collaboration and communication skills. Interactive behavior between learners in the form of LbT has been explored as an approach to teaching and learning, with methods including peer learning, peer tutoring, peer teaching, peer mentoring, Lernen durch Lehren, and peer-assisted learning. LbT has also been applied as a learning method. In the future, LbT has boundless potential to improve learning through activities such as flipped learning or online learning based on interactions between learners.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee HJ, Im SH, Kang SM. Implications for innovation in higher education from Minerva Schools. J Lifelong Learn Soc. 2019;15(2):59-84. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2019.5.15.2.59
  2. Cho H. How to study 100 classics in St. John's University. Seoul: Bada Publisher; 2016.
  3. Lyons K, McLaughlin JE, Khanova J, Roth MT. Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017;22(3):723-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9707-4
  4. Walsh K. Oxford textbook of medical education. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
  5. Ross MT, Cameron HS. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):527-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701665886
  6. Aba Alkhail B. Near-peer-assisted learning (NPAL) in undergraduate medical students and their perception of having medical interns as their near peer teacher. Med Teach. 2015;37 Suppl 1:S33-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1006602
  7. Rees EL, Quinn PJ, Davies B, Fotheringham V. How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2016;38(8):829-37. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112888
  8. Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):591-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701606799
  9. Duran D. Learning-by-teaching: evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2016;54(5):476-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1156011
  10. Kim M. The trend and directions of classroom interaction research: from a perspective of socio-constructivism. Korean J Educ Psychol. 2017;31(4):683-711. https://doi.org/10.17286/kjep.2017.31.4.05
  11. Light P, Littleton K, Messer D, Joiner R. Social and communicative processes in computer-based problem solving. Eur J Psychol Educ. 1994;9(2):93-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173545
  12. Mercer N. The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learn Instr. 1996;6(4):359-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7
  13. Wells G. The centrality of talk in education. In: Norman K, editor. Thinking voices: the work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton; 1992. p. 283-310.
  14. Kozulin A. The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. Am Psychol. 1986r;41(3):264-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.3.264
  15. Fletcher JM. Memory for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in learning disability subgroups: analysis by selective reminding. J Exp Child Psychol. 1985;40(2):244-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(85)90088-8
  16. Valsiner J, van der Veer R. Encountering the border: Vygotsky's zona blizhaishego razvitia and its implications for theories of development. In: Yasnitsky A, van der Veer R, Michel Ferrari M, editors. The Cambridge of handbook of cultural-historical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 148-73.
  17. Vygotsky LS. Thought and language. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1986.
  18. Carberry AR. Learning-by-teaching as a pedagogical approach and its implications on engineering education [dissertation]. Medford (MA): Tufts University; 2008.
  19. Gartner A, Kohler M, Riessman F. Children teach children: learning by teaching. New York (NY): Harper & Row; 1971.
  20. Topping KJ. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol. 2005;25(6):631-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
  21. Falchikov N. Learning together: peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer; 2001.
  22. Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 1999;24(4):413-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405
  23. Keppell M, Au E, Ma A, Chan C. Peer learning and learning-oriented assessment in technology-enhanced environments. Assess Eval High Educ. 2006;31(4):453-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679159
  24. Damon W, Phelps E. Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. Int J Educ Res. 1989;13(1):9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-X
  25. Topping K. The peer tutoring handbook: promoting co-operative learning. Cambridge (MA): Brookline Books; 1988.
  26. Sharpley AM, Sharpley CF. Peer tutoring: a review of the literature. Collect Orig Resour Educ. 1981;5(3):7-C11.
  27. Cohen PA, Kulik JA, Kulik CL. Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings. Am Educ Res J. 1982;19(2):237-48. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002237
  28. Mirzeoglu AD. The effects of peer teaching on the university students achievements in cognitive, affective, psychomotor domains and game performances in volleyball courses. Educ Res Rev. 2014;9(9):262-71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1690
  29. De Lisi R. From marbles to instant messenger: implications of Piagets ideas about peer learning. Theory Pract. 2002;41(1):5-12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_2
  30. Velez JJ, Cano J, Whittington MS, Wolf KJ. Cultivating change through peer teaching. J Agric Educ. 2011;52(1):40-9. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01040
  31. Wadoodi A, Crosby JR. Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited. Med Teach. 2002;24(3):241-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590220134060
  32. Henderson C, Dancy MH. Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States. Phys Rev Spec Top Phys Educ Res. 2009;5(2):020107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020107
  33. Mazur E. Education: farewell, lecture? Science. 2009;323(5910):50-1. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168927
  34. Bozeman B, Feeney MK. Mentor matching: a "goodness of fit" model. Adm Soc. 2008;40(5):465-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708320184
  35. Glass N, Walter R. An experience of peer mentoring with student nurses: enhancement of personal and professional growth. J Nurs Educ. 2000;39(4):155-60. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20000401-05
  36. Skinner B. Learning by teaching. Zielspr Engl. 1994;1994(2):38-9.
  37. Tai JH, Haines TP, Canny BJ, Molloy EK. A study of medical students' peer learning on clinical placements: what they have taught themselves to do. J Peer Learn. 2014;7(1):57-80.
  38. Topping K, Ehly S. Introduction to peer-assisted learning. In: Topping K, Ehly S, editors. Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998. p. 1-23.
  39. Seifert L, Manap A, Sterz J, Gerlach F, Sader R. A comparison between virtual patient and peer-assisted learning in teaching basic medical knowledge and skills. Electron J e-Learn. 2020;18(1):40-56.
  40. Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, Durning S. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):583-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583824
  41. Anderton R, Chiu L, Aulfrey S. Student perceptions to teaching undergraduate anatomy in health sciences. Int J High Educ. 2016; 5(3):201-16.
  42. Hopp H, Vogelbacher M, Kieseier T, Thoma D. Bilingual advantages in early foreign language learning: effects of the minority and the majority language. Learn Instr. 2019;61:99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.02.001
  43. Cloward RD. Studies in tutoring. J Exp Educ. 1967;36(1):14-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1967.11011022
  44. Sobral DT. Peer tutoring and student outcomes in a problem-based course. Med Educ. 1994;28(4):284-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02713.x
  45. Sobral DT. Learning the educator role: a course for medical students. Med Educ. 1989;23(1):70-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1989.tb00814.x
  46. Bargh JA, Schul Y. On the cognitive benefits of teaching. J Educ Psychol. 1980;72(5):593-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593
  47. Fiorella L, Mayer RE. The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2013;38(4):281-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001
  48. Lachner A, Ly KT, Nuckles M. Providing written or oral explanations?: differential effects of the modality of explaining on students' conceptual learning and transfer. J Exp Educ. 2017;86(3):344-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1363691
  49. Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):249-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
  50. Hoogerheide V, Deijkers L, Loyens SM, Heijltjes A, van Gog T. Gaining from explaining: learning improves from explaining to fictitious others on video, not from writing to them. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2016; 44-45:95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.005
  51. Penuela-Epalza M, De la Hoz K. Incorporation and evaluation of serial concept maps for vertical integration and clinical reasoning in case-based learning tutorials: perspectives of students beginning clinical medicine. Med Teach. 2019;41(4):433-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1487046
  52. Lincoln MA, McAllister LL. Peer learning in clinical education. Med Teach. 1993;15(1):17-25. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599309029007
  53. Piumatti G, Abbiati M, Baroffio A, Gerbase MW. Associations between motivational factors for studying medicine, learning approaches and empathy among medical school candidates. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019;24(2):287-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9866-6
  54. Sandars J, Murray C, Pellow A. Twelve tips for using digital storytelling to promote reflective learning by medical students. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):774-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590801987370
  55. Saqr M, Fors U, Tedre M. How learning analytics can early predict under-achieving students in a blended medical education course. Med Teach. 2017;39(7):757-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1309376
  56. Solomon P, Crowe J. Perceptions of student peer tutors in a problem-based learning programme. Med Teach. 2001;23(2):181-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590020031101
  57. Leelawong K, Biswas G. Designing learning by teaching agents: the Betty's Brain system. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2008;18(3):181-208.
  58. McGee J. Students enhance learning with Bettys Brain software. Tennessean [Internet]. 2014 Feb 20 [cited 2021 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.tennessean.com/story/money/tech/2014/02/21/students-enhance-learning-with-bettys-brain-software/5661123/.
  59. Mandy S. Facilitating student learning in clinical education. Aust J Hum Commun Disord. 1989;17(1):83-93. https://doi.org/10.3109/asl2.1989.17.issue-1.06
  60. Bagian JP. The future of graduate medical education: a systems-based approach to ensure patient safety. Acad Med. 2015;90(9):1199-202. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000824
  61. Wittich CM, Reed DA, McDonald FS, Varkey P, Beckman TJ. Perspective: transformative learning: a framework using critical reflection to link the improvement competencies in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1790-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181f54eed
  62. Schwartzstein RM, Dienstag JL, King RW, Chang BS, Flanagan JG, Besche HC, et al. The Harvard Medical School pathways curriculum: reimagining developmentally appropriate medical education for contemporary learners. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):1687-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003270